scholarly journals Textile agreement

1973 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 329-329
Keyword(s):  
2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 418-448
Author(s):  
Jimmy Howell

Globalization has done little to fight global poverty and inequality. Though some critics have used this fact to argue against global economic integration, this article explains that those in favor of a freer and fairer global trade and finance system must link that regime with labor rights in order to achieve a reduction in global poverty and a more equitable distribution of trade gains. Without this connection, today's most powerful economies will be tomorrow's least relevant markets, finding themselves subordinate on the global supply chain to countries who were once thought of as “lesser developed.” This result will not come from increased development from those countries. Instead, it will derive from the erosion of progress in leading markets initiated by enhanced competition from countries with lower relative standards of living. Simply put: without a mechanism to increase those standards in the poorest countries, the richest countries will find their own standards retrograded in order to remain competitive. Accordingly, legal architectures must link free trade and global finance with core worker rights—or else.


Living Wage ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 122-142
Author(s):  
Shelley Marshall

Chapter 7 explores the formalisation of the Cambodian garment industry and the factors that have shaped and constrained the effectiveness of the combination of the US–Cambodia Bilateral Textile Agreement and the International Labour Organization’s Better Factories Project. Unlike the Mathadi Boards examined in Chapter 4, a great deal has been written about efforts to improve working standards in the Cambodian garment industry. The Chapter makes two important interventions in the already abundant literature on Better Factories Cambodia. Firstly, it focuses on the role of the trade agreement that led to the establishment of Better Factories Cambodia, as preferential treatment in trade played a critical part in encouraging investment in formal enterprises. It argues that trade incentives were just as important as the BFC in improving the labour standards of participating enterprises. Secondly, it examines the initiative in the context of Cambodia’s political economy showing how the Hun Sen government has used the initiative to its advantage and avoided investing in its own labour inspectorate. For this reason, the chapter asks whether Better Factories Cambodia has become a functional rival to the state labour inspectorate.


1974 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 37-37
Keyword(s):  

1936 ◽  
Vol 5 (21) ◽  
pp. 227-228
Author(s):  
M. S. F.
Keyword(s):  

1936 ◽  
Vol 5 (21) ◽  
pp. 227-228
Author(s):  
M. S. F.
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document