Tunnel enlargement after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring autografts

2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murat Ali Hersekli ◽  
Sercan Akpinar ◽  
Metin Ozalay ◽  
Gurkan Ozkoc ◽  
Necip Cesur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Patellar Tendon ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tunnel Enlargement ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Bone Patellar Tendon

Comparison of Three Techniques of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft: Differences in Anterior Tibial Translation and Tunnel Enlargement with Each Technique

2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 282-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironori Otsuka ◽  
Yasuyuki Ishibashi ◽  
Eiichi Tsuda ◽  
Kazuhiro Sasaki ◽  
Satoshi Toh
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Tunnel Enlargement ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Fixation Group ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Bone Patellar Tendon

Background: Anatomic fixation of the graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has improved stability of the reconstructed knee joint in experimental studies. Hypothesis: Anatomic fixation of the bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft will reduce tunnel enlargement and improve clinical results. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Methods: Sixty patients were randomly divided into three groups: a nonanatomic fixation group (traditional single-incision reconstruction), an anatomic fixation group (reconstruction in which a bone plug was grafted into the tibial tunnel), and an anatomic fixation group with all-inside reconstruction. Stability of the knee joint was examined with a KT-1000 arthrometer at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. At 12 months, anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were made to assess tunnel enlargement. Results: Although the magnitude of tibial displacement gradually increased after reconstruction in all three groups, the anatomic fixation group had significantly better stability than the groups undergoing nonanatomic fixation or all-inside anatomic fixation at 4 and 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. However, there was no significant difference between the three groups at 24 months. Regarding the tibial tunnel, residual rates and enlargement of tunnels were different between the reconstruction techniques. The nonanatomic reconstruction group had significantly greater tunnel enlargement. Conclusion: Anatomic fixation of the graft decreased the tunnel enlargement but had no effect on knee stability at 2-year follow-up.

Complications of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Constructs

2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 379-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew L. Busam ◽  
Matthew T. Provencher ◽  
Bernard R. Bach
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Patellar Tendon ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Correct Diagnosis ◽  
Careful Attention ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Bone Patellar Tendon

Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament is a common injury. Correct diagnosis and patient selection, along with proper surgical technique, with careful attention to anatomic graft placement, followed by attention to proper rehabilitation, leads to predictably good to excellent results. This article reviews the recognition and avoidance of complications associated with bone–patellar tendon–bone contructs of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document