The development of the raw material basis of the vitreous silica and optical glass industry

1973 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 291-293
Author(s):  
I. I. Mirochnikov ◽  
V. P. Kovalenko ◽  
K. R'. Abakov
2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-56
Author(s):  
Thomas Alkemeyer

Two forms or rather perspectives of observations appear alongside practice theories: The first perspective can be called the „theatre perspective“: practice here is observed as a regular, spatiotemporally ordered, socially structured, and therefore recognizable historical form of „practical doings and sayings“, in which participants are understood as mere carriers of practices and their bodies as the raw material for processes of formation. In the other perspective, understood as the perspective of the participants themselves, practices come into view as ongoing, conflictual, and contingent accomplishments, in which participants occur as intelligently collaborating contributors with so called „lived bodies“. These bodies are affectable, sites of experience, and media of a sensitivity that allow an embodied self to orientate itself (with)in a practice. This paper proposes a methodological mediation of both perspectives by taking into account both a sociological analysis of discipline, formation, or adjustment, and the reflexive sensing in action, which can be modeled phenomenologically. Thus, a „lived-body-in-accomplishment“ comes into view that serves the material basis of subjectivation procceses, i. e. the (self-)formation of a constitutionally conditioned (political) agency.


2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Piñero ◽  
Martin Bruckner ◽  
Hanspeter Wieland ◽  
Eva Pongrácz ◽  
Stefan Giljum

A new method of obtaining refractive index was described in 1902. Instead of depending on the accuracy of arbitrary measurements of refracting angle or the accuracy of construction of a prism, this method was based on the mean value of the three angles of a triangle. The description of this method was accompanied by a Table of the principal refractive indices of quartz, calcite, and fluorite, obtained in this manner, and was followed later by similar Tables of the refractive indices of vitreous silica, water, and optical glass, and in February, 1915, these were in turn followed by a Table of the refraction temperature coefficients of optical glass. Since the error due to the method itself amounted to less than unity in the seventh figure, there was promise of great accuracy. But, nevertheless, with every care, and in spite of the correction for temperature, errors even exceeding unity in the fifth decimal place were frequently manifest, requiring repeated and tedious observation to eliminate. Hence suspicion fell on the barometer. But it was pointed out by the late Prof. Sylvanus Thompson, F. R. S., and afterwards by Sir Arthur Schuster, who indicated the lines to be worked on, that the modulus of rigidity of glass precluded its being sensibly affected by atmospheric pressure, and that, therefore, any such effect must be due to the refraction of air alone.


Nature ◽  
1921 ◽  
Vol 106 (2673) ◽  
pp. 679-679
Keyword(s):  

1961 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 113-115
Author(s):  
E. Yu. Lev ◽  
S. M. Shneerov

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document