A Practical Peer-Performance-Aware DHT

2005 ◽  
pp. 193-200
Author(s):  
Yan Tang ◽  
Zhengguo Hu ◽  
Yang Zhang ◽  
Lin Zhang ◽  
Changquan Ai
Keyword(s):  
Peer Performance

scholarly journals Effect of Engaging Trainees by Assessing Peer Performance: A Randomised Controlled Trial Using Simulated Patient Scenarios

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Loumann Krogh ◽  
Charlotte Ringsted ◽  
Charles B. Kromann ◽  
Maria Birkvad Rasmussen ◽  
Tobias Todsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Global Rating ◽  
Training Performance ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Training Format ◽  
Peer Performance ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Introduction. The aim of this study was to explore the learning effect of engaging trainees by assessing peer performance during simulation-based training.Methods. Eighty-four final year medical students participated in the study. The intervention involved trainees assessing peer performance during training. Outcome measures were in-training performance and performance, both of which were measured two weeks after the course. Trainees’ performances were videotaped and assessed by two expert raters using a checklist that included a global rating. Trainees’ satisfaction with the training was also evaluated.Results. The intervention group obtained a significantly higher overall in-training performance score than the control group: mean checklist score 20.87 (SD 2.51) versus 19.14 (SD 2.65)P=0.003and mean global rating 3.25 SD (0.99) versus 2.95 (SD 1.09)P=0.014. Postcourse performance did not show any significant difference between the two groups. Trainees who assessed peer performance were more satisfied with the training than those who did not: mean 6.36 (SD 1.00) versus 5.74 (SD 1.33)P=0.025.Conclusion. Engaging trainees in the assessment of peer performance had an immediate effect on in-training performance, but not on the learning outcome measured two weeks later. Trainees had a positive attitude towards the training format.

Peer Performance Evaluation

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Carolina Saffie-Robertson ◽  
Stéphane Brutus
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Peer Performance

Physiciansʼ Perceptions of Psychological Safety and Peer Performance Feedback

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 250-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renée A. Scheepers ◽  
Myra van den Goor ◽  
Onyebuchi A. Arah ◽  
Maas Jan Heineman ◽  
Kiki M. J. M. H. Lombarts
Keyword(s):  
Performance Feedback ◽  
Psychological Safety ◽  
Peer Performance

Sexism and beautyism in women's evaluations of peer performance

Sex Roles ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 10 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 87-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas F. Cash ◽  
Claire A. Trimer
Keyword(s):  
Peer Performance
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document