Some comments on the individual risk model and multivariate extension

2001 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Walhin ◽  
J. Paris
Keyword(s):  
Risk Model ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Multivariate Extension ◽  
The Individual

scholarly journals A Functional Approach to Approximations for the Individual Risk Model

2004 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 379-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan M. Pitts
Keyword(s):  
Negative Binomial ◽  
Risk Model ◽  
Order Approximation ◽  
Functional Approach ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Claim Amount ◽  
Total Claim Amount ◽  
Total Claim ◽  
Binomial Approximation ◽  
The Individual

A functional approach is taken for the total claim amount distribution for the individual risk model. Various commonly used approximations for this distribution are considered, including the compound Poisson approximation, the compound binomial approximation, the compound negative binomial approximation and the normal approximation. These are shown to arise as zeroth order approximations in the functional set-up. By taking the derivative of the functional that maps the individual claim distributions onto the total claim amount distribution, new first order approximation formulae are obtained as refinements to the existing approximations. For particular choices of input, these new approximations are simple to calculate. Numerical examples, including the well-known Gerber portfolio, are considered. Corresponding approximations for stop-loss premiums are given.

scholarly journals Error Bounds for Compound Poisson Approximations of the Individual Risk Model

1992 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelson De Pril ◽  
Jan Dhaene
Keyword(s):  
Risk Model ◽  
General Setting ◽  
Poisson Model ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Compound Poisson ◽  
Aggregate Claims ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Stop Loss ◽  
Work Done

AbstractThe approximation of the individual risk model by a compound Poisson model plays an important role in computational risk theory. It is thus desirable to have sharp lower and upper bounds for the error resulting from this approximation if the aggregate claims distribution, related probabilities or stop-loss premiums are calculated.The aim of this paper is to unify the ideas and to extend to a more general setting the work done in this connection by Bühlmann et al. (1977), Gerber (1984) and others. The quality of the presented bounds is discussed and a comparison with the results of Hipp (1985) and Hipp & Michel (1990) is made.

scholarly journals An Appropriate Way to Switch from the Individual Risk Model to the Collective One

1993 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Kuon ◽  
M. Radtke ◽  
A. Reich
Keyword(s):  
Risk Model ◽  
Sufficient Conditions ◽  
Approximation Error ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Risk Models ◽  
Approximation Quality ◽  
Collective Risk Model ◽  
Collective Risk ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient

AbstractFor some time now, the convenient and fast calculability of collective risk models using the Panjer-algorithm has been a well-known fact, and indeed practitioners almost always make use of collective risk models in their daily numerical computations. In doing so, a standard link has been preferred for relating such calculations to the underlying heterogeneous risk portfolio and to the approximation of the aggregate claims distribution function in the individual risk model. In this procedure until now, the approximation quality of the collective risk model upon which such calculations are based is unknown.It is proved that the approximation error which arises does not converge to zero if the risk portfolio in question continues to grow. Therefore, necessary and sufficient conditions are derived in order to obtain well-adjusted collective risk models which supply convergent approximations. Moreover, it is shown how in practical situations the previous natural link between the individual and the collective risk model can easily be modified to improve its calculation accuracy. A numerical example elucidates this.

The individual risk model: a compound distribution

1989 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Verrall
Keyword(s):  
Risk Model ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Risk Models ◽  
Collective Models ◽  
Collective Risk Model ◽  
Collective Risk ◽  
Compound Distribution ◽  
Compound Binomial ◽  
Mean And Variance ◽  
The Individual

The two approaches to modelling aggregate claims—the individual and the collective models—have been regarded as arising by considering a portfolio of policies in different ways. The individual risk model (IRM) is derived by considering the claims on individual policies and summing over all policies in the portfolio, while the collective risk model (CRM) is derived from the portfolio as a whole. This is sometimes held to be the main difference between the IRM and the CRM. In fact the IRM can be derived in exactly the same way as the CRM and can be regarded as a compound binomial distribution. This makes a unified treatment of risk models possible, simplifies the calculation of the mean and variance of the IRM, and facilitates the calculation of higher moments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document