One mind or many ? A note on the everett interpretation of quantum theory

Synthese ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Euan J. Squires
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Theory ◽  
Everett Interpretation ◽  
Interpretation Of Quantum Theory

Operators and meaning of wave function

2016 ◽  
pp. 4039-4042
Author(s):  
Viliam Malcher
Keyword(s):  
Wave Function ◽  
Quantum Theory ◽  
State Vector ◽  
The State ◽  
Physical Significance ◽  
Central Problem ◽  
Quantum Mechanical ◽  
Mechanical Description ◽  
Quantum Mechanical Description ◽  
Interpretation Of Quantum Theory

The interpretation problems of quantum theory are considered. In the formalism of quantum theory the possible states of a system are described by a state vector. The state vector, which will be represented as |ψ> in Dirac notation, is the most general form of the quantum mechanical description. The central problem of the interpretation of quantum theory is to explain the physical significance of the |ψ>. In this paper we have shown that one of the best way to make of interpretation of wave function is to take the wave function as an operator.

scholarly journals Is a time symmetric interpretation of quantum theory possible without retrocausality?

2017 ◽  
Vol 473 (2202) ◽  
pp. 20160607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Leifer ◽  
Matthew F. Pusey
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Theory ◽  
Quantum State ◽  
General Framework ◽  
Bell Inequalities ◽  
Time Symmetry ◽  
Causality Criterion ◽  
The Status ◽  
Interpretation Of Quantum Theory ◽  
Huw Price ◽  
New Interpretation

Huw Price has proposed an argument that suggests a time symmetric ontology for quantum theory must necessarily be retrocausal, i.e. it must involve influences that travel backwards in time. One of Price's assumptions is that the quantum state is a state of reality. However, one of the reasons for exploring retrocausality is that it offers the potential for evading the consequences of no-go theorems, including recent proofs of the reality of the quantum state. Here, we show that this assumption can be replaced by a different assumption, called λ -mediation, that plausibly holds independently of the status of the quantum state. We also reformulate the other assumptions behind the argument to place them in a more general framework and pin down the notion of time symmetry involved more precisely. We show that our assumptions imply a timelike analogue of Bell's local causality criterion and, in doing so, give a new interpretation of timelike violations of Bell inequalities. Namely, they show the impossibility of a (non-retrocausal) time symmetric ontology.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document