scholarly journals Closing the gate: Part-Time faculty instruction in gatekeeper courses and first-year persistence

2008 ◽  
Vol 2008 (115) ◽  
pp. 39-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kevin Eagan ◽  
Audrey J. Jaeger
Keyword(s):  
First Year ◽  
Part Time Faculty ◽  
Part Time ◽  
Faculty Instruction ◽  
Time Faculty

scholarly journals The Effects of Part-Time Faculty on First Semester Freshmen Retention: A Predictive Model Using Logistic Regression

2008 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Audrey J. Jaeger ◽  
Derik Hinz
Keyword(s):  
First Year ◽  
First Year Students ◽  
Campus Environment ◽  
First Semester ◽  
Freshmen Retention ◽  
Part Time Faculty ◽  
Institutional Settings ◽  
Part Time ◽  
Faculty Instruction ◽  
Time Faculty

Part-time faculty clearly serve a valuable purpose in higher education; however, their increased use raises concerns for administrators, faculty, and policy makers. Part-time faculty members spend a greater proportion of their overall time teaching, but the initial evidence suggests that these instructors are less available to students and are less engaged with the campus environment. Recent research attempts to connect part-time faculty utilization to student outcomes. This study explored the effects of exposure to part-time faculty instruction on student retention. Typical first-year students entering the study institution between 1999 and 2003 received over one-quarter of their total first-year instruction from part-time faculty. Furthermore, results show that as exposure to part-time faculty instruction increases, the odds of being retained decrease. Because the use of part-time faculty varies based on institutional type, additional research should focus on diverse institutional settings.

Improving Part-Time Faculty Instruction

1981 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 160-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Rae Price ◽  
Morton Goldman
Keyword(s):  
Part Time Faculty ◽  
Part Time ◽  
Faculty Instruction ◽  
Time Faculty

Both general and focussed improvement in teaching occurred following feedback and teacher/consultant interaction.

scholarly journals Faculty Publishing Productivity: Comparisons over Time

2006 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Budd
Keyword(s):  
Academic Librarians ◽  
Tenure Track ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Part Time Faculty ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Rate Of Increase ◽  
Part Time ◽  
Per Capita ◽  
Time Faculty ◽  
Over Time

Concerns about higher education abound, and these include concerns about productivity. The present study extends two previous examinations of faculty publishing productivity covering the years 1991 to 1993 and 1995 to 1997. Both members of ARL and a group of institutions included in ACRL’s data set are included. For both groups there are some increases in mean total numbers of publications, although the rate of increase has decreased since the second time period. Per capita rates of publication demonstrate an even flatter pattern. In recent years, there have been some changes in the dynamics of universities’ faculties; there are more part-time faculty and more faculty who are not on the tenure track. These factors, coupled with the publishing data, point to activities that all academic librarians should be aware of.

Participation by Women in Annual Meetings, 1970-78

1979 ◽  
Vol 12 (03) ◽  
pp. 318-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Gruberg ◽  
Virginia Sapiro
Keyword(s):  
Political Science ◽  
The United States ◽  
Moderate Increase ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Part Time Faculty ◽  
Faculty Teaching ◽  
Previous Decade ◽  
The Status ◽  
Part Time ◽  
Time Faculty

In the late sixties, women in the United States became sensitized to their second-class status and organized to raise their consciousness and change their conditions. At the same time women in academia began to organize within their disciplines to address the problems they faced there. Political science was no exception; in 1969, when women constituted 5 percent of the membership of the APSA and 8 percent of all political science faculty teaching in colleges and universities, the APSA Committee on the Status of Women in the Profession and the Women's Caucus for Political Science formed. Numerous reports have revealed a moderate increase in the presence of women in the profession in recent years. As Table 1 shows, the percentage of degrees in political science awarded to women has increased since 1970. By the academic year 1976–77 women constituted 11 percent of full-time faculty and 18 percent of part-time faculty. Twenty-three percent of the students entering Ph.D. programs in 1977 were women, a downturn of 3 percent from the previous year, although an overall rise from the previous decade.

Part-time faculty and the law

1978 ◽  
Vol 1978 (18) ◽  
pp. 41-57
Author(s):  
Ronald B. Head ◽  
Edward P. Kelley
Keyword(s):  
Part Time Faculty ◽  
Part Time ◽  
The Law ◽  
Time Faculty

New Policies for Part-Time Faculty

ADE Bulletin ◽  
1982 ◽  
pp. 47-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Elizabeth Wallace
Keyword(s):  
Part Time Faculty ◽  
Part Time ◽  
New Policies ◽  
Time Faculty

A Scandalous Misuse of Faculty—Adjuncts

1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Lauter
Keyword(s):  
Adjunct Faculty ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Full Load ◽  
Part Time Faculty ◽  
Political Interests ◽  
Tenure Decision ◽  
Part Time ◽  
New Varieties ◽  
College Managers ◽  
Time Faculty

While increasing attention began to be focused a decade ago on the scandalous misuse of part-time or “adjunct” faculty in colleges, their use has persistently spread. In fact, new varieties of “temporary” positions continue to be invented by college managers. “Part-time” faculty now include some who teach what amounts to a full load, but who are paid on a credit hour or per course basis, others who scramble for one or two courses each term and are paid flat rates, as well as a few whose salaries and benefits are prorated fractions of those of a full-timer. But there are now many “off-tenure” full-time appointments as well: “lecturers,” whose contracts are renewed every year or two but who may remain in their positions, without tenure, indefinitely; “nontenure-track” instructors and assistant professors, who may stay at an institution for four, six or more years but who, at the point of a tenure decision, must move on; “replacement” appointments, who fill lines for a year or two and then migrate to similar positions elsewhere. I shall use the term “adjunct faculty” or “adjuncts” to describe this quite varied group of individuals, for while the word is not precisely appropriate in all cases, its dictionary definition calls attention to the fact that such faculty, while “joined or added” to the institution, are in critical ways “not essentially a part of it.” Handwringing over the plight of adjuncts has brought no relief, and even most union contracts have so far been marginally helpful. That should be no surprise, for the exploitation of adjuncts serves a number of crucial interests of college managers and of those to whom they report. It is important to identify these interests more clearly if the abuse of this large number of our colleagues is ever to be brought under control, much less halted. For the exploitation of adjuncts is not a function of managerial nastiness, nor is it—any more than was the War on Vietnam—an unfortunate product of historical “accidents.” Rather, it is rooted in a particular conception of college management designed to serve historically distinctive social and political interests.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document