Adult/child play

1984 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-45
Author(s):  
Joanna Foster
Keyword(s):  
2003 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 264-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilda A. Morelli ◽  
Barbara Rogoff ◽  
Cathy Angelillo

Ethnographic literature indicates that in many cultural communities around the world, children have extensive opportunities to learn through observing and participating in their community’s work and other mature activities. We argue that in communities in which children are often segregated from adult work (as in middle-class European American communities), young children instead are often involved in specialised child-focused activities such as lessons, adult–child play (and scholastic play), and conversation with adults on child-related topics. We examine this argument with systematic time-sampled observations of the extent of 2- to 3-year-old children’s access to adult work compared to their involvement in specialised child-focused activities. Observations focused on 12 children in each of four communities: two middle-class European American communities (West Newton, Massachusetts and Sugarhouse, Utah), Efe foragers of the Democratic Republic of Congo, and indigenous Maya of San Pedro, Guatemala. West Newton and Sugarhouse children had less frequent access to work and were involved more often in specialised child-focused activities than Efe and San Pedro children. The results support the idea that the middle-class European American children’s frequent involvement in specialised child-focused activities may relate to their more limited opportunities to learn through observing work activities of their communities. It may be less necessary for the Efe and San Pedro children to be involved in specialised child-focused activities to prepare them for involvement in mature community practices, because they are already a regular part of them.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 272-283
Author(s):  
Johanna Olli ◽  
Sanna Salanterä ◽  
Liisa Karlsson ◽  
Tanja Vehkakoski

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 100497
Author(s):  
Cecilia Wallerstedt ◽  
Niklas Pramling ◽  
Pernilla Lagerlöf
Keyword(s):  

1984 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 26-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Sparling ◽  
Isabelle Lewis
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Lucy F. CLEMENS ◽  
Cornelia A. T. KEGEL

Abstract Researchers agree that early literacy activities, like book sharing and parent-child play, are important for stimulating language development. We hypothesize that book sharing is most powerful because it elicits more interactive talk in young children than other activities. Parents of 43 infants (9–18 months) made two daylong audio recordings using the LENA system. We compared a typical day, with spontaneous occurring activities, with an instructed day when caregivers were prompted to do book reading and toy play. Book sharing resulted in a combination of more parent talk, child talk, and interactions than other language activities. Research context did not influence outcomes: no differences were found in language use between the spontaneous and the instructed activities. Overall it seems clear that even with infants shared reading is a strong unique stimulator of language use from parent and child.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Coppens ◽  
David F. Lancy ◽  
Pablo Chavajay ◽  
Katie G. Silva-Chavez ◽  
Jean Briggs ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-153
Author(s):  
Raymond E. Petren ◽  
David T. Lardier ◽  
Jacqueline Bible ◽  
Autumn Bermea ◽  
Brad van Eeden-Moorefield

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document