scholarly journals The North Shore-Long Island Jewish Research Institute

2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 63-64
2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinmin Zhang ◽  
Qiang Hua Chen ◽  
Peter Farmer ◽  
Mansoor Nasim ◽  
Alexis Demopoulos ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 138 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Greller ◽  
Allan J. Lindberg ◽  
Maureen E. Levine ◽  
Lois A. Lindberg
Keyword(s):  

CHEST Journal ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 559A
Author(s):  
Alan S. Multz ◽  
Erfan Hussain ◽  
Lori Steir ◽  
Karen Miller ◽  
Marcella Degeronimo ◽  
...  

1938 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
James D. Burggraf

The coast of Long Island is dotted with shellheaps, both large and small, of which all but a few are true kitchen middens of the pre-white contact period. This is particularly true of the region investigated by the writer, from the New York City line to Stony Brook on the North Shore. In only one heap examined prior to 1936 did a single artifact of European origin present itself. In that instance, a badly corroded triangular arrow of iron was found in a pit surrounded by deep deposits of shell and other refuse that contained not one fragment of metal, glass, or crockery. In this heap the majority of arrow points were of local quartz, and triangular in pattern. The pottery was abundant, and though most sherds were of typical Long Island Algonkin vessels, there was a fair amount of definitely Iroquoian ware including a small, nearly complete, square-collared pot that cannot be distinguished from a Mohawk Valley specimen.


1968 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 322-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bert Salwen

AbstractMuskeeta Cove 2 is a stratified, two-component Woodland site on the north shore of Long Island in Glen Cove, Nassau County, New York. The earlier occupation, in the upper 6 in. of a glacial sand zone, is attributed, on the evidence of its ceramic content, to the earlier segment of the Windsor tradition, most probably its North Beach focus. The second occupation, in a thin layer of black midden earth and shell overlying the sand, is more difficult to identify culturally. By many criteria, most of its pottery can be assigned to the Bowmans Brook focus of the East River tradition, but this assemblage is most distinctive for the disconcerting way in which it blends Bowmans Brook ceramic traits with those of the contemporary Sebonac (Windsor) and Canandaigua (Owasco) foci—often on the same sherds. This mixture of traits has prompted the suggestion that, in this boundary region at least, the generally accepted invasion-replacement relationship between East River and Windsor must be reexamined. After analysis of the pottery from this site, in which the distributions of individual modes as well as their combinations into whole types are considered, a new hypothesis is tentatively advanced: Early East River pottery is seen as the result of the blending of Sebonac, Canandaigua, and central New Jersey decorative modes on vessels with the constricted necks and elongateglobular bodies that were the dominant formal horizon markers throughout the entire region at this time level. Diffusion, rather than invasion, would appear to be the central process here.


1990 ◽  
Vol 117 (4) ◽  
pp. 450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Greller ◽  
David C. Locke ◽  
Victoria Kilanowski ◽  
G. Elizabeth Lotowycz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document