Effect of changes in resource level on age and size at metamorphosis in Hyla squirella

Oecologia ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 112 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher W. Beck
2001 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 809-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
K J Babbitt

I examined the effects of a nonlethal predator, larvae of the odonate Anax junius, and food-resource level on behaviour and growth of larval southern leopard frogs (Rana sphenocephala) to test whether the strength of effects of a nonlethal predator was influenced by background resource level. I crossed two levels of food resources, growth-limiting and non-growth-limiting, with the presence or absence of A. junius. Tadpoles responded to predators by altering spatial distribution and activity. When predators were present, tadpoles on both food treatments had similar low levels of activity, but tadpoles on the nonlimiting food treatment showed a much larger reduction in activity than tadpoles on the growth-limiting treatment. Tadpoles on both food treatments delayed metamorphosis when exposed to predators. Growth and size at metamorphosis were affected significantly by food treatment but not by predator treatment. However, the direction of response to predators differed. Tadpoles on the growth-limiting treatment were larger at metamorphosis and grew faster when exposed to predators; the opposite was true for tadpoles on the non-growth-limited food treatment. This raises the interesting possibility that for some species experiencing low resource availability, predators may induce a behaviourally mediated positive effect on growth.


Aquaculture ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 313 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 149-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clémentine Linard ◽  
Yannick Gueguen ◽  
Jacques Moriceau ◽  
Claude Soyez ◽  
Bélinda Hui ◽  
...  

Oikos ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (6) ◽  
pp. 724-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher A. Searcy ◽  
Helen Snaas ◽  
H. Bradley Shaffer

Biotropica ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 218-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca D. Tarvin ◽  
Catalina Silva Bermúdez ◽  
Venetia S. Briggs ◽  
Karen M. Warkentin

Copeia ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 1994 (2) ◽  
pp. 372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Newman ◽  
Arthur E. Dunham

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 680-700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Souhila Benmakrelouf ◽  
Cédric St-Onge ◽  
Nadjia Kara ◽  
Hanine Tout ◽  
Claes Edstrom ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Thomas Walsh

AbstractPlasticity in the timing of life history events and their impact on individual fitness, particularly the timing of and size at metamorphosis in animals with complex life cycles such as anuran amphibians, has long been of interest to ecologists. For different studies on life history plasticity to be comparable, there must be clearly defined and commonly agreed transition points, but it is unclear how consistently this is being performed in studies using anuran amphibians. In a review of 157 published studies, I found considerable variation in defining the end point of the larval phase. While a slight majority used the emergence of the forelimbs as the conclusion of the larval phase, some used a period within the developmental phase of metamorphic climax and others used the resorption of the tail. Studies included in this review, that assessed the same life history variable at two different developmental stages, reported some differences in results depending on which developmental stage was used. Recent evidence also shows that metamorphic climax is itself a period which can vary with environmental conditions, but, even in studies that included part or all of metamorphic climax in the larval phase, the treatment of individuals during metamorphic climax was not reported. Therefore, I argue that life history studies on anuran amphibians should distinguish the following phases: larval, metamorphic climax, juvenile, adult; that the end of the larval phase is best defined in ecological studies by forelimb emergence and that conditions under which individuals undergo metamorphic climax should be fully described.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document