An extreme form of the hyperdynamic syndrome in septic shock

1984 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
J.D. Baumgartner ◽  
C. Vaney ◽  
C. Perret
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Extreme Form ◽  
Hyperdynamic Syndrome

Low-Dose Steroids Cut Mortality in Septic Shock

2006 ◽  
Vol 36 (19) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
BRUCE JANCIN
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Low Dose

Septic shock patient and ultrasound in the emergency room

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Algaba Montes ◽  
AÁ Oviedo García ◽  
M Patricio Bordomás
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Emergency Room ◽  
Septic Shock Patient

A Strategy for Analysing Multiple Risk Factors with Application to Cervical Pain Syndrome

1989 ◽  
Vol 28 (01) ◽  
pp. 14-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Dartigues ◽  
Ph. Peytour ◽  
E. Puymirat ◽  
P. Henry ◽  
M. Gagnon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Low Power ◽  
Head Trauma ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Psychological Status ◽  
Confounding Factors ◽  
Cervical Pain ◽  
Extreme Form ◽  
Explanatory Variables ◽  
Multiple Risk Factors

Abstract:When studying the possible effects of several factors in a given disease, two major problems arise: (1) confounding, and (2) multiplicity of tests. Frequently, in order to cope with the problem of confounding factors, models with multiple explanatory variables are used. However, the correlation structure of the variables may be such that the corresponding tests have low power: in its extreme form this situation is coined by the term “multicollinearity”. As the problem of multiplicity is still relevant in these models, the interpretation of results is, in most cases, very hazardous. We propose a strategy - based on a tree structure of the variables - which provides a guide to the interpretation and controls the risk of erroneously rejecting null hypotheses. The strategy was applied to a study of cervical pain syndrome involving 990 subjects and 17 variables. Age, sex, head trauma, posture at work and psychological status were all found to be important risk factors.

Combination of Antibiotic Treatment with the Thrombin Inhibitor Recombinant Hirudin for the Therapy of Experimental Klebsiella pneumoniae Sepsis

1994 ◽  
Vol 71 (06) ◽  
pp. 768-772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard Dickneite ◽  
Jörg Czech
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Klebsiella Pneumoniae ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Therapeutic Effect ◽  
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation ◽  
Post Infection ◽  
Thrombin Inhibitor ◽  
Bolus Administration ◽  
Bacterial Burden ◽  
Recombinant Hirudin

SummaryRats which were infected with the gramnegative pathogen Klebsiella pneumoniae develop disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), multi-organ failure (MOF) and finally die in a septic shock. We investigated the therapeutic effect of antibiotic (tobramycin) treatment combined with the infusion of the highly specific thrombin inhibitor rec. hirudin. Although administration of 2 mg/kg tobramycin alone leads to a decrease of the bacterial burden, DIC could not be prevented. Infusion of rec. hirudin (0.25 mg/kg x h) for 4 h (start of treatment 1 h post infection), in addition to a bolus administration of tobramycin, led to an amelioration of DIC parameters as fibrinogen, thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT) and platelets. Serum transaminase levels (GOT, GPT) as a marker of MOF were significantly improved by rec. hirudin, the T50 value increased from 17 h in the tobramycin group to 42 h in the tobramycin + rec. hirudin giuup, muilality rates were 90% or 60%, respectively. Combination of heparin (10011/kg x h) and tobramycin was not effective on survival.

Evidence for impaired 21-hydroxylase activity in patients with septic shock

2004 ◽  
Vol 112 (S 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
MWA Angstwurm ◽  
A Rashidi-Kia ◽  
M Bidlingmeier ◽  
J Schopohl ◽  
R Gaertner
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Hydroxylase Activity

Effect of fluid bolus triggers and their combination on fluid responsiveness in optimization phase of severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitation

MedPharmRes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 27-32
Author(s):  
Bien Le ◽  
Dai Huynh ◽  
Mai Tuan ◽  
Minh Phan ◽  
Thao Pham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Fluid Responsiveness ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Fluid Bolus ◽  
Low Blood Pressure ◽  
Low Central Venous Pressure ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

Objectives: to evaluate the fluid responsiveness according to fluid bolus triggers and their combination in severe sepsis and septic shock. Design: observational study. Patients and Methods: patients with severe sepsis and septic shock who already received fluid after rescue phase of resuscitation. Fluid bolus (FB) was prescribed upon perceived hypovolemic manifestations: low central venous pressure (CVP), low blood pressure, tachycardia, low urine output (UOP), hyperlactatemia. FB was performed by Ringer lactate 500 ml/30 min and responsiveness was defined by increasing in stroke volume (SV) ≥15%. Results: 84 patients were enrolled, among them 30 responded to FB (35.7%). Demographic and hemodynamic profile before fluid bolus were similar between responders and non-responders, except CVP was lower in responders (7.3 ± 3.4 mmHg vs 9.2 ± 3.6 mmHg) (p 0.018). Fluid response in low CVP, low blood pressure, tachycardia, low UOP, hyperlactatemia were 48.6%, 47.4%, 38.5%, 37.0%, 36.8% making the odd ratio (OR) of these triggers were 2.81 (1.09-7.27), 1.60 (0.54-4.78), 1.89 (0.58-6.18), 1.15 (0.41-3.27) and 1.27 (0.46-3.53) respectively. Although CVP < 8 mmHg had a higher response rate, the association was not consistent at lower cut-offs. The combination of these triggers appeared to raise fluid response but did not reach statistical significance: 26.7% (1 trigger), 31.0% (2 triggers), 35.7% (3 triggers), 55.6% (4 triggers), 100% (5 triggers). Conclusions: fluid responsiveness was low in optimization phase of resuscitation. No fluid bolus trigger was superior to the others in term of providing a higher responsiveness, their combination did not improve fluid responsiveness as well.

Difficulties in the treatment of septic shock in a patient with status epilepticus – a case report

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-64
Author(s):  
Urszula Zielińska-Borkowska ◽  
Aneta Słabuszewska-Joźwiak
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Status Epilepticus
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document