A note on intransitive preferences over events and outcomes

1990 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-140
Author(s):  
Dennis J. Packard
Keyword(s):  
Intransitive Preferences

Learning the Personalized Intransitive Preferences of Images

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 4139-4153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Chen ◽  
Chaokun Wang ◽  
Jianmin Wang ◽  
Xiang Ying ◽  
Xuecheng Wang
Keyword(s):  
Intransitive Preferences

Modelling intransitive preferences: A random-effects approach

2006 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rung-Ching Tsai ◽  
Ulf Böckenholt
Keyword(s):  
Random Effects ◽  
Intransitive Preferences

A Money-Pump for Acyclic Intransitive Preferences

dialectica ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johan E. Gustafsson
Keyword(s):  
Money Pump ◽  
Intransitive Preferences

scholarly journals Individuals with ventromedial frontal damage have more unstable but still fundamentally transitive preferences

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Q. Yu ◽  
Jason Dana ◽  
Joseph W. Kable
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Maker ◽  
Decision Process ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Rational Decision ◽  
Rational Choices ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Intransitive Preferences ◽  
Rational Decisions

AbstractThough the ventromedial frontal lobes (VMF) are clearly important for decision-making, the precise causal role of the VMF in the decision process has still not yet fully been established. Previous studies have suggested that individuals with VMF damage violate a hallmark axiom of rational decisions by having intransitive preferences (i.e., preferring A to B, B to C, but C to A), as these individuals are more likely to make cyclical choices (i.e., choosing C over A after previously choosing A over B and B over C). However, these prior studies cannot properly distinguish between two possibilities regarding effects of VMF damage: are individuals with VMF damage prone to choosing irrationally, or are their preferences simply more variable? We had individuals with focal VMF damage, individuals with other frontal damage, and healthy controls make repeated choices across three categories – artwork, chocolate bar brands, and gambles. Using sophisticated tests of transitivity, we find that, without exception, individuals with VMF damage made rational decisions consistent with transitive preferences, even though they more frequently exhibit choice cycles due to a greater variability in their preferences across time. That is, the VMF is necessary for having strong and reliable preferences across time and context, but not for being a rational decision maker. We conclude that VMF damage affects the noisiness with which value is assessed, but not the consistency with which value is sought.Significance statementThe VMF is a part of the brain that is thought to be one of the most important for preference-based choice. Despite this, whether it is needed to make rational choices at all is unknown. Previous studies have not discriminated between different possibilities regarding the critical necessary role that the VMF plays in value-based choice. Our study shows that individuals with VMF damage still make rational decisions consistent with what they prefer, but their choices are more variable and less reliable. That is, the VMF is important for the noisiness with which value is assessed, but not the consistency with which value is sought. This result has widespread implications for rethinking the role of VMF in decision-making.

scholarly journals Commentary: “Neural signatures of intransitive preferences”

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Brown ◽  
Clintin P. Davis-Stober ◽  
Michel Regenwetter
Keyword(s):  
Intransitive Preferences ◽  
Neural Signatures

Parsimonious testing of transitive or intransitive preferences: Reply to Birnbaum (2011).

2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. 684-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Regenwetter ◽  
Jason Dana ◽  
Clintin P. Davis-Stober ◽  
Ying Guo
Keyword(s):  
Intransitive Preferences
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document