The instructor self-evaluation form: Development and validation of an ipsative forced-choice measure of self-perceived faculty performance

1978 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 319-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique E. Batista ◽  
Dale C. Brandenburg
Keyword(s):  
Forced Choice ◽  
Faculty Performance ◽  
Evaluation Form ◽  
Self Evaluation ◽  
Form Development ◽  
Development And Validation

Task Evaluation Form: Development Procedures for Non-Equipment-Oriented Tasks.

1986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronnie Warm ◽  
J. T. Roth ◽  
J. A. Fitzpatrick
Keyword(s):  
Evaluation Form ◽  
Form Development

scholarly journals Late-onset stress symptomatology (LOSS) scale – short form: development and validation

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 952-960 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher B. Brady ◽  
Anica Pless Kaiser ◽  
Avron Spiro ◽  
Eve Davison ◽  
Daniel King ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Late Onset ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Form Development ◽  
Development And Validation

A Short Forced-Choice Evaluation Form for Salesmen

1953 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 393-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
ERWIN K. TAYLOR ◽  
DOROTHY E. SCHNEIDER ◽  
NANCY A. SYMONS
Keyword(s):  
Forced Choice ◽  
Evaluation Form

The Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format Character Measure: Testing the Thurstonian IRT Approach

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Vincent Ng ◽  
Philseok Lee ◽  
Moon-Ho Ringo Ho ◽  
Lauren Kuykendall ◽  
Stephen Stark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Forced Choice ◽  
Development And Validation

The self-evaluation form: is the SEF aiding school improvement?

2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 32-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Bubb ◽  
Peter Earley ◽  
Elpida Ahtaridou ◽  
Jeff Jones ◽  
Chris Taylor
Keyword(s):  
School Improvement ◽  
The Self ◽  
Evaluation Form ◽  
Self Evaluation

Development and validation of a care process self-evaluation tool

2007 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kris Vanhaecht ◽  
Karel De Witte ◽  
Roeland Depreitere ◽  
Ruben Van Zelm ◽  
Leentje De Bleser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Pathway ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Clinical Pathways ◽  
Care Process ◽  
Process Of Care ◽  
Evaluation Tool ◽  
Self Evaluation ◽  
Care Processes ◽  
Development And Validation ◽  
The Impact

Clinical pathways are used as a method of organizing care processes. Although they are used worldwide, the concept remains unclear, with little understanding of what exactly is being implemented. A recent systematic review revealed that, although a tool exists to score the instrumental qualities of clinical pathways, no tools are available to assess how the clinical pathway influences the process of care. These tools are needed for a better understanding of the impact of clinical pathways on the length of hospital stay and patient outcomes. In this study, a Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool (CPSET), based on the clinical pathway concept, for assessing the organization of the process of care has been developed and tested. Qualitative and quantitative methods, involving 885 professionals and patients, were used in the development and validation. The CPSET is a valid and reliable 29-item instrument for assessing how the process of care is organized. The CPSET has five subscales: patient-focused organization, coordination of care, communication with patients and family, cooperation with primary care and monitoring/follow-up of the care process. The CPSET can be used in the audit and accreditation of care processes and will help managers and clinicians to understand better how care processes are organized.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document