ClassifyingC *-algebras via ordered, mod-p K-theory

1996 ◽  
Vol 305 (1) ◽  
pp. 601-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marius Dadarlat ◽  
Terry A. Loring
Keyword(s):  
K Theory ◽  
Topology ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 337-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
James C. Alexander
Keyword(s):  
K Theory ◽  

1967 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 631-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. R. F. Maunder

There comes a time in the development of a cohomology theory when a discussion of cohomology operations becomes necessary. In the case of complex K-theory, the subject of the present paper, such operations have of course already been investigated by Adams (see (2)), so that any further discussion might appear superfluous. Powerful as Adams's results are, however, the situation still leaves something to be desired: it is not known just what other operations can be defined in K-theory, and it is an inconvenience from the standpoint of stable homotopy theory that Adams's operations are not themselves stable.


1993 ◽  
Vol 114 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-221
Author(s):  
Takuji Kashiwabara

In this note we present a new proof of a theorem of McClure on K*(Ω∞Σ∞X, Z/p) [11], in the special case when X is a finite complex with K1(X; Z/p) = 0. Although our method does not work in the full generality covered by his work, our argument requires neither a geometric interpretation of complex k-theory nor all the delicate coherence properties of its multiplication. Since BP-theory is not likely to possess such coherence properties [9], the possibility of generalizing his approach to the case of higher Morava K-theory does not seem feasible. On the contrary, the main ingredient of our approach is the rank formula for the Morava K-theory of the Borel construction [5], which works for any K(n); thus our approach is better adapted to the potential generalization [8]. Throughout the paper we assume that p > 2 so that mod p K-theory possesses a commutative multiplication, and denote by K*(−) the mod p K-theory. Since it is simpler to state our results in terms of CX, the combinatorial model for QX, rather than QX itself, we shall do so. This is sufficient, as when X is connected CX is homotopy equivalent to QX, and when not, K*(QX) can be easily recovered from K*(CX) (see e.g. [11]).


Author(s):  
M. Rørdam ◽  
F. Larsen ◽  
N. Laustsen
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document