scholarly journals On nonformal simply-connected symplectic manifolds

2000 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. K. Babenko ◽  
I. A. Taîmanov
Keyword(s):  
Symplectic Manifolds ◽  
Simply Connected

scholarly journals Affine varieties, singularities and the growth rate of wrapped Floer cohomology

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (03) ◽  
pp. 493-530
Author(s):  
Mark McLean
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Cotangent Bundle ◽  
Betti Numbers ◽  
Symplectic Manifolds ◽  
Isolated Singularity ◽  
Contact Manifolds ◽  
Floer Cohomology ◽  
Complex Singularities ◽  
Smooth Affine ◽  
Simply Connected

In this paper, we give partial answers to the following questions: Which contact manifolds are contactomorphic to links of isolated complex singularities? Which symplectic manifolds are symplectomorphic to smooth affine varieties? The invariant that we will use to distinguish such manifolds is called the growth rate of wrapped Floer cohomology. Using this invariant we show that if [Formula: see text] is a simply connected manifold whose unit cotangent bundle is contactomorphic to the link of an isolated singularity or whose cotangent bundle is symplectomorphic to a smooth affine variety then M must be rationally elliptic and so it must have certain bounds on its Betti numbers.

scholarly journals On the formality and strong Lefschetz property of symplectic manifolds – Erratum

2009 ◽  
Vol 147 (1) ◽  
pp. 255-255
Author(s):  
Taek Kyu Hwang ◽  
Jin Hong Kim
Keyword(s):  
Fundamental Group ◽  
Symplectic Manifold ◽  
Symplectic Manifolds ◽  
Finite Covering ◽  
Massey Product ◽  
Lefschetz Property ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Simply Connected ◽  
Open Question ◽  
Strong Lefschetz Property

Professor Vicente Muñoz kindly informed us that there is an inaccuracy in Lemma 3.5 of [1]. The correct statement of Lemma 3.5 is now that the fundamental group π1(X′) of the manifold X′ is Z, since the monodromy coming from φ8 does not imply that g4 = g4−1. Therefore, what we have actually constructed in Section 3 of [1] is a closed non-formal 8-dimensional symplectic manifold with π1 = Z whose triple Massey product is non-zero, so that the simply-connectedness in Theorem 1.1 should be dropped. As far as we know, the existence of a simply connected closed non-formal 8-dimensional symplectic manifold whose triple Massey product is non-zero still remains an open question. All other main results, especially Theorem 1.2 and Corollary 1.3, in [1] are not affected by this mistake. Furthermore, the stability of the non-formality under a finite covering as in Subsection 3.3 holds in general. We want to thank Professor Muñoz for his careful reading.

scholarly journals Formality and the Lefschetz property in symplectic and cosymplectic geometry

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Bazzoni ◽  
Marisa Fernández ◽  
Vicente Muñoz
Keyword(s):  
Betti Numbers ◽  
Symplectic Manifolds ◽  
Topological Properties ◽  
Cosymplectic Manifolds ◽  
Connected Case ◽  
Lefschetz Property ◽  
Simply Connected

AbstractWe review topological properties of Kähler and symplectic manifolds, and of their odd-dimensional counterparts, coKähler and cosymplectic manifolds. We focus on formality, Lefschetz property and parity of Betti numbers, also distinguishing the simply-connected case (in the Kähler/symplectic situation) and the b

On Lagrangian embeddings into the complex projective spaces

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (05) ◽  
pp. 1650044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toru Yoshiyasu
Keyword(s):  
Projective Line ◽  
Symplectic Manifolds ◽  
Product Formula ◽  
Complex Projective Plane ◽  
Lagrangian Immersion ◽  
Complex Projective Spaces ◽  
Sum Formula ◽  
Simply Connected ◽  
Lagrangian Embedding ◽  
Complex Projective

We prove that for any closed orientable connected [Formula: see text]-manifold [Formula: see text] and any Lagrangian immersion of the connected sum [Formula: see text] either into the complex projective [Formula: see text]-space [Formula: see text] or into the product [Formula: see text] of the complex projective line and the complex projective plane, there exists a Lagrangian embedding which is homotopic to the initial Lagrangian immersion. To prove this, we show that Eliashberg–Murphy’s [Formula: see text]-principle for Lagrangian embeddings with a concave Legendrian boundary and Ekholm–Eliashberg–Murphy–Smith’s [Formula: see text]-principle for self-transverse Lagrangian immersions with the minimal or near-minimal number of double points hold for six-dimensional simply connected compact symplectic manifolds.

scholarly journals On the Definition of Irreducible Holomorphic Symplectic Manifolds and Their Singular Analogs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Schwald
Keyword(s):  
Symplectic Manifolds ◽  
Complex Tori ◽  
Finite Quotients ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Simply Connected

Abstract In the definition of irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifolds the condition of being simply connected can be replaced by vanishing irregularity. We discuss holomorphic symplectic, finite quotients of complex tori with ${\operatorname{h}}^0(X,\,\Omega ^{[2]}_X)=1$ and their Lagrangian fibrations. Neither $X$ nor the base can be smooth unless $X$ is a $2$-torus.

scholarly journals The Geography of Simply-Connected Symplectic Manifolds

2003 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mi Sung Cho ◽  
Yong Seung Cho
Keyword(s):  
Symplectic Manifolds ◽  
Simply Connected

On the formality and strong Lefschetz property of symplectic manifolds

2008 ◽  
Vol 145 (2) ◽  
pp. 363-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
TAEK GYU HWANG ◽  
JIN HONG KIM
Keyword(s):  
Symplectic Manifold ◽  
Explicit Construction ◽  
Symplectic Manifolds ◽  
Kähler Manifolds ◽  
Kahler Manifolds ◽  
Fixed Point Set ◽  
Lefschetz Property ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Simply Connected ◽  
Strong Lefschetz Property

AbstractThe main aim of this paper is to give some non-trivial results that exhibit the difference and similarity between Kähler and symplectic manifolds. To be precise, it is known that simply connected symplectic manifolds of dimension greater than 8, in general, do not satisfy the formality satisfied by all Kähler manifolds. In this paper we show that such non-formality of simply connected symplectic manifolds occurs even in dimension 8. We do this by some complicated but explicit construction of a simply connected non-formal symplectic manifold of dimension 8. In this construction we essentially use a variation of the construction of a simply connected symplectic manifold by Gompf. As a consequence, we can give infinitely many simply connected non-formal symplectic manifolds of any even dimension no less than 8.Secondly, we show that every compact symplectic manifold admitting a semi-free Hamiltonian circle action with only isolated fixed points must satisfy the strong Lefschetz property satisfied by all Kähler manifolds. This result shows that the strong Lefschetz property for the symplectic manifold admitting Hamiltonian circle actions is closely related to their fixed point set, as expected.

Constructing symplectic manifolds

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dusa McDuff ◽  
Dietmar Salamon
Keyword(s):  
Final Section ◽  
Symplectic Manifolds ◽  
Homotopy Equivalence ◽  
Codimension Two ◽  
Open Manifolds ◽  
Connected Sums ◽  
Symplectic Forms ◽  
Ambient Manifold ◽  
Blowing Up ◽  
Four Manifolds

This chapter examines various ways to construct symplectic manifolds and submanifolds. It begins by studying blowing up and down in both the complex and the symplectic contexts. The next section is devoted to a discussion of fibre connected sums and describes Gompf’s construction of symplectic four-manifolds with arbitrary fundamental group. The chapter also contains an exposition of Gromov’s telescope construction, which shows that for open manifolds the h-principle rules and the inclusion of the space of symplectic forms into the space of nondegenerate 2-forms is a homotopy equivalence. The final section outlines Donaldson’s construction of codimension two symplectic submanifolds and explains the associated decompositions of the ambient manifold.

scholarly journals Some groups with T1 primitive ideal spaces

1985 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. L. Carey ◽  
W. Moran
Keyword(s):  
Normal Subgroup ◽  
Lie Groups ◽  
Lie Group ◽  
Locally Compact Group ◽  
Primitive Ideal ◽  
Ideal Space ◽  
Solvable Lie Groups ◽  
Locally Compact ◽  
Simply Connected ◽  
Connected Lie Group

AbstractLet G be a second countable locally compact group possessing a normal subgroup N with G/N abelian. We prove that if G/N is discrete then G has T1 primitive ideal space if and only if the G-quasiorbits in Prim N are closed. This condition on G-quasiorbits arose in Pukanzky's work on connected and simply connected solvable Lie groups where it is equivalent to the condition of Auslander and Moore that G be type R on N (-nilradical). Using an abstract version of Pukanzky's arguments due to Green and Pedersen we establish that if G is a connected and simply connected Lie group then Prim G is T1 whenever G-quasiorbits in [G, G] are closed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document