Quantification of the Initial Lymphatic Network in Normal Human Forearm Skin Using Fluorescence Microlymphography and Stereological Methods

1997 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.W.B. Stanton ◽  
P. Kadoo ◽  
P.S. Mortimer ◽  
J.R. Levick
1990 ◽  
Vol 29 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 292-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. M. T. Carnochan ◽  
N. C. Abbot ◽  
J. S. Beck ◽  
V. A. Spence ◽  
P. B. James

1998 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 233
Author(s):  
Kyung Ywal Lee ◽  
Jun Ha Woo ◽  
Chun Wook Park ◽  
Cheol Heon Lee

1976 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 826-831 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Johnson ◽  
G. L. Brengelmann ◽  
L. B. Rowell

A three-part experiment was designed to examine interactions between local and reflex influences on forearm skin blood flow (SkBF). In part I locally increasing arm skin temperature (Tsk) to 42.5 degrees C was not associated with increases in underlying forearm muscle blood flow, esophageal temperature (Tes), or forearm blood flow in the contralateral cool arm. In part II whole-body Tsk was held at 38 or 40 degrees C and the surface temperature of one arm held at 38 or 42 degrees C for prolonged periods. SkBF in the heated arm rose rapidly with the elevation in body Tsk and arm Tsk continued to rise as Tes rose. SkBF in the arm kept at 32 degrees C paralleled rising Tes. In six studies, SkBF in the cool arm ultimately converged with SkBF in the heated arm. In eight other studies, heated arm SkBF maintained an offset above cool arm SkBF throughout the period of whole-body heating. In part III, local arm Tsk of 42.5 degrees C did not abolish skin vasoconstrictor response to lower body negative pressure. We conclude that local and reflex influences to skin interact so as to modify the degree but not the pattern of skin vasomotor response.


1993 ◽  
Vol 38 (S2) ◽  
pp. C31-C34 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Tafler ◽  
M. K. Herbert ◽  
R. F. Schmidt ◽  
K. H. Weis

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1481
Author(s):  
Mengfei Peng ◽  
Debabrata Biswas

The human forearm skin microbiome ecosystem contains rich and diverse microbes, which are influenced by environmental exposures. The microbial representatives can be exchanged between human and environment, specifically animals, by which they share certain or similar epidermal microbes. Livestock and poultry are the microbial sources that are associated with the transmission of community-based pathogenic infections. Here, in this study, we proposed investigating the environmental influences introduced by livestock/poultry operations on forearm skin microflora of on-site farm workers. A total of 30 human skin swab samples were collected from 20 animal workers in dairy or integrated farms and 10 healthy volunteer controls. The skin microbiome was 16S metagenomics that were sequenced with Illumina MiSeq system. For skin microbial community analysis, the abundance of major phyla and genera as well as alpha and beta diversities were compared across groups. We identified distinctive microbial compositional patterns on skin of workers in farm with different animal commodities. Workers in integrated farms containing various animals were associated with higher abundances of epidermal Proteobacteria, especially Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter, but lower Actinobacteria, especially Corynebacterium and Propionibacterium. For those workers with frequent dairy cattle operations, their Firmicutes in the forearm skin microbiota were enriched. Furthermore, farm animal operations also reduced Staphylococcus and Streptococcus, as well as modulated the microbial biodiversity in farm workers’ skin microbiome. The alterations of forearm skin microflora in farm workers, influenced by their frequent farm animal operations, may increase their risk in skin infections with unusual pathogens and epidermal diseases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document