Compatibility of ferritic and duplex stainless steels as implant materials: in vitro corrosion performance

1993 ◽  
Vol 28 (22) ◽  
pp. 6081-6086 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sivakumar ◽  
U. Kamachi Mudali ◽  
S. Rajeswari
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steels ◽  
Duplex Stainless Steels ◽  
Corrosion Performance ◽  
Implant Materials

Corrosion Performance of Girth-Weld Joints of Duplex Stainless Steels

CORROSION ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 45 (9) ◽  
pp. 764-770 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Tamaki ◽  
K. Yasuda ◽  
M. Kimura
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steels ◽  
Duplex Stainless Steels ◽  
Corrosion Performance ◽  
Weld Joints

BRILLIANT 2101 T-1 AP

Alloy Digest ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Tensile Properties ◽  
Stainless Steels ◽  
Duplex Stainless Steels ◽  
Good Balance ◽  
Steel Wires

Abstract Stoody AP stainless steel wires are all-position wires. The nickel in this product will achieve a good balance of austenite and ferrite in lean duplex stainless steels. This datasheet provides information on composition and tensile properties as well as fracture toughness. It also includes information on forming and joining. Filing Code: SS-1118. Producer or source: Stoody Company.

Detecting Critical Crevice Temperature for Duplex Stainless Steels in Chloride Solutions

CORROSION ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 025004-1-025004-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Han ◽  
Y. Jiang ◽  
B. Deng ◽  
L. Zhang ◽  
J. Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steels ◽  
Crevice Corrosion ◽  
Electrochemical Method ◽  
Duplex Stainless Steels ◽  
Good Reproducibility ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Initiation Step ◽  
Critical Pitting Temperature ◽  
Preferential Dissolution ◽  
Scanning Electron

Abstract A simple and rapid electrochemical method for the evaluation of crevice corrosion in duplex stainless steels (DSS) is described. Three types of DSS—namely, UNS S32101, UNS S31803, and UNS S32750—were tested in 1 mol/L sodium chloride (NaCl) solutions. Results showed good reproducibility with a typical standard deviation of below 3°C. The critical pitting temperature (CPT) for the same specimens was also investigated in 1 mol/L NaCl solutions. An approximately 20°C decrease from CPT to critical crevice temperature (CCT) was observed and subsequently explained. Then, the morphologies of crevice corrosion were studied using scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) method. The SEM/EDS study revealed that the ferrite phase was the site where preferential dissolution took place at the initiation step of crevice corrosion, which was in accordance with the prediction by calculating the critical crevice index. Moreover, repassivation was detected with the development of crevice corrosion. The reason was clarified by combining the results obtained with a successful diffusion model, and eventually the crevice corrosion progress was illustrated schematically.

Hot Cracking Susceptibility in Duplex Stainless Steel Welds

2018 ◽  
Vol 941 ◽  
pp. 679-685
Author(s):  
Kazuyoshi Saida ◽  
Tomo Ogura
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steels ◽  
Laser Beam Welding ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steels ◽  
Hot Cracking ◽  
Duplex Stainless Steels ◽  
Solidification Cracking ◽  
Solidification Mode ◽  
Gas Tungsten Arc ◽  
Varestraint Test ◽  
Super Duplex Stainless Steels

The hot cracking (solidification cracking) susceptibility in the weld metals of duplex stainless steels were quantitatively evaluated by Transverse-Varestraint test with gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW) and laser beam welding (LBW). Three kinds of duplex stainless steels (lean, standard and super duplex stainless steels) were used for evaluation. The solidification brittle temperature ranges (BTR) of duplex stainless steels were 58K, 60K and 76K for standard, lean and super duplex stainless steels, respectively, and were comparable to those of austenitic stainless steels with FA solidification mode. The BTRs in LBW were 10-15K lower than those in GTAW for any steels. In order to clarify the governing factors of solidification cracking in duplex stainless steels, the solidification segregation behaviours of alloying and impurity elements were numerically analysed during GTAW and LBW. Although the harmful elements to solidification cracking such as P, S and C were segregated in the residual liquid phase in any joints, the solidification segregation of P, S and C in LBW was inhibited compared with GTAW due to the rapid cooling rate in LBW. It followed that the decreased solidification cracking susceptibility of duplex stainless steels in LBW would be mainly attributed to the suppression of solidification segregation of P, S and C.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document