Multipotent adult progenitor cell-loaded demineralized bone matrix for bone tissue engineering

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 275-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Supronowicz ◽  
Elise Gill ◽  
Angelica Trujillo ◽  
Taili Thula ◽  
Rasa Zhukauskas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Tissue ◽  
Progenitor Cell ◽  
Demineralized Bone Matrix ◽  
Bone Matrix ◽  
Multipotent Adult Progenitor Cell ◽  
Demineralized Bone

Human Adipose-Derived Side Population Stem Cells Cultured on Demineralized Bone Matrix for Bone Tissue Engineering

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 789-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Supronowicz ◽  
Elise Gill ◽  
Angelica Trujillo ◽  
Taili Thula ◽  
Rasa Zhukauskas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Stem Cells ◽  
Bone Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Tissue ◽  
Demineralized Bone Matrix ◽  
Side Population ◽  
Bone Matrix ◽  
Cells Cultured ◽  
Demineralized Bone

Experimental Study of Partially Demineralized Bone Matrix as Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffold

2005 ◽  
Vol 288-289 ◽  
pp. 63-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Cui ◽  
Dong Li ◽  
Xiang Dong Liu ◽  
Fanfan Chen ◽  
Wei Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Tissue ◽  
Demineralized Bone Matrix ◽  
Bone Matrix ◽  
Calcium Content ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Demineralized Bone

Objective The purpose of this study is to explore the growth, differentiation and osteogeneration of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) on partially demineralized bone matrix (pDBM) and to generate bone tissue by tissue engineering approach in vivo. Methods Demineralized bone was processed from femur head of Shanghai white swine. Calcium content, porosity and pore size was measured respectively. In vitro osteogenic differentiated human BMSCs of passage 3 were seeded in pDBM. Adhesive rate of cells to pDBM was calculated 24hours after seeding. Distribution, growth and proliferation of BMSCs on pDBM were observed with fluorescent DiI labeling. Matrix disposition was analyzed with SEM observation. Cell-material complex was implanted subcutaneously in nude mice. The implants were harvested at 8, 12 weeks post surgery and samples were observed by H&E staining. Results BMSCs adhered well on the material and the distribution of cells was uniform. The adhesive rate is 99.1%±1%. New bone formation was observed in implant of 8, 12 weeks respectively. The newly formed bone was generated on the surface of the residual material and a layer of cells with typical characteristic of osteoblast was observed to adhere on the surface of the new bone. Conclusion With good biocompatibility to hBMSCs, pDBM could serve as ideal scaffold for bone tissue engineering both in vitro and in vivo.

scholarly journals A novel gelatin/chitooligosaccharide/demineralized bone matrix composite scaffold and periosteum-derived mesenchymal stem cells for bone tissue engineering

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thakoon Thitiset ◽  
Siriporn Damrongsakkul ◽  
Supansa Yodmuang ◽  
Wilairat Leeanansaksiri ◽  
Jirun Apinun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Stem Cells ◽  
Mesenchymal Stem Cells ◽  
Bone Formation ◽  
Bone Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Tissue ◽  
Demineralized Bone Matrix ◽  
Bone Matrix ◽  
Alp Activity

Abstract Background A novel biodegradable scaffold including gelatin (G), chitooligosaccharide (COS), and demineralized bone matrix (DBM) could play a significant part in bone tissue engineering. The present study aimed to investigate the biological characteristics of composite scaffolds in combination of G, COS, and DBM for in vitro cell culture and in vivo animal bioassays. Methods Three-dimensional scaffolds from the mixture of G, COS, and DBM were fabricated into 3 groups, namely, G, GC, and GCD using a lyophilization technique. The scaffolds were cultured with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for 4 weeks to determine biological responses such as cell attachment and cell proliferation, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, calcium deposition, cell morphology, and cell surface elemental composition. For the in vivo bioassay, G, GC, and GCD, acellular scaffolds were implanted subcutaneously in 8-week-old male Wistar rats for 4 weeks and 8 weeks. The explants were assessed for new bone formation using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and von Kossa staining. Results The MSCs could attach and proliferate on all three groups of scaffolds. Interestingly, the ALP activity of MSCs reached the greatest value on day 7 after cultured on the scaffolds, whereas the calcium assay displayed the highest level of calcium in MSCs on day 28. Furthermore, weight percentages of calcium and phosphorus on the surface of MSCs after cultivation on the GCD scaffolds increased when compared to those on other scaffolds. The scanning electron microscopy images showed that MSCs attached and proliferated on the scaffold surface thoroughly over the cultivation time. Mineral crystal aggregation was evident in GC and greatly in GCD scaffolds. H&E staining illustrated that G, GC, and GCD scaffolds displayed osteoid after 4 weeks of implantation and von Kossa staining confirmed the mineralization at 8 weeks in G, GC, and GCD scaffolds. Conclusion The MSCs cultured in GCD scaffolds revealed greater osteogenic differentiation than those cultured in G and GC scaffolds. Additionally, the G, GC, and GCD scaffolds could promote in vivo ectopic bone formation in rat model. The GCD scaffolds exhibited maximum osteoinductive capability compared with others and may be potentially used for bone regeneration.

scholarly journals Osteoinductive potential of small intestinal submucosa/ demineralized bone matrix as composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering

2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 913-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sittisak Honsawek ◽  
Piyanuch Bumrungpanichthaworn ◽  
Voranuch Thanakit ◽  
Vachiraporn Kunrangseesomboon ◽  
Supamongkon Muchmee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Formation ◽  
Bone Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Tissue ◽  
Demineralized Bone Matrix ◽  
Bone Matrix ◽  
Wistar Rat ◽  
New Bone Formation ◽  
Osteoinductive Potential ◽  
Intestinal Submucosa

Abstract Background: Demineralized bone matrix (DBM) is extensively used in orthopedic, periodontal, and maxillofacial application and investigated as a material to induce new bone formation. Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) derived from the submucosa layer of porcine intestine has widely utilized as biomaterial with minimum immune response. Objectives: Determine the osteoinductive potential of SIS, DBM, SIS/DBM composites in the in vitro cell culture and in vivo animal bioassays for bone tissue engineering. Materials and methods: Human periosteal (HPO) cells were treated in the absence or presence SIS, DBM, and SIS/DBM. Cell proliferation was examined by direct cell counting. Osteoblast differentiation of the HPO cells was analyzed with alkaline phosphatase activity assay. The Wistar rat muscle implant model was used to evaluate the osteoinductive potential of SIS, DBM, and SIS/DBM composites. Results: HPO cells could differentiate along osteogenic lineage when treated with either DBM or SIS/DBM. SIS/ DBM had a tendency to promote more cellular proliferation and osteoblast differentiation than the other treatments. In Wistar rat bioassay, SIS showed no new bone formation and the implants were surrounded by fibrous tissues. DBM demonstrated new bone formation along the edge of old DBM particles. SIS/DBM composite exhibited high osteoinductivity, and the residual SIS/DBM was surrounded by osteoid-like matrix and newly formed bone. Conclusion: DBM and SIS/DBM composites could retain their osteoinductive capability. SIS/DBM scaffolds may provide an alternative approach for bone tissue engineering.

scholarly journals Comparing Three Different Three-dimensional Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: An in vivo Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeid Nosouhian ◽  
Amin Davoudi ◽  
Mansour Rismanchian ◽  
Sayed Mohammad Razavi ◽  
Hamidreza Sadeghiyan
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Tissue ◽  
Demineralized Bone Matrix ◽  
Bone Matrix ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Lamellar Bone ◽  
Significant Difference

ABSTRACT Introduction Three-dimensional Scaffold structure of synthetic biomaterials with their interconnected spaces seem to be a safe and effective option in supporting bone regeneration. The aim of this animal study was to compare the effectiveness of three different biocompatible scaffolds: bioglass (BG), demineralized bone matrix (DBM) and forstrite (FR). Materials and methods Four healthy dogs were anesthetized and the first to fourth premolars were extracted atraumatically in each quadrant. After healing, linear incision was prepared from molar to anterior segment and 4 defects in each quadrant (16 defects in each dog) were prepared. Scaffold blocks of BG, DBM and FR were resized according to size of defects and placed in the 12 defects randomly, 4 defects remained as control group. The dogs were sacrificed in 4 time intervals (15, 30, 45 and 60 days after) and the percentage of different types of regenerated bones (lamellar and woven) and connective tissue were recorded in histological process. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and post hoc using SPSS software Ver. 15 at significant level of 0.05. Results In day 30th, although the amount of regenerated lamellar bone in control, DBM and BG Scaffold (22.37 ± 3.44; 21.46 ± 1.96; 21.21 ± 0.96) were near to each, the FR Scaffold provided the highest amount of lamellar (29.71 ± 7.94) and woven bone (18.28 ± 2.35). Also, FR Scaffold showed significant difference with BG (p = 0.026) and DBM Scaffolds (p = 0.032) in regenerated lamellar bone. Conclusion We recommend paying more attention to FR Scaffold as a biomaterial, but it is better to be compared with other nano biomaterials in future studies. How to cite this article Rismanchian M, Nosouhian S, Razavi SM, Davoudi A, Sadeghiyan H. Comparing Three Different Threedimensional Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: An in vivo Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(1):25-30.

Preparation and Characterization of Biomimetic Mesoporous Bioactive Glass-Silk Fibroin Composite Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering

2013 ◽  
Vol 796 ◽  
pp. 9-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cai Hong Lei ◽  
Xin Xing Feng ◽  
Ya Yang Xu ◽  
Yue Rong Li ◽  
Hai Lin Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bioactive Glass ◽  
Bone Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Tissue ◽  
Silk Fibroin ◽  
Composite Scaffold ◽  
Demineralized Bone Matrix ◽  
Bone Matrix ◽  
Composite Scaffolds ◽  
Mesoporous Bioactive Glass

Three-dimensional (3D) mesoporous bioactive glass (MBG) scaffolds were obtained by using the demineralized bone matrix (DBM) and P123 as co-templates through a dip-coating method followed by evaporation induced self-assembly (EISA) process. 3D mesoporous bioactive glass-silk fibroin (MBG/SF) composite scaffolds were prepared by immersing MBG scaffolds into SF solutions with different concentration. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), field mission scanning electron microscope (FESEM), fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and wide angle X-ray diffraction (WA-XRD) were used to analyze the inner pore structures, pore sizes, morphologies and composition of the scaffolds. The in vitro bioactivity of the scaffolds was evaluated by soaking in simulated body fluid (SBF). The results showed that the MBG and MBG/SF composite scaffolds with the interconnected macroporous network and mesoporous walls could be obtained by this method. In addition, both the MBG scaffolds and the MBG/SF composite scaffolds have excellent apatite-forming bioactivity. Therefore, this method provides a simple way to prepare scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Tissue Engineering of Bone by Osteoinductive Biomaterials

MRS Bulletin ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 36-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ugo Ripamonti ◽  
Nicolaas Duneas
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Formation ◽  
Type I Collagen ◽  
Demineralized Bone Matrix ◽  
Bone Matrix ◽  
Mesenchymal Cells ◽  
Tissue Response ◽  
Type I ◽  
New Bone Formation ◽  
Demineralized Bone

Recent advances in materials science and biotechnology have given birth to the new and exciting field of tissue engineering, in which the two normally disparate fields are merging into a profitable matrimony. In particular the use of biomaterials capable of initiating new bone formation via a process called osteoinduction is leading to quantum leaps for the tissue engineering of bone.The classic work of Marshall R. Urist and A. Hari Reddi opened the field of osteoinductive biomaterials. Urist discovered that, upon implantation of devitalized, demineralized bone matrix in the muscle of experimental animals, new bone formation occurs within two weeks, a phenomenon he described as bone formation by induction. The tissue response elicited by implantation of demineralized bone matrix in muscle or under the skin includes activation and migration of undifferentiated mesenchymal cells by chemotaxis, anchoragedependent cell attachment to the matrix, mitosis and proliferation of mesenchymal cells, differentiation of cartilage, mineralization of the cartilage, vascular invasion of the cartilage, differentiation of osteoblasts and deposition of bone matrix, and finally mineralization of bone and differentiation of marrow in the newly developed ossicle.The osteoinductive ability of the extracellular matrix of bone is abolished by the dissociative extraction of the demineralized matrix, but is recovered when the extracted component, itself inactive, is reconstituted with the inactive residue—mainly insoluble collagenous bone matrix. This important experiment showed that the osteoinductive signal resides in the solubilized component but needs to be reconstituted with an appropriate carrier to restore the osteoinductive activity. In this case, the carrier is the insoluble collagenous bone matrix—mainly crosslinked type I collagen.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document