Response expectancies, treatment credibility, and hypnotic suggestibility: Mediator and moderator effects in hypnotic and cognitive-behavioral pain interventions

2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard S. Milling ◽  
Jessica S. Shores ◽  
Elizabeth L. Coursen ◽  
Deanna J. Menario ◽  
Catherine D. Farris
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Behavioral ◽  
Moderator Effects ◽  
Response Expectancies ◽  
Treatment Credibility

Motivation and treatment credibility predict alliance in cognitive behavioral treatment for youth with anxiety disorders in community clinics

2017 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 793-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. W. Fjermestad ◽  
M. D. Lerner ◽  
B. D. McLeod ◽  
G. J. H. Wergeland ◽  
B. S. M. Haugland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Behavioral Treatment ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral Treatment ◽  
Community Clinics ◽  
Treatment Credibility

scholarly journals Telemedicine versus face-to-face delivery of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial

SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Todd Arnedt ◽  
Deirdre A Conroy ◽  
Ann Mooney ◽  
Allison Furgal ◽  
Ananda Sen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Therapeutic Alliance ◽  
Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral ◽  
Daytime Functioning ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Insomnia Severity ◽  
Treatment Credibility

Abstract Study Objectives In a randomized controlled noninferiority trial, we compared face-to-face and telemedicine delivery (via the AASM SleepTM platform) of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for insomnia for improving insomnia/sleep and daytime functioning at posttreatment and 3-month follow-up. A secondary objective compared the modalities on treatment credibility, satisfaction, and therapeutic alliance. Methods A total of 65 adults with chronic insomnia (46 women, 47.2 ± 16.3 years of age) were randomized to 6 sessions of CBT for insomnia delivered individually via AASM SleepTM (n = 33, CBT-TM) or face-to-face (n = 32, CBT-F2F). Participants completed sleep diaries, the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and daytime functioning measures at pretreatment, posttreatment, and 3-month follow-up. Treatment credibility, satisfaction, and therapeutic alliance were compared between treatment modalities. The ISI was the primary noninferiority outcome. Results Based on a noninferiority margin of four points on the ISI and, after adjusting for confounders, CBT-TM was noninferior to CBT-F2F at posttreatment (β = 0.54, SE = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.64 to 2.72) and follow-up (β = 0.34, SE = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.83 to 2.53). Daytime functioning measures, except the physical composite scale of the SF-12, were significantly improved at posttreatment and follow-up, with no difference between treatment formats. CBT-TM sessions were, on average, nearly 10 min shorter, yet participant ratings of therapeutic alliance were similar to CBT-F2F. Conclusions Telemedicine delivery of CBT for insomnia is not inferior to face-to-face for insomnia severity and yields similar improvements on other sleep and daytime functioning outcomes. Further, telemedicine allows for more efficient treatment delivery while not compromising therapeutic alliance. Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT03293745

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Eating Disorders

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn Waller ◽  
Helen Cordery ◽  
Emma Corstorphine ◽  
Hendrik Hinrichsen ◽  
Rachel Lawson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Eating Disorders ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral

Low-Intensity Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-36
Author(s):  
Pascal Wabnitz ◽  
Michael Schulz ◽  
Michael Löhr ◽  
André Nienaber
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral ◽  
Low Intensity

Deciding the Adequacy of a Set of Tests for an Specific Assessment Situation. Decision-making Strategies

1996 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-22
Author(s):  
R. Esteve ◽  
A. Godoy
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Time Pressure ◽  
Response Mode ◽  
Information Load ◽  
Variable Pattern ◽  
Mode Effects ◽  
Moderator Effects ◽  
Specific Assessment ◽  
Information Board ◽  
Decision Importance

The aim of the present paper was to test the effects of response mode (choice vs. judgment) on decision-making strategies when subjects were faced with the task of deciding the adequacy of a set of tests for a specific assessment situation. Compared with choice, judgment was predicted to lead to more information sought, more time spent on the task, a less variable pattern of search, and a greater amount of interdimensional search. Three variables hypothesized as potential moderators of the response mode effects are also studied: time pressure, information load and decision importance. Using an information board, 300 subjects made decisions (choices and judgments) on tests for a concrete assessment situation, under high or low time pressure, high or low information load, and high or low decision importance. Response mode produced strong effects on all measures of decision behavior except for pattern of search. Moderator effects occurred for time pressure and information load.

A component analysis of cognitive-behavioral treatment for depression.

2000 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. np
Author(s):  
Keith S. Dobson ◽  
Paula A. Truax ◽  
Michael E. Addis ◽  
Kelly Koerner ◽  
Jackie K. Gollan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Treatment ◽  
Component Analysis ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral Treatment
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document