scholarly journals Intellectual property protection and the globalization of the world economy

1996 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-26
Author(s):  
Matthias Zeeb
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
World Economy ◽  
Intellectual Property Protection ◽  
The World

scholarly journals Modern trends and problems of the global intellectual property market development

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 396-409
Author(s):  
T. G. Filosofova
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
World Economy ◽  
The United States ◽  
Assistive Technologies ◽  
Creative Industries ◽  
Property Market ◽  
The World ◽  
Effective Development ◽  
The Right

It is shown that active processes of digitalization and development of creative industries form new trends of the world economy development. Possession of the right to use IP, in particular the results of the latest scientific research and technological developments (especially in the field of artificial intelligence, the Internet of things, blockchain, processing large databases, quantum computing systems, cloud technologies, etc.) significantly expands the capabilities of the owner of IP rights in world economy, its participation in global value chains. Intellectual property is becoming not only the main instrument of socio-economic development, but also the center of global technological confrontation and a fierce struggle for the right to own it, a significant factor of success in geoeconomic competition. The main long-term trend in the development of world IP markets is the dynamic growth of the volume of commercial transactions with goods and services containing IP objects with a significant expansion of the range of the latter. The IP market is growing at a rate exceeding the rate of growth of “material” markets. The countryleader in the number of valid patents for a long period is the United States. The main competitor for the United States is China. Among the main technological trends, the development of the IP market in terms of assistive technologies should be highlighted, which allow producing products according to digital description anywhere in the world. A large share of the IP markets is occupied by trade in licenses. It is shown that for the further successful and effective development of IP markets, it is necessary to take into account the prospects for the functioning of IP markets and the movement of goods containing IP objects in a new technological order.

scholarly journals Intellectual Property Protection of Indigenous Peoples in Indonesia: Quo Vadis?

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Anis Mashdurohatun ◽  
Ariy Khaerudin ◽  
Teguh Prasetyo
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Indigenous People ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Intellectual Property Protection ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The World ◽  
Quo Vadis ◽  
Traditional Cultural Expressions

Illicit used of intellectual property protection of indigenous peoples which are increasingly exploitative and leaving the existing values, and it’s happen over the world. Paradox government need it for raw material in creative economic but there’s no law to protect. The aim of this study is to describe dilemma of law patronage for Intellectual property of Indigenous People. Method for this study used library research. The values of justice in the use of traditional cultural expressions are carried out proportionally and balanced by harmonizing the values of individuals with communal values. Based on it ought to palladium with legal system that preserve behalf indigenous peoples in order to achieve legal objectives (Justice, certainty and expediency).  

scholarly journals Intellectual Property Management in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 109-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Valdivino Rocha Lima ◽  
João Antonio Belmino dos Santos
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
World Economy ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Property Management ◽  
Empirical Knowledge ◽  
Good Practices ◽  
Management Actions ◽  
Intellectual Property Management ◽  
The World

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have been prominent in the world economy, contributing significantly to the generation of jobs. Despite the relevance in the economy, SMEs underutilize the mechanisms of protection and appropriation of intellectual property. In order to gather and synthesize strategies, managerial models and good practices related to the intellectual property management in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), this article aims to analyze systematically the literature, as well as to identify important aspects and gaps in existing empirical knowledge. For this, 53 articles from periodicals indexed in the scientific bases Web of Science, Scopus and Science Direct were analyzed. It was verified that there is a pattern of management actions in the scope of SMEs with regard to the protection, appropriation and intellectual property management.

scholarly journals Critical Theory vs. “Mostmodernism”

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 69-77
Author(s):  
William L. Krayer
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Critical Theory ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Ways Of Knowing ◽  
Intellectual Property Protection ◽  
Marginalized Communities ◽  
Copyright Laws ◽  
The World ◽  
Material Progress

Critical Theory holds that capitalism privatizes the benefits of knowledge through systems of patent and copyright laws, leaving marginalized communities alienated not only from material progress but from “ways of knowing and relating to the world.” Critical theorists have it backward, and that the system of intellectual property protection has allowed continuous improvements in science and technology to the benefit of all.

scholarly journals Do Multinationals Make GDP Obsolete?

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 53-57
Author(s):  
F. Lequiller
Keyword(s):  
Economic Policy ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
World Economy ◽  
National Accounts ◽  
Essential Tool ◽  
The World ◽  
Income Approach

Multinationals play an increasingly important role in the world economy. Their fiscal optimization leads to bias macroeconomic statistics. This was ignored by statisticians until the Irish CSO published an extraordinary +27% growth number for 2015. This originates most probably from a simple administrative reallocation in Dublin of the intellectual property products of a big American multinational. As royalties are classified as production in national accounts and exports are registered not from where they are physically shipped but from the country that holds their property rights, GDP was massively impacted.Many economists were thunderstruck. Some concluded that a «national» GDP is now obsolete. Some that only its income approach remains relevant. In this article, the author strongly advocates that a national GDP in volume remains an essential tool for economic policy and that, if necessary, statisticians should reconsider the rules of the SNA 2008, whether to classify royalties as production or to extrapolate the goods for processing concept, in order to recover a sensible measure of growth. 

WTO Negotiations with Respect to Geographical Indications and Russia's Position on the Protection of Appellations of Origin

2004 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 475-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Vergano ◽  
Irina Kireeva
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Present Article ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Intellectual Property Protection ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Appellations Of Origin ◽  
Parma Ham ◽  
The World ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Current Stage

AbstractThe present article examines the current stage of the WTO negotiations with respect to the protection of geographical indications (GIs). GIs are distinctive signs that associate products of quality and reputation with their place or area of production and, thereby, help identify and distinguish such products on the market. Well-known examples of geographical indications include Irish Whiskey, Gorgonzola, Tequila, Bordeaux, Roquefort, Antigua Coffee, and Parma Ham. This article examines the manner in which geographical indications are protected in the Russian Federation. Russia considers protection of this type of intellectual property to be one of the key TRIPs issues and is seen to fully support the position of those countries that are demanding enhanced protection of geographical indications around the world. One of the major problems in respect to the protection of intellectual property in Russia is the fact that enforcement of intellectual property laws has—thus far—been rather limited. In conclusion, the authors suggest that Russia's entry into the WTO will prove benefi cial to both Russia itself and to other WTO Members with respect to intellectual property protection.

scholarly journals INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IS THE POTENTIAL FOR INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF UKRAINE

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-83
Author(s):  
Volodymyr KHAUSTOV ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Protection ◽  
Intellectual Property Right ◽  
Industrial Property ◽  
High Position ◽  
Global Innovation ◽  
The World ◽  
The Eu

Socio-economic development of Ukraine in the medium and long term is impossible without a radical reform of intellectual property as a basis for intensifying innovation processes. The generalization of tendencies and experience of the leading countries of the world concerning creation, protection and commercialization of objects of the intellectual property right revealed the strong and weak positions of Ukraine. Thus, Ukraine is in the group of leading countries in the generalized indicator of activity for filing applications for industrial property by country of origin, has a high position of the relevant indicators of the Global Innovation Index for 2020. Domestic inventors retain the potential to create objects of intellectual property rights mainly for protection in the domestic market: the number of applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty system does not exceed 200, which is 320 times less than the inventors of China. However, the gross expenditure on R&D in GDP is 6-10 times lower than in the leading countries of the world. The low level of the national system of intellectual property protection is evidenced by the fact that Ukraine is under the supervision of the Office of the US Trade Representative and in the EU Priority Watch List, which includes countries with the most serious problems in the field of intellectual property protection. The experience of the EU and the USA in the context of reforming the system of protection of intellectual property rights in the domestic and foreign markets, including counterfeiting, falsification, piracy and plagiarism, is important for Ukraine. The potential for the commercialization of intellectual property is evidenced by the high position of the relevant indicators of the Global Innovation Index, in particular on the export and import of intellectual property rights. The basis of Ukraine's innovation policy should be formed using a modern methodological approach based on demand, in particular, on public procurement, updating the regulatory environment, supporting private demand and more. This approach will facilitate the commercialization of R&D results and objects of intellectual property rights.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document