Physiology of vibration-sensitive afferents in the femoral chordotonal organ of the stick insect

1999 ◽  
Vol 184 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Stein ◽  
A. E. Sauer
Keyword(s):  
Stick Insect ◽  
Chordotonal Organ

Intersegmental Coordination of Walking Movements in Stick Insects

2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 1255-1265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Björn Ch. Ludwar ◽  
Marie L. Göritz ◽  
Joachim Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Central Pattern Generators ◽  
Stick Insect ◽  
Neural Mechanisms ◽  
Chordotonal Organ ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Body Segments ◽  
Stick Insects ◽  
Pattern Generators ◽  
Leg Movements

Locomotion requires the coordination of movements across body segments, which in walking animals is expressed as gaits. We studied the underlying neural mechanisms of this coordination in a semi-intact walking preparation of the stick insect Carausius morosus. During walking of a single front leg on a treadmill, leg motoneuron (MN) activity tonically increased and became rhythmically modulated in the ipsilateral deafferented and deefferented mesothoracic (middle leg) ganglion. The pattern of modulation was correlated with the front leg cycle and specific for a given MN pool, although it was not consistent with functional leg movements for all MN pools. In an isolated preparation of a pair of ganglia, where one ganglion was made rhythmically active by application of pilocarpine, we found no evidence for coupling between segmental central pattern generators (CPGs) that could account for the modulation of MN activity observed in the semi-intact walking preparation. However, a third preparation provided evidence that signals from the front leg's femoral chordotonal organ (fCO) influenced activity of ipsilateral MNs in the adjacent mesothoracic ganglion. These intersegmental signals could be partially responsible for the observed MN activity modulation during front leg walking. While afferent signals from a single walking front leg modulate the activity of MNs in the adjacent segment, additional afferent signals, local or from contralateral or posterior legs, might be necessary to produce the functional motor pattern observed in freely walking animals.

scholarly journals Body side-specific changes in sensorimotor processing of movement feedback in a walking insect

2019 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 2173-2186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joscha Schmitz ◽  
Matthias Gruhn ◽  
Ansgar Büschges
Keyword(s):  
Stick Insect ◽  
The Body ◽  
Motor Output ◽  
Chordotonal Organ ◽  
Stimulus Velocity ◽  
Motor Processing ◽  
Sensorimotor Processing ◽  
Body Side ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Leg Kinematics

Feedback from load and movement sensors can modify timing and magnitude of the motor output in the stepping stick insect. One source of feedback is stretch reception by the femoral chordotonal organ (fCO), which encodes such parameters as the femorotibial (FTi) joint angle, the angular velocity, and its acceleration. Stimulation of the fCO causes a postural resistance reflex, during quiescence, and can elicit the opposite, so-called active reaction (AR), which assists ongoing flexion during active movements. In the present study, we investigated the role of fCO feedback for the difference in likelihood of generating ARs on the inside vs. the outside during curve stepping. We analyzed the effects of fCO stimulation on the motor output to the FTi and the neighboring coxa-trochanter and thorax-coxa joints of the middle leg. In inside and outside turns, the probability for ARs increases with increasing starting angle and decreasing stimulus velocity; furthermore, it is independent of the total angular excursion. However, the transition between stance and swing motor activity always occurs after a specific angular excursion, independent of the turning direction. Feedback from the fCO also has an excitatory influence on levator trochanteris motoneurons (MNs) during inside and outside turns, whereas the same feedback affects protractor coxae MNs only during outside steps. Our results suggest joint- and body side-dependent processing of fCO feedback. A shift in gain may be responsible for different AR probabilities between inside and outside turning, whereas the general control mechanism for ARs is unchanged. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We show that parameters of movement feedback from the tibia in an insect during curve walking are processed in a body side-specific manner, and how. From our results it is highly conceivable that the difference in motor response to the feedback supports the body side-specific leg kinematics during turning. Future studies will need to determine the source for the inputs that determine the local changes in sensory-motor processing.

Load Signals Assist the Generation of Movement-Dependent Reflex Reversal in the Femur–Tibia Joint of Stick Insects

2006 ◽  
Vol 96 (6) ◽  
pp. 3532-3537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Turgay Akay ◽  
Ansgar Büschges
Keyword(s):  
Time Course ◽  
Stick Insect ◽  
Motor Output ◽  
Chordotonal Organ ◽  
Frequency Of Occurrence ◽  
Stick Insects ◽  
Extensor Motoneuron ◽  
Motoneuron Activity ◽  
First Time ◽  
Stimulation Of

Reinforcement of movement is an important mechanism by which sensory feedback contributes to motor control for walking. We investigate how sensory signals from movement and load sensors interact in controlling the motor output of the stick insect femur–tibia (FT) joint. In stick insects, flexion signals from the femoral chordotonal organ (fCO) at the FT joint and load signals from the femoral campaniform sensilla (fCS) are known to individually reinforce stance-phase motor output of the FT joint by promoting flexor and inhibiting extensor motoneuron activity. We quantitatively compared the time course of inactivation in extensor tibiae motoneurons in response to selective stimulation of fCS and fCO. Stimulation of either sensor generates extensor activity in a qualitatively similar manner but with a significantly different time course and frequency of occurrence. Inactivation of extensor motoneurons arising from fCS stimulation was more reliable but more than threefold slower compared with the extensor inactivation in response to flexion signals from the fCO. In contrast, simultaneous stimulation of both sense organs produced inactivation in motoneurons with a time course typical for fCO stimulation alone, but with a frequency of occurrence characteristic for fCS stimulation. This increase in probability of occurrence was also accompanied by a delayed reactivation of the extensor motoneurons. Our results indicate for the first time that load signals from the leg affect the processing of movement-related feedback in controlling motor output.

Multimodal Convergence of Presynaptic Afferent Inhibition in Insect Proprioceptors

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 512-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Stein ◽  
Josef Schmitz
Keyword(s):  
Presynaptic Inhibition ◽  
Sensory Information ◽  
Reversal Potential ◽  
Stick Insect ◽  
Chordotonal Organ ◽  
Primary Afferent Depolarization ◽  
Campaniform Sensilla ◽  
Sense Organs ◽  
Position Sensitive ◽  
Conductance Increase

In the leg motor system of insects, several proprioceptive sense organs provide the CNS with information about posture and movement. Within one sensory organ, presynaptic inhibition shapes the inflow of sensory information to the CNS. We show here that also different proprioceptive sense organs can exert a presynaptic inhibition on each other. The afferents of one leg proprioceptor in the stick insect, either the position-sensitive femoral chordotonal organ or the load-sensitive campaniform sensilla, receive a primary afferent depolarization (PAD) from two other leg proprioceptors, the campaniform sensilla and/or the coxal hairplate. The reversal potential of this PAD is about −59 mV, and the PAD is associated with a conductance increase. The properties of this presynaptic input support the hypothesis that this PAD acts as presynaptic inhibition. The PAD reduces the amplitude of afferent action potentials and thus likely also afferent transmitter release and synaptic efficacy. These findings imply that PAD mechanisms of arthropod proprioceptors might be as complex as in vertebrates.

Role of Proprioceptive Signals From an Insect Femur-Tibia Joint in Patterning Motoneuronal Activity of an Adjacent Leg Joint

1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 1856-1865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dietmar Hess ◽  
Ansgar Büschges
Keyword(s):  
Movement Control ◽  
Stick Insect ◽  
Control Mode ◽  
Chordotonal Organ ◽  
Joint Control ◽  
Muscarinic Agonist ◽  
Behavioral State ◽  
Sensory Signals ◽  
Motoneuron Activity

Role of proprioceptive signals from an insect femur-tibia joint in patterning motoneuronal activity of an adjacent leg joint. Interjoint reflex function of the insect leg contributes to postural control at rest or to movement control during locomotor movements. In the stick insect ( Carausius morosus), we investigated the role that sensory signals from the femoral chordotonal organ (fCO), the transducer of the femur-tibia (FT) joint, play in patterning motoneuronal activity in the adjacent coxa-trochanteral (CT) joint when the joint control networks are in the movement control mode of the active behavioral state. In the active behavioral state, sensory signals from the fCO induced transitions of activity between antagonistic motoneuron pools, i.e., the levator trochanteris and the depressor trochanteris motoneurons. As such, elongation of the fCO, signaling flexion of the FT joint, terminated depressor motoneuron activity and initiated activity in levator motoneurons. Relaxation of the fCO, signaling extension of the FT joint, induced the opposite transition by initiating depressor motoneuron activity and terminating levator motoneuron activity. This interjoint influence of sensory signals from the fCO was independent of the generation of the intrajoint reflex reversal in the FT joint, i.e., the “active reaction,” which is released by elongation signals from the fCO. The generation of these transitions in activity of trochanteral motoneurons barely depended on position or velocity signals from the fCO. This contrasts with the situation in the resting behavioral state when interjoint reflex action markedly depends on actual fCO stimulus parameters, i.e., position and velocity signals. In the active behavioral state, movement signals from the fCO obviously trigger or release centrally generated transitions in motoneuron activity, e.g., by affecting central rhythm generating networks driving trochanteral motoneuron pools. This conclusion was tested by stimulating the fCO in “fictive rhythmic” preparations, activated by the muscarinic agonist pilocarpine in the otherwise isolated and deafferented mesothoracic ganglion. In this situation, sensory signals from the fCO did in fact reset and entrain rhythmic activity in trochanteral motoneurons. The results indicate for the first time that when the stick insect locomotor system is active, sensory signals from the proprioceptor of one leg joint, i.e., the fCO, pattern motor activity in an adjacent leg joint, i.e., the CT joint, by affecting the central rhythm generating network driving the motoneurons of the adjacent joint.

Contributions of structure and innervation pattern of the stick insect extensor tibiae muscle to the filter characteristics of the muscle-joint system

1996 ◽  
Vol 199 (10) ◽  
pp. 2185-2198 ◽  
Author(s):  
U Bässler ◽  
W Stein
Keyword(s):  
Distal Portion ◽  
Stick Insect ◽  
Extensor Muscle ◽  
Chordotonal Organ ◽  
Movement Amplitude ◽  
Joint System ◽  
Pass Filter ◽  
Low Pass Filter ◽  
Flexor Muscles ◽  
Stimulation Of

It is shown that the low-pass filter characteristics of the muscle­joint system of the femur­tibia joint of the stick insect Cuniculina impigra result from co-contraction of the extensor and flexor tibiae muscles. The most distal region of the extensor muscle, which contains a high percentage of slow muscle fibres, is involved in this co-contraction. This conclusion results from the following evidence. (1) Inertial and friction forces do not affect the characteristics of the low-pass filter of the muscle­joint system. (2) There is some co-contraction of the extensor and flexor muscles during sinusoidal stimulation of the femoral chordotonal organ at high stimulus frequencies. Both muscles generate tonic forces that increase with increasing stimulus frequency and also increase with time from the beginning of stimulation until a plateau is reached. (3) For the extensor muscle, this tonic force is produced by its most distal portion only. (4) Electrical stimulation of the common inhibitory motoneurone (CI1) reduces the tonic force generated in this most distal portion of the extensor muscle. Therefore, CI1 stimulation reduces the amplitude of tibial movement in response to sinusoidal stimulation of the femoral chordotonal organ at stimulus frequencies below 0.5 Hz (over this frequency range, the tibial movement amplitude is a function of the force amplitude produced by the whole extensor muscle and there is no co-contraction), but at chordotonal organ stimulus frequencies of 1 Hz and above, CI1 stimulation increases the tibial movement amplitude (in this case, movement amplitude is limited by the degree of co-contraction of the extensor and flexor muscles). With repeated chordotonal organ stimulation at higher stimulus frequencies, the tibial movement amplitude steadily decreases. This must be a consequence of increasing levels of co-contraction of the extensor and flexor muscles, since at low stimulus frequencies (no co-contraction) there is no reduction in movement amplitude during repeated stimulations. It is concluded that co-contraction of the extensor and flexor tibiae muscles prevents instability in the reflex loop in spite of the high gain necessary for the generation of catalepsy. Therefore, the mechanism described can be considered to be an adaptation to the ecological niche occupied by this animal. The contribution of the distal part of the extensor muscle to this system can be switched off by the CI1 during active movements.

Temporal Differences between Load and Movement Signal Integration in the Sensorimotor Network of an Insect Leg

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corinna Gebehart ◽  
Ansgar Büschges
Keyword(s):  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Stick Insect ◽  
Feedback Signal ◽  
Chordotonal Organ ◽  
Signal Integration ◽  
Sensory Stimuli ◽  
Temporal Differences ◽  
Sensorimotor Network ◽  
Load Sensing ◽  
And Function

Nervous systems face a torrent of sensory inputs, including proprioceptive feedback. Signal integration depends on spatially and temporally coinciding signals. It is unclear how relative time delays affect multimodal signal integration from spatially distant sense organs. We measured transmission times and latencies along all processing stages of sensorimotor pathways in the stick insect leg muscle control system using intra- and extracellular recordings. Transmission times of signals from load-sensing tibial and trochanterofemoral campaniform sensilla (tiCS, tr/fCS) to the premotor network were longer than from the movement-sensing femoral chordotonal organ (fCO). We characterized connectivity patterns from tiCS, tr/fCS, and fCO afferents to identified premotor nonspiking interneurons (NSIs) and motor neurons (MNs) by distinguishing short- and long-latency responses to sensory stimuli. Functional NSI connectivity depended on sensory context. The timeline of concurrent tiCS and fCO signals had an early phase of movement signal influences and delayed load influences. Temporal differences persisted into MN activity and muscle force development. We demonstrate a temporal difference in the processing of two distinct sensory modalities generated by the sensorimotor network and affecting motor output. The reported temporal differences in sensory processing and signal integration improve our understanding of sensory network computation and function in motor control.

Activity-Dependent Sensitivity of Proprioceptive Sensory Neurons in the Stick Insect Femoral Chordotonal Organ

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (5) ◽  
pp. 2387-2398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph A. DiCaprio ◽  
Harald Wolf ◽  
Ansgar Büschges
Keyword(s):  
Sensory Neurons ◽  
Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Stick Insect ◽  
Chordotonal Organ ◽  
Afferent Neurons ◽  
Generator Potential ◽  
Slow Adaptation ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Mechanical Factors ◽  
Stimulation Of

Mechanosensory neurons exhibit a wide range of dynamic changes in response, including rapid and slow adaptation. In addition to mechanical factors, electrical processes may also contribute to sensory adaptation. We have investigated adaptation of afferent neurons in the stick insect femoral chordotonal organ (fCO). The fCO contains sensory neurons that respond to position, velocity, and acceleration of the tibia. We describe the influence of random mechanical stimulation of the fCO on the response of fCO afferent neurons. The activity of individual sensory neurons was recorded intracellularly from their axons in the main leg nerve. Most fCO afferents (93%) exhibited a marked decrease in response to trapezoidal stimuli following sustained white noise stimulation (bandwidth = 60 Hz, amplitudes from ±5 to ±30°). Concurrent decreases in the synaptic drive to leg motoneurons and interneurons were also observed. Electrical stimulation of spike activity in individual fCO afferents in the absence of mechanical stimulation also led to a dramatic decrease in response in 15 of 19 afferents tested. This indicated that electrical processes are involved in the regulation of the generator potential or encoding of action potentials and partially responsible for the decreased response of the afferents. Replacing Ca2+ with Ba2+ in the saline surrounding the fCO greatly reduced or blocked the decrease in response elicited by electrically induced activity or mechanical stimulation when compared with control responses. Our results indicate that activity of fCO sensory neurons strongly affects their sensitivity, most likely via Ca2+-dependent processes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document