No random reals in countable support iterations

1995 ◽  
Vol 92 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 349-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haim Judah ◽  
Miroslav Repický
Keyword(s):  
Countable Support ◽  
Random Reals

Shelah's work on non-semi-proper iterations, II

2001 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 1865-1883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaz Schlindwein
Keyword(s):  
Closed Subset ◽  
Stationary Subset ◽  
Finite Support ◽  
Countable Support ◽  
Final Model ◽  
Axiom A ◽  
Mahlo Cardinal ◽  
The One ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Special Case

One of the main goals in the theory of forcing iteration is to formulate preservation theorems for not collapsing ω1 which are as general as possible. This line leads from c.c.c. forcings using finite support iterations to Axiom A forcings and proper forcings using countable support iterations to semi-proper forcings using revised countable support iterations, and more recently, in work of Shelah, to yet more general classes of posets. In this paper we concentrate on a special case of the very general iteration theorem of Shelah from [5, chapter XV]. The class of posets handled by this theorem includes all semi-proper posets and also includes, among others, Namba forcing.In [5, chapter XV] Shelah shows that, roughly, revised countable support forcing iterations in which the constituent posets are either semi-proper or Namba forcing or P[W] (the forcing for collapsing a stationary co-stationary subset ofwith countable conditions) do not collapse ℵ1. The iteration must contain sufficiently many cardinal collapses, for example, Levy collapses. The most easily quotable combinatorial application is the consistency (relative to a Mahlo cardinal) of ZFC + CH fails + whenever A ∪ B = ω2 then one of A or B contains an uncountable sequentially closed subset. The iteration Shelah uses to construct this model is built using P[W] to “attack” potential counterexamples, Levy collapses to ensure that the cardinals collapsed by the various P[W]'s are sufficiently well separated, and Cohen forcings to ensure the failure of CH in the final model.In this paper we give details of the iteration theorem, but we do not address the combinatorial applications such as the one quoted above.These theorems from [5, chapter XV] are closely related to earlier work of Shelah [5, chapter XI], which dealt with iterated Namba and P[W] without allowing arbitrary semi-proper forcings to be included in the iteration. By allowing the inclusion of semi-proper forcings, [5, chapter XV] generalizes the conjunction of [5, Theorem XI.3.6] with [5, Conclusion XI.6.7].

CHAITIN’S Ω AS A CONTINUOUS FUNCTION

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 486-510
Author(s):  
RUPERT HÖLZL ◽  
WOLFGANG MERKLE ◽  
JOSEPH MILLER ◽  
FRANK STEPHAN ◽  
LIANG YU
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Function ◽  
Hausdorff Dimension ◽  
Universal Machine ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Turing Complete ◽  
Random Reals

AbstractWe prove that the continuous function${\rm{\hat \Omega }}:2^\omega \to $ that is defined via$X \mapsto \mathop \sum \limits_n 2^{ - K\left( {Xn} \right)} $ for all $X \in {2^\omega }$ is differentiable exactly at the Martin-Löf random reals with the derivative having value 0; that it is nowhere monotonic; and that $\mathop \smallint \nolimits _0^1{\rm{\hat{\Omega }}}\left( X \right)\,{\rm{d}}X$ is a left-c.e. $wtt$-complete real having effective Hausdorff dimension ${1 / 2}$.We further investigate the algorithmic properties of ${\rm{\hat{\Omega }}}$. For example, we show that the maximal value of ${\rm{\hat{\Omega }}}$ must be random, the minimal value must be Turing complete, and that ${\rm{\hat{\Omega }}}\left( X \right) \oplus X{ \ge _T}\emptyset \prime$ for every X. We also obtain some machine-dependent results, including that for every $\varepsilon > 0$, there is a universal machine V such that ${{\rm{\hat{\Omega }}}_V}$ maps every real X having effective Hausdorff dimension greater than ε to a real of effective Hausdorff dimension 0 with the property that $X{ \le _{tt}}{{\rm{\hat{\Omega }}}_V}\left( X \right)$; and that there is a real X and a universal machine V such that ${{\rm{\Omega }}_V}\left( X \right)$ is rational.

From index sets to randomness in ∅n: random reals and possibly infinite computations part II

2009 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Verónica Becher ◽  
Serge Grigorieff
Keyword(s):  
Large Class ◽  
Turing Machine ◽  
Index Sets ◽  
Random Reals

AbstractWe obtain a large class of significant examples of n-random reals (i.e., Martin-Löf random in oracle ∅(n−1)) à la Chaitin. Any such real is defined as the probability that a universal monotone Turing machine performing possibly infinite computations on infinite (resp. finite large enough, resp. finite self-delimited) inputs produces an output in a given set . In particular, we develop methods to transfer many-one completeness results of index sets to n-randomness of associated probabilities.

Perfect sets of random reals

1993 ◽  
Vol 83 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 153-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg Brendle ◽  
Haim Judah
Keyword(s):  
Random Reals

scholarly journals Random reals, the rainbow Ramsey theorem, and arithmetic conservation

2013 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 195-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris J. Conidis ◽  
Theodore A. Slaman
Keyword(s):  
Ramsey Theorem ◽  
First Order ◽  
Base Theory ◽  
Random Reals

AbstractWe investigate the question “To what extent can random reals be used as a tool to establish number theoretic facts?” Let 2-RAN be the principle that for every real X there is a real R which is 2-random relative to X. In Section 2, we observe that the arguments of Csima and Mileti [3] can be implemented in the base theory RCA0 and so RCA0 + 2-RAN implies the Rainbow Ramsey Theorem. In Section 3, we show that the Rainbow Ramsey Theorem is not conservative over RCA0 for arithmetic sentences. Thus, from the Csima–Mileti fact that the existence of random reals has infinitary-combinatorial consequences we can conclude that 2-RAN has non-trivial arithmetic consequences. In Section 4, we show that 2-RAN is conservative over RCA0 + BΣ2 for -sentences. Thus, the set of first-order consequences of 2-RAN is strictly stronger than P− + IΣ1 and no stronger than P− + BΣ2.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document