Relative vapor pressure differences of B11F3-B10F3

1965 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 877-881
Author(s):  
I. B. Amirkhanova ◽  
A. V. Borisov ◽  
I. G. Gverdtsiteli ◽  
A. T. Karamyan
Keyword(s):  
Vapor Pressure ◽  
Relative Vapor Pressure

Relative vapor pressure via FTIR

1990 ◽  
Vol 139 (2) ◽  
pp. 593-594 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.L Rhykerd ◽  
J.H Cushman ◽  
P.F Low
Keyword(s):  
Vapor Pressure ◽  
Relative Vapor Pressure

scholarly journals Low Pressure Hysteresis in Materials with Narrow Slit Pores

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Schiller ◽  
Mirco Wahab ◽  
Thomas Bier ◽  
Hans-Jörg Mögel
Keyword(s):  
Vapor Pressure ◽  
Hysteresis Loops ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Macroscopic Model ◽  
Hardened Cement ◽  
Narrow Slit ◽  
Extended Model ◽  
Interaction Range ◽  
Relative Vapor Pressure ◽  
Slit Pores

Humidity-dependent closing and reopening slit pores can produce hysteresis loops in sorption diagrams even at low relative vapor pressure. Pore closing is supported by adhesion of the slit wall surfaces. In a macroscopic model for sorption hysteresis in narrow slits, the adhesion energy jumps by a finite value when touching slit walls are separated from each other. We consider a more realistic adhesion model by introducing a smoothly-varying adhesion force, which depends on the distance between the slit walls. The range of the attraction between the slit walls is found to have a pronounced influence on the shape of hysteresis loops at low vapor pressure. A large interaction range avoids an extraordinarily small relative vapor pressure necessary for pore closing, which is a precondition for low pressure hysteresis. Our extended model allows us to describe a discontinuity, which can appear in the desorption branch of swelling/shrinkage diagrams for hardened cement paste.

Effect of relative vapor pressure on separation of nanoscale contact in atomic force microscope

2010 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 114309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doo-In Kim ◽  
Young-Keun Jeong ◽  
Myung-Chang Kang ◽  
Hyo-Sok Ahn ◽  
Kwang Ho Kim
Keyword(s):  
Vapor Pressure ◽  
Atomic Force Microscope ◽  
Relative Vapor Pressure ◽  
Atomic Force

scholarly journals Experimental Study of Adsorption Equilibrium of Water on Zeolite and Adsorption Heat Storage under Low Relative Vapor Pressure.

1998 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
MICHITO KANAMORI ◽  
MASAYOSHI HIRAMATSU ◽  
TAKAYUKI SHIBATA ◽  
FUJIO WATANABE ◽  
HITOKI MATSUDA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Vapor Pressure ◽  
Heat Storage ◽  
Adsorption Equilibrium ◽  
Adsorption Heat ◽  
Relative Vapor Pressure

The Swelling of Rubber

1929 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 591-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Stamberger ◽  
C. M. Blow
Keyword(s):  
Vapor Pressure ◽  
Viscous Liquid ◽  
Carbon Disulfide ◽  
Surface Adsorption ◽  
Swelling Pressure ◽  
Mechanical Working ◽  
Relative Vapor Pressure ◽  
Different Origin

Abstract Some recent experiments on the diminution of the vapor pressure of solvents in rubber jellies, as well as measurements of swelling pressure, allow us to draw some conclusions as to the nature of the swelling phenomenon. It has been found that, at the same concentration of rubber, the vapor pressure of rubber jellies from rubber of different origin was the same, and the previous mechanical working (mastication) of rubber had also no effect on this value (cf. Stamberger, Rec. trav. chim., 47, 316 (1928)). After the mechanical working, however, it swells in an unlimited manner, and gives as a resulting product up to a concentration of 30 per cent a more or less viscous liquid. This behavior shows that the solvent is not bound by surface adsorption and that there is a great resemblance to the process of molecular disperse solution. The three solvents used for these determinations were carbon disulfide, chloroform, and benzene. The same relative vapor pressure diminution was found when the concentration has been calculated as grams of rubber in 1 gram-molecule of solvent.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document