Separation of glycated hemoglobin A1C by high-performance liquid chromatography on a non-porous exchanger

1991 ◽  
Vol 31 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 505-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Nakatani ◽  
T. Kitamura ◽  
Y. Yamasaki ◽  
Y. Kato
1999 ◽  
Vol 123 (9) ◽  
pp. 763-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanh M. Khuu ◽  
C. Andrew Robinson ◽  
Kathy Goolsby ◽  
Robert W. Hardy ◽  
Robert J. Konrad

Abstract Introduction.—Measurement of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is used as an objective measure of long-term blood glucose control in diabetic patients. Recent improvements in automation combined with new recommendations for precision and accuracy have caused us to reevaluate our methods for measuring HbA1c. Objective.—We evaluated a newly automated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) instrument for measurement of HbA1c (Tosoh A1c 2.2 Plus Glycohemoglobin Analyzer, Tosoh Medics, Foster City, Calif) and compared the results obtained by HPLC to those obtained with an immunoassay (Hitachi 911, Boehringer Mannheim Corporation, Indianapolis, Ind). Results.—The Tosoh analyzer was found to be linear in a range of 5.3% to 17% and had a throughput of 20 samples per hour. HbA1c results for 102 patient samples by the 2 techniques showed good correlation, with a slope of 0.87 and an intercept at 1.27% ± 0.15%. Both the total and within-run coefficients of variation were consistently lower for the HPLC method compared with the immunoassay method. The HPLC method produces a chromatogram that shows the different hemoglobin fractions, allowing identification of abnormal hemoglobin variants. In heterozygous individuals, HbA1c measurements are made with no interference from the hemoglobin variant. In the case of homozygous or doubly heterozygous hemoglobin variants, the Tosoh HPLC identifies the hemoglobin variants as such and correctly does not report a HbA1c value in the presence of a markedly decreased amount of hemoglobin A. Conclusions.—The Tosoh HPLC provides adequate throughput and improved precision, and the method is traceable to the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial.


1992 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 789-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinogu HASEGAWA ◽  
Toshinori SAKA ◽  
Naoyuki TAKEMURA ◽  
Hidekazu KOYAMA ◽  
Shigekatsu MOTOYOSHI

1991 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinogu HASEGAWA ◽  
Toshinori SAKO ◽  
Naoyuki TAKEMURA ◽  
Hidekazu KOYAMA ◽  
Shigekatsu MOTOYOSHI

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 265-268
Author(s):  
Murat Can ◽  
Berrak Güven ◽  
Ayse Semra Demir Akca

Abstract Background The potential effect of increase in hemoglobin (Hb) A2 and HbF on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) measurements were investigated using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method compared with an immunoturbimetric assay. Methods Samples producing abnormal chromatograms during the measurement of routine HbA1c testing with HPLC were further analyzed to characterize abnormal Hb variants. Patients were divided into three groups that had only high HbF (group 1), only high HbA2 (group 2), and both high HbA2 and HbF (group 3). HbA1c values of patients were re-assayed using the immunoturbidimetric method (Advia, Siemens Healthcare, Germany). Results HbA1c levels were significantly higher in all groups measured by immunoassay than in HPLC. We found a positive correlation between HPLC and immunoturbidimetry in the group 2 and a slight correlation in the group 1. There was no correlation between the two methods in group 3. Conclusions HbA1c measurement by HPLC method interfering with elevated HbA2 and HbF, especially HbF, should be verified by an immunoturbidimetric method.


2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 1235-1237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mercedes Lorenzo-Medina ◽  
Silvia De-La-Iglesia ◽  
Paloma Ropero ◽  
Ruth Martin-Alfaro ◽  
Lucia Quintana-Hidalgo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document