Experimental investigation of a turbulent jet in turbulent cross flow

1982 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 866-868
Author(s):  
L. N. Voitovich
Author(s):  
Amro Elhelaly ◽  
Marwan Hassan ◽  
Atef Mohany ◽  
Soha Moussa

The integrity of tube bundles is very important especially when dealing with high-risk applications such as nuclear steam generators. A major issue to system integrity is the flow-induced vibration (FIV). FIV is manifested through several mechanisms including the most severe mechanism; fluidelastic instability (FEI). Tube vibration can be constrained by using tube supports. However, clearances between the tube and their support are required to allow for thermal expansion and for other manufacturing considerations. The clearance between tubes may allow frequent impact and friction between tube and support. This in turn may cause fatigue and wear at support and potential for catastrophic tube failure. This study aims to investigate the dynamics of loosely supported tube array subjected to cross-flow. The work is performed experimentally in an open-loop wind tunnel to address this issue. A loosely-supported single flexible tube in both triangle and square arrays subjected to cross-flow with a pitch-to-diameter ratio of 1.5 and 1.733, respectively were considered. The effect of the flow approach angle, as well as the support clearance on the tube response, are investigated. In addition, the parameters that affect tube wear such as impact force level are presented.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-Adrien Opinel ◽  
Narakorn Srinil

Abstract This paper presents the experimental investigation of vortex-induced vibrations (VIV) of a flexibly mounted circular cylinder in combined current and wave flows. The same experimental setup has previously been used in our previous study (OMAE2020-18161) on VIV in regular waves. The system comprises a pendulum-type vertical cylinder mounted on two-dimensional springs with equal stiffness in in-line and cross-flow directions. The mass ratio of the system is close to 3, the aspect ratio of the tested cylinder based on its submerged length is close to 27, and the damping in still water is around 3.4%. Three current velocities are considered in this study, namely 0.21 m/s, 0.29 m/s and 0.37 m/s, in combination with the generated regular waves. The cylinder motion is recorded using targets and two Qualisys cameras, and the water elevation is measured utilizing a wave probe. The covered ranges of Keulegan-Carpenter number KC are [9.6–35.4], [12.8–40.9] and [16.3–47.8], and the corresponding ranges of reduced velocity Vr are [8–16.3], [10.6–18.4] and [14–20.5] for the cases with current velocity of 0.21 m/s, 0.29 m/s and 0.37 m/s, respectively. The cylinder response amplitudes, trajectories and vibration frequencies are extracted from the recorded motion signals. In all cases the cylinder oscillates primarily at the flow frequency in the in-line direction, and the in-line VIV component additionally appears for the intermediate (0.29 m/s) and high (0.37 m/s) current velocities. The cross-flow oscillation frequency is principally at two or three times the flow frequency in the low current case, similar to what is observed in pure regular waves. For higher current velocities, the cross-flow frequency tends to lock-in with the system natural frequency, as in the steady flow case. The inline and cross-flow cylinder response amplitudes of the combined current and regular wave flow cases are eventually compared with the amplitudes from the pure current and pure regular wave flow cases.


2021 ◽  
Vol 409 ◽  
pp. 158-178
Author(s):  
Abdelkader Feddal ◽  
Abbes Azzi ◽  
Ahmed Zineddine Dellil

This paper deals with studying numerically two circular turbulent jets impinging on a flat surface with a low velocity cross flow by using ANSYS CFX 16.2, with the aim of proving the effect ofReynolds number on the flow demeanor in a vertical circular free turbulent jet with cross flow. Five turbulence models of the RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes) approach were tested and the k -ω SST model was chosen to validate CFD results with the experimental data. Average velocity profiles, velocity and turbulent kinetic energy contours and streamlines are presented for four case configurations. In the first three cases, the following parameters have been varied: Reynolds number at the level of the two jets ( ), wind velocity at the level of the cross-flow ( ), and the distance between the two jets (S = 45mm, 90mm and 135mm). In the last case, a new configuration of the phenomenon not yet studied so far was treated, where horizontal cross-flows were introduced from both sides in order to simulate gusts of wind disrupting a VSTOL aircraft which tries to operate close to the ground. This case was carried out for Reynolds number based on the crossflow of 4 104, 10 104 and 20 104 .The numerical results obtained show that the deflection of the jets is minimal when the Reynolds number at the level of the jets is greater than that of the cross-flow. The increase of Reynolds number at the level of the cross-flow reveals a significant deviation of the two jets with an intensity which always remains less for the second jet. As for the space parameter between the two jets, it turns out that the fact of further spacing the two jets makes the first jet even more vulnerable and leads to a greater deflection. Finally, the simulation of the wind gusts from the front and the back caused a zone of turbulence which resulted from a form of "interlacing" of the two jets under the effect of the transverse current imposed by the two sides.


1969 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 1057-1059
Author(s):  
Bruce D. Pratte ◽  
W. Douglas Baines
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document