Non-linear ramsey resonance in the optical region

Ye. V. Baklanov; B. Ya. Dubetsky; V. P. Chebotayev

doi:10.1007/bf00903955

Effect of linear and non-linear mixing on hyper-spectral signatures of snow in the optical region (350–2500 nm)

Geocarto International ◽

10.1080/10106049.2018.1434683 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 34 (6) ◽

pp. 644-663 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Chander Shekhar ◽

Sunita Srivastava ◽

H. S. Negi ◽

Akshay Gore ◽

Snehmani

Keyword(s):

Spectral Signatures ◽

Hyper Spectral ◽

Non Linear ◽

Optical Region

Download Full-text

B. The Non-Linear Calculations for Pulsating Stars

Symposium - International Astronomical Union ◽

10.1017/s0074180900019008 ◽

1967 ◽

Vol 28 ◽

pp. 105-176

Author(s):

Robert F. Christy

Keyword(s):

Major Part ◽

Afternoon Session ◽

Discussion Session ◽

Pulsating Stars ◽

Fourth Symposium ◽

Non Linear ◽

Considerable Discussion ◽

Informal Approach ◽

Preceding Session

(Ed. note: The custom in these Symposia has been to have a summary-introductory presentation which lasts about 1 to 1.5 hours, during which discussion from the floor is minor and usually directed at technical clarification. The remainder of the session is then devoted to discussion of the whole subject, oriented around the summary-introduction. The preceding session, I-A, at Nice, followed this pattern. Christy suggested that we might experiment in his presentation with a much more informal approach, allowing considerable discussion of the points raised in the summary-introduction during its presentation, with perhaps the entire morning spent in this way, reserving the afternoon session for discussion only. At Varenna, in the Fourth Symposium, several of the summaryintroductory papers presented from the astronomical viewpoint had been so full of concepts unfamiliar to a number of the aerodynamicists-physicists present, that a major part of the following discussion session had been devoted to simply clarifying concepts and then repeating a considerable amount of what had been summarized. So, always looking for alternatives which help to increase the understanding between the different disciplines by introducing clarification of concept as expeditiously as possible, we tried Christy's suggestion. Thus you will find the pattern of the following different from that in session I-A. I am much indebted to Christy for extensive collaboration in editing the resulting combined presentation and discussion. As always, however, I have taken upon myself the responsibility for the final editing, and so all shortcomings are on my head.)

Download Full-text

Near-field scanning optical microscopy

Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America ◽

10.1017/s0424820100144644 ◽

1986 ◽

Vol 44 ◽

pp. 642-643

Author(s):

E. Betzig ◽

A. Harootunian ◽

M. Isaacson ◽

A. Lewis

Keyword(s):

Near Field ◽

Optical Microscope ◽

Visible Radiation ◽

Field Methods ◽

Optical Elements ◽

Optical Region ◽

Order Of Magnitude ◽

Nondestructive Imaging ◽

Scanning Optical Microscopy ◽

Near Field Scanning

In general, conventional methods of optical imaging are limited in spatial resolution by either the wavelength of the radiation used or by the aberrations of the optical elements. This is true whether one uses a scanning probe or a fixed beam method. The reason for the wavelength limit of resolution is due to the far field methods of producing or detecting the radiation. If one resorts to restricting our probes to the near field optical region, then the possibility exists of obtaining spatial resolutions more than an order of magnitude smaller than the optical wavelength of the radiation used. In this paper, we will describe the principles underlying such "near field" imaging and present some preliminary results from a near field scanning optical microscope (NS0M) that uses visible radiation and is capable of resolutions comparable to an SEM. The advantage of such a technique is the possibility of completely nondestructive imaging in air at spatial resolutions of about 50nm.

Download Full-text