scholarly journals Gene Expression and Chromatin Organization during Mouse Oocyte Growth

1999 ◽  
Vol 207 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Christians ◽  
Michele Boiani ◽  
Silvia Garagna ◽  
Cécile Dessy ◽  
Carlo Alberto Redi ◽  
...  
1995 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 479-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurizio Zuccotti ◽  
Anna Piccinelli ◽  
Paolo Giorgi Rossi ◽  
Silvia Garagna ◽  
Carlo Alberto Redi

2006 ◽  
Vol 73 (6) ◽  
pp. 685-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuela Monti ◽  
Silvia Garagna ◽  
CarloAlberto Redi ◽  
Maurizio Zuccotti

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiko Sakashita ◽  
Yosuke Iseki ◽  
Mei Nakajima ◽  
Takuya Wakai ◽  
Hisato Kobayashi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 5578
Author(s):  
Cedric R. Clapier

The establishment and maintenance of genome packaging into chromatin contribute to define specific cellular identity and function. Dynamic regulation of chromatin organization and nucleosome positioning are critical to all DNA transactions—in particular, the regulation of gene expression—and involve the cooperative action of sequence-specific DNA-binding factors, histone modifying enzymes, and remodelers. Remodelers are molecular machines that generate various chromatin landscapes, adjust nucleosome positioning, and alter DNA accessibility by using ATP binding and hydrolysis to perform DNA translocation, which is highly regulated through sophisticated structural and functional conversations with nucleosomes. In this review, I first present the functional and structural diversity of remodelers, while emphasizing the basic mechanism of DNA translocation, the common regulatory aspects, and the hand-in-hand progressive increase in complexity of the regulatory conversations between remodelers and nucleosomes that accompanies the increase in challenges of remodeling processes. Next, I examine how, through nucleosome positioning, remodelers guide the regulation of gene expression. Finally, I explore various aspects of how alterations/mutations in remodelers introduce dissonance into the conversations between remodelers and nucleosomes, modify chromatin organization, and contribute to oncogenesis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilona E. Grabowicz ◽  
Bartek Wilczyński ◽  
Bożena Kamińska ◽  
Adria-Jaume Roura ◽  
Bartosz Wojtaś ◽  
...  

AbstractGenome-wide studies have uncovered specific genetic alterations, transcriptomic patterns and epigenetic profiles associated with different glioma types. We have recently created a unique atlas encompassing genome-wide profiles of open chromatin, histone H3K27ac and H3Kme3 modifications, DNA methylation and transcriptomes of 33 glioma samples of different grades. Here, we intersected genome-wide atlas data with topologically associating domains (TADs) and demonstrated that the chromatin organization and epigenetic landscape of enhancers have a strong impact on genes differentially expressed in WHO low grade versus high grade gliomas. We identified TADs enriched in glioma grade-specific genes and/or epigenetic marks. We found the set of transcription factors, including REST, E2F1 and NFKB1, that are most likely to regulate gene expression in multiple TADs, containing specific glioma-related genes. Moreover, many genes associated with the cell–matrix adhesion Gene Ontology group, in particular 14 PROTOCADHERINs, were found to be regulated by long-range contacts with enhancers. Presented results demonstrate the existence of epigenetic differences associated with chromatin organization driving differential gene expression in gliomas of different malignancy.


Author(s):  
Chanseob Shim ◽  
Sang Gu Lee ◽  
Woo Keun Song ◽  
Chul Sang Lee ◽  
Kyung-Kwang Lee ◽  
...  

Development ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.J. Roller ◽  
R.A. Kinloch ◽  
B.Y. Hiraoka ◽  
S.S. Li ◽  
P.M. Wassarman

Ribonuclease protection assays have been used to quantitatively assess changes in steady-state levels of specific mRNAs during oogenesis and early embryogenesis in mice. The mRNAs encode ZP3 (a glycoprotein that serves as a sperm receptor), LDH-B (heart-type lactate dehydrogenase), and MOM-1 (a protein of unknown function). MOM-1 and LDH-B are expressed in a variety of adult mouse tissues and midgestation embryos, whereas ZP3 expression is restricted completely to oocytes. All three mRNAs are expressed by growing mouse oocytes and accumulate to unusually high levels in fully grown oocytes as compared to somatic cells; 240,000, 200,000 and 74,000 copies mRNA per fully grown oocyte for ZP3, LDH-B and MOM-1, respectively. Steady-state levels of LDH-B and MOM-1 mRNA undergo a modest decline (approximately 20–40%) during ovulation when fully grown oocytes become unfertilized eggs and, in general, mirror the reported change in poly(A)+RNA levels during this period of development. On the other hand, the level of ZP3 mRNA declines dramatically (approximately 98%) during ovulation, from approximately 240,000 copies per oocyte to approximately 5000 copies per unfertilized egg, and ZP3 mRNA is undetectable in fertilized eggs (less than 1000 copies per fertilized egg). MOM-1 mRNA is expressed at relatively low levels in morulae (approximately 2000 copies per embryo) and blastocysts (approximately 5000 copies per embryo), whereas ZP3 mRNA remains undetectable (less than 1000 copies per embryo) at these stages of preimplantation development. These findings are discussed in the context of overall gene expression during oocyte growth, meiotic maturation and early embryogenesis in mice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document