New stationary phases for normal-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (NP-HPLC)

1998 ◽  
Vol 360 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 763-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralf L. Deisenhofer ◽  
K. Ballschmiter
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 1250
Author(s):  
Takafumi Onishi ◽  
Weston J. Umstead

The increased use and applicability of Cannabis and Cannabis-derived products has skyrocketed over the last 5 years. With more and more governing bodies moving toward medical and recreational legalization, the need for robust and reliable analytical testing methods is also growing. While many stationary phases and methods have been developed for this sort of analysis, chiral stationary phases (CSPs) are unique in this area; not only can they serve their traditional chiral separation role, but they can also be used to perform achiral separations. Given that mixtures of cannabinoids routinely contain enantiomers, diastereomers, and structural isomers, this offers an advantage over the strictly achiral-only analyses. This work presents the separation of a 10-cannabinoid mixture on several polysaccharide-based sub-2 µm CSPs with both normal-phase and reversed-phase ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) conditions. Along with the separation of the mixture, appropriate single-peak identification was performed to determine the elution order and reported where applicable.


Molecules ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (13) ◽  
pp. 2425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsunehisa Hirose ◽  
Daniel Keck ◽  
Yoshihiro Izumi ◽  
Takeshi Bamba

The retention behavior of a wide variety of stationary phases was compared in supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) and normal-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (NP-HPLC). We also attempted to elucidate the retention behavior in SFC by investigating the selectivity of the different stationary phases. SFC separation conditions with polar stationary phases, such as silica gel (SL) and diol (Diol) phases, operate via adsorptions that include hydrophilic and ionic interactions similar to those in NP-HPLC. Moreover, non-polar stationary phases, such as pentabromophenyl (PBr), pyrenylethyl (PYE), and octadecyl (C18), could be used despite the non-polar mobile phase conditions, because the dispersion and π-π interactions were stronger in SFC than in HPLC. These results reflect the selectivity of the stationary phase and its retention factor, thus providing useful information for the selection of appropriate stationary phases for particular analytes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document