…but protective agents have an important role in antiulcer therapy

InPharma ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 580 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-4
2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan ◽  
Jiang ◽  
Zhang ◽  
Bai

In efforts to identify naturally occurring compounds that act as protective agents, resveratrol, a phytoalexin existing in wine, has attracted much interest because of its diverse pharmacological characteristics. Considering that apoptosis induction is the most potent defense approach for cancer treatment, we have tried to summarize our present understanding of apoptosis induction by resveratrol based on the two major apoptosis pathways.


1957 ◽  
Vol 227 (1) ◽  
pp. 339-345
Author(s):  
Alexander Pihl ◽  
Lorentz Eldjarn ◽  
Jon Bremer

Author(s):  
Alexey A. Tinkov ◽  
Thuy T. Nguyen ◽  
Abel Santamaria ◽  
Aaron B. Bowman ◽  
Aleksandra Buha Djordjevic ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Maurizio Battino ◽  
Tamara Y. Forbes-Hernandez ◽  
Francesca Giampieri

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2533
Author(s):  
Kinga Głuchowska ◽  
Tomasz Dzieciątkowski ◽  
Aleksandra Sędzikowska ◽  
Anna Zawistowska-Deniziak ◽  
Daniel Młocicki

It is possible that parasites may influence the course of COVID-19 infection, as either risk factors or protective agents; as such, the current coronavirus pandemic may affect the diagnosis and prevention of parasitic disease, and its elimination programs. The present review highlights the similarity between the symptoms of human parasitoses and those of COVID-19 and discuss their mutual influence. The study evaluated selected human parasitoses with similar symptoms to COVID-19 and examined their potential influence on SARS-CoV-2 virus invasion. The available data suggest that at least several human parasitoses could result in misdiagnosis of COVID-19. Some disorders, such as malaria, schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminths, can increase the risk of severe infection with COVID-19. It is also suggested that recovery from parasitic disease can enhance the immune system and protect from COVID-19 infection. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic has affected parasitic disease elimination programs in endemic regions and influenced the number of diagnoses of human parasitoses.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Jeyaprakash ◽  
S Sangha ◽  
K Robeldo ◽  
K Ellenberger ◽  
S Sivapathan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Anthracycline (ANT)-based chemotherapy for breast malignancies have significantly improved cancer outcomes. However, the cardiotoxicity induced by ANTs in the breast cancer population has increased major adverse cardiac events. While randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have explored different primary preventative agents to confer cardio-protection pre chemotherapy, comparisons between agents has been limited. It is unclear which drug is the most efficacious in preserving Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) amongst this population. Purpose To perform a network meta-analysis of RCTs comparing the impact on LVEF of various prophylactic cardio-protective agents, when prescribed to breast cancer patients prior to ANT-based chemotherapy. Methods Two independent authors performed a literature search as per the PRISMA guidelines using four databases (CENTRAL, Cochrane Reviews, MEDLINE, SCOPUS), to find RCTS evaluating cardio protective agents. The trial population was limited to patients with breast cancer without prior ANT exposure. Trials were only included if the cardio-protective agents were commenced prior to ANT dosing. The assessed outcome was a mean change in LVEF pre and post ANT dosing, compared to placebo prevention. Extracted data included age, ANT dose, and LVEF pre and post chemotherapy. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to appraise included RCTs. Results From 2807 search results, we identified twelve RCTs which evaluated 1126 patients. Seven studies assessed beta-blockers alone and two assessed combination ACE inhibitors and beta blockers. Individual studies assessing ACE inhibitors, spironolactone or rosuvastatin alone were also included. All patients were female with an average age of 50.5 and average ANT dose of 412 mg/m2. Our network meta-analysis showed beta-blockers showed significant protection with higher LVEF than placebo by 2.38% [0.52, 4.25]. ACE inhibitors showed a similar magnitude of LVEF preservation 2.59% [−0.20, 5.38] but not statistically significant due to wider CI because of lower sample size (n=250). Spironolactone showed a statistically significant preservation in LVEF by 12.80% [3.44, 22.16], however this was based on a single study (n=83), with marked measurement bias and deviations from intended intervention. All included trials had an intermediate or high risk of bias, with marked heterogeneity in ANT dosing and LVEF monitoring. Conclusion Beta-blockers minimise LVEF decline when administered prior to anthracycline chemotherapy, compared against alternate agents. Data may be underpowered to demonstrate the benefit of ACE inhibitor and combination beta blocker/ACE inhibitor prescription. The quality of RCT data to date is limited by a high risk of bias and significant heterogeneity between RCA reporting. This analysis is likely to inform clinical practice, and allow clinicians to prescribe primary cardio-protection in patients at high risk of cardiotoxicity. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document