The Present State of Molecular Forces

2006 ◽  
pp. 65-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry W. Ninham
Keyword(s):  
Present State ◽  
Molecular Forces

Molecular Forces and Self Assembly

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry W. Ninham ◽  
Pierandrea Lo Nostro
Keyword(s):  
Self Assembly ◽  
Molecular Forces

The Present State of the Art

1984 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 344-346
Author(s):  
Peter A. Magaro
Keyword(s):  
Present State ◽  
State Of The Art

Present state and innovative issues for ironmaking

2005 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.-M. Steiler ◽  
F. Hanrot
Keyword(s):  
Present State

Competitive Capacity and Modernization of the Russian Economy

2004 ◽  
pp. 4-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Yasin ◽  
A. Yakovlev
Keyword(s):  
Present State ◽  
Transition Economy ◽  
Adaptive Model ◽  
Russian Economy

Having analyzed the present state of the Russian economy the authors come to the conclusion that the only reasonable goal of its modernization is achieving high competitive capacity of production. External and internal competitive capacity is analysed in detail basing on broad statistics as well as competitive capacity of institutions and their changes, the adaptive model of transition economy. According to the authors implementation of competitive capacity policy as a national idea should take into account long-term perspective.

Criminal Forfeiture under Kenya's Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Act: Nature and Challenges

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 657-676
Author(s):  
Constance Gikonyo
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Present State ◽  
Complex Nature ◽  
Fair Process ◽  
Proceeds Of Crime ◽  
State Of Affairs ◽  
Substantive Law

Criminal forfeiture is an asset confiscation mechanism used to seize benefits gained from an offence that one is convicted of. In Kenya, the Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Act provides the facilitating legislation. The present state of the regime's underutilisation prompts an examination of the substantive law and procedure provided in this statute. The analysis indicates that the provisions are technical in nature and the process is systematic. This ensures that a procedurally and substantively fair process is undertaken, in keeping with constitutional provisions. Nonetheless, identified challenges, including the complex nature of the provisions, translate to unclear interpretation and consequently ineffective implementation. This state of affairs is reversible through increased understanding of the criminal forfeiture provisions and their operation. This can potentially lead to an upsurge in its use and facilitate depriving offenders of criminal gains, removing the incentive for crime and reducing proceeds available to fund criminal activities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document