scholarly journals Reinforcement-Based Response Elimination: The Effects Of Response-Reinforcement Interval and Response Specificity

1985 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 365-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart Vyse ◽  
Thomas S. Rieg ◽  
Nelson F. Smith
2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 554-562
Author(s):  
Alica Thissen ◽  
Frank M. Spinath ◽  
Nicolas Becker

Abstract. The cube construction task represents a novel format in the assessment of spatial ability through mental cube rotation tasks. Instead of selecting the correct answer from several response options, respondents construct their own response in a computerized test environment, leading to a higher demand for spatial ability. In the present study with a sample of 146 German high-school students, we tested an approach to manipulate the item difficulties in order to create items with a greater difficulty range. Furthermore, we compared the cube task in a distractor-free and a distractor-based version while the item stems were held identical. The average item difficulty of the distractor-free format was significantly higher than in the distractor-based format ( M = 0.27 vs. M = 0.46) and the distractor-free format showed a broader range of item difficulties (.02 ≤  pi ≤ .95 vs. .37 ≤  pi ≤ .63). The analyses of the test results also showed that the distractor-free format had a significantly higher correlation with a broad intelligence test ( r = .57 vs. r = .17). Reasons for the higher convergent validity of the distractor-free format (prevention of response elimination strategies and the broader range of item difficulties) and further research possibilities are discussed.


2007 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam H. Doughty ◽  
Stephanie P. da Silva ◽  
Kennon A. Lattal
Keyword(s):  

1973 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 307-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward W. C. McAllister

The present experiment tested the effects of reinforcement type (stimulus term, response term, and stimulus-response pairs) and type of recall-retention test (stimulus type or response type) as between- S variables and delay-of-reinforcement interval as a within- S variable on retention in paired-associate learning. The analysis showed that type of reinforcement and delay-of-reinforcement interval resulted in significant effects. Type of recall-retention test was not significant and interactions were nonsignificant.


2011 ◽  
pp. 205-230
Author(s):  
Donald J. Lewis
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catalina N. Rey ◽  
Eric A. Thrailkill ◽  
Kate L. Goldberg ◽  
Mark E. Bouton

1952 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 256-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOHN I. LACEY ◽  
DOROTHY E. BATEMAN ◽  
RUTH Van LEHN

2013 ◽  
Vol 110 (10) ◽  
pp. 4140-4145 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Young ◽  
J. C. W. Locke ◽  
M. B. Elowitz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document