On the possibility of localizing in situ Mus musculus and Drosophila virilus satellite DNAs by Alu I and Eco RI restriction endonucleases

Genetica ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Mezzanotte ◽  
P. E. Manconi ◽  
L. Ferrucci
Keyword(s):  
Mus Musculus ◽  
Restriction Endonucleases ◽  
Satellite Dnas ◽  
Eco Ri

scholarly journals Isolation of a Pericentromeric Satellite DNA Family in Chnootriba argus (Henosepilachna argus) with an Unusual Short Repeat Unit (TTAAAA) for Beetles

Insects ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Mora ◽  
Jesús Vela ◽  
Areli Ruiz-Mena ◽  
Teresa Palomeque ◽  
Pedro Lorite
Keyword(s):  
Repetitive Dna ◽  
Satellite Dna ◽  
Repeat Unit ◽  
Pericentromeric Region ◽  
Fish Analysis ◽  
Agricultural Pests ◽  
Base Pairs ◽  
Satellite Dnas ◽  
Repeat Units

Ladybird beetles (Coccinellidae) are one of the largest groups of beetles. Among them, some species are of economic interest since they can act as a biological control for some agricultural pests whereas other species are phytophagous and can damage crops. Chnootriba argus (Coccinellidae, Epilachnini) has large heterochromatic pericentromeric blocks on all chromosomes, including both sexual chromosomes. Classical digestion of total genomic DNA using restriction endonucleases failed to find the satellite DNA located on these heterochromatic regions. Cloning of C0t-1 DNA resulted in the isolation of a repetitive DNA with a repeat unit of six base pairs, TTAAAA. The amount of TTAAAA repeat in the C. argus genome was about 20%. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis and digestion of chromosomes with the endonuclease Tru9I revealed that this repetitive DNA could be considered as the putative pericentromeric satellite DNA (satDNA) in this species. The presence of this satellite DNA was tested in other species of the tribe Epilachnini and it is also present in Epilachna paenulata. In both species, the TTAAAA repeat seems to be the main satellite DNA and it is located on the pericentromeric region on all chromosomes. The size of this satDNA, which has only six base pairs is unusual in Coleoptera satellite DNAs, where satDNAs usually have repeat units of a much larger size. Southern hybridization and FISH proved that this satDNA is conserved in some Epilachnini species but not in others. This result is in concordance with the controversial phylogenetic relationships among the genera of the tribe Epilachnini, where the limits between genera are unclear.

The molecular structure, chromosomal organization, and interspecies distribution of a family of tandemly repeated DNA sequences of Antirrhinum majus L.

Genome ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Schmidt ◽  
Jörg Kudla
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Satellite Dna ◽  
Antirrhinum Majus ◽  
Repeated Dna ◽  
Satellite Dnas ◽  
Repeated Dna Sequences ◽  
The North ◽  
Tandemly Repeated Dna

Monomers of a major family of tandemly repeated DNA sequences of Antirrhinum majus have been cloned and characterized. The repeats are 163–167 bp long, contain on average 60% A + T residues, and are organized in head-to-tail orientation. According to site-specific methylation differences two subsets of repeating units can be distinguished. Fluorescent in situ hybridization revealed that the repeats are localized at centromeric regions of six of the eight chromosome pairs of A. majus with substantial differences in array size. The monomeric unit shows no homologies to other plant satellite DNAs. The repeat exists in a similar copy number and conserved size in the genomes of six European species of the genus Antirrhinum. Tandemly repeated DNA sequences with homology to the cloned monomer were also found in the North American section Saerorhinum, indicating that this satellite DNA might be of ancient origin and was probably already present in the ancestral genome of both sections. Key words : Antirrhinum majus, satellite DNA, repetitive DNA, methylation, in situ hybridization.

In situ digestion of Drosophila virilis polytene chromosomes by AluI and HaeIII restriction endonucleases

Genome ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 630-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Mezzanotte ◽  
U. Bianchi ◽  
A. Marchi
Keyword(s):  
Base Composition ◽  
Polytene Chromosomes ◽  
Drosophila Virilis ◽  
Restriction Endonucleases ◽  
Histone Genes ◽  
Chromosomal Dna ◽  
5S Rna ◽  
5S Rna Genes ◽  
Rna Genes

Polytene chromosomes of Drosophila virilis were treated with AluI and HaeIII restriction endonucleases. Both enzymes were capable of extensively digesting chromosomal DNA, with the exception of some regions that contain repetitive DNAs. Moreover, a comparison was made between our data and the data already obtained with the same enzymes in D. melanogaster. On this basis, AluI digestion showed that the 5S RNA genes of D. virilis and D. melanogaster have different base composition, while digestion with HaeIII revealed resistance of the histone genes in D. virilis, contrary to what was previously found in D. melanogaster. Key words: restriction endonucleases, 5S RNA genes, histone genes, polytene chromosomes, Drosophila species.

A new banding pattern of human chromosomes by in situ nick translation using ECO RI and biotin-dUTP

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörn Bullerdiek ◽  
Jürgen Dittmer ◽  
Angelika Faehre ◽  
Sabine Bartnitzke ◽  
Volker Kasche ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Banding Pattern ◽  
Human Chromosomes ◽  
Nick Translation ◽  
In Situ Nick Translation ◽  
Eco Ri

In situ digestion of barley chromosomes with restriction endonucleases

Genome ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 793-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Kamisugi ◽  
Y. Ikeda ◽  
M. Ohno ◽  
M. Minezawa ◽  
K. Fukui
Keyword(s):  
Hordeum Vulgare ◽  
Restriction Endonuclease ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Band Pattern ◽  
Restriction Endonucleases ◽  
Chromosome Band ◽  
Buffer Solution ◽  
Hordeum Vulgare L

In situ digestion of barley chromosomes with restriction endonucleases was examined. All the treatments with five restriction endonucleases, MboII, RsaI, HaeIII, HinfI, and DraII, showed various band patterns on the barley chromosomes. Differences were observed in the band patterns produced with different restriction endonucleases. Uneven staining patterns, similar to the band patterns by the endonuclease treatments, also appeared when the chromosomes were treated with the buffer solution without the enzyme. The band patterns observed both with and without the endonucleases were classified into the four types and the frequency of each type among the different treatments was investigated. The change of the band types along with treatment time was accelerated by the addition of the restriction endonuclease. As a result, it was concluded that there existed chromosome band patterns that were specific to the endonuclease treatments and that the buffer solution also affected to the production of the bands on the chromosomes.Key words: Hordeum vulgare L., chromosome band pattern, in situ digestion, restriction endonuclease, restriction banding.

scholarly journals DNase I nick translation in situ on meiotic chromosomes of the mouse, Mus musculus

1988 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 629-634
Author(s):  
R. Raman ◽  
A.P. Singh ◽  
I. Nanda
Keyword(s):  
Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Mus Musculus ◽  
Meiotic Prophase ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Dnase I ◽  
Translation Method ◽  
Nick Translation ◽  
Meiotic Chromosomes

DNase-I-sensitive sites have been located on the meiotic chromosomes of the mouse, Mus musculus, by the in situ DNase I nick-translation method. We find that: (1) of all the cell types studied, pachytene nuclei are the most sensitive to DNase I; (2) in diplotene the nicks occur preferentially in the vicinity of chiasmata; (3) the sex chromosomes are also sensitive to the enzyme despite their transcriptional quiescence; and (4) in the sex bivalent the nicks are primarily observed in the putative region of recombination. We conclude that, in addition to discriminating between the transcriptionally active and inactive states of chromatin, DNase I identifies recombination-specific chromatin changes in meiotic prophase.

scholarly journals Genomic in situ hybridization in interspecific hybrids of scallops (Bivalvia, Pectinidae) and localization of the satellite DNA Cf303, and the vertebrate telomeric sequences (TTAGGG)n on chromosomes of scallop Chlamys farreri (Jones & Preston, 1904)

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-95
Author(s):  
Liping Hu ◽  
Liming Jiang ◽  
Ke Bi ◽  
Huan Liao ◽  
Zujing Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interspecific Hybrids ◽  
Distribution Patterns ◽  
Mitotic Chromosomes ◽  
Chromosomal Distribution ◽  
Satellite Dnas ◽  
Banding Patterns ◽  
Telomeric Sequences ◽  
Specific Distribution ◽  
Species Specific

Mitotic chromosome preparations of the interspecific hybrids Chlamysfarreri (Jones & Preston, 1904) × Patinopectenyessoensis (Jay, 1857), C.farreri × Argopectenirradinas (Lamarck, 1819) and C.farreri × Mimachlamysnobilis (Reeve, 1852) were used to compare two different scallop genomes in a single slide. Although genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) using genomic DNA from each scallop species as probe painted mitotic chromosomes of the interspecific hybrids, the painting results were not uniform; instead it showed species-specific distribution patterns of fluorescent signals among the chromosomes. The most prominent GISH-bands were mainly located at centromeric or telomeric regions of scallop chromosomes. In order to illustrate the sequence constitution of the GISH-bands, the satellite Cf303 sequences of C.farreri and the vertebrate telomeric (TTAGGG)n sequences were used to map mitotic chromosomes of C.farreri by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The results indicated that the GISH-banding pattern presented by the chromosomes of C.farreri is mainly due to the distribution of the satellite Cf303 DNA, therefore suggesting that the GISH-banding patterns found in the other three scallops could also be the result of the chromosomal distribution of other species-specific satellite DNAs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document