scholarly journals Cocaine alters dendritic spine density in cortical and subcortical brain regions of the postpartum and virgin female rat

Synapse ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 65 (9) ◽  
pp. 955-961 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maya Frankfurt ◽  
Kaliris Salas-Ramirez ◽  
Eitan Friedman ◽  
Victoria Luine
2009 ◽  
Vol 31 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 71-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maya Frankfurt ◽  
Hoau-Yan Wang ◽  
Naydu Marmolejo ◽  
Kalindi Bakshi ◽  
Eitan Friedman

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily M. Parker ◽  
Nathan L. Kindja ◽  
Claire E. J. Cheetham ◽  
Robert A. Sweet

AbstractDendritic spines are small protrusions on dendrites that endow neurons with the ability to receive and transform synaptic input. Dendritic spine number and morphology are altered as a consequence of synaptic plasticity and circuit refinement during adolescence. Dendritic spine density (DSD) is significantly different based on sex in subcortical brain regions associated with the generation of sex-specific behaviors. It is largely unknown if sex differences in DSD exist in auditory and visual brain regions and if there are sex-specific changes in DSD in these regions that occur during adolescent development. We analyzed dendritic spines in 4-week-old (P28) and 12-week-old (P84) male and female mice and found that DSD is lower in female mice due in part to fewer short stubby, long stubby and short mushroom spines. We found striking layer-specific patterns including a significant age by layer interaction and significantly decreased DSD in layer 4 from P28 to P84. Together these data support the possibility of developmental sex differences in DSD in visual and auditory regions and provide evidence of layer-specific refinement of DSD over adolescent brain development.


Author(s):  
Catherine S. Woolley ◽  
Bruce S. McEwen

Dendritic spines cover the surface of a wide variety of neuronal types and are the postsynaptic sites of approximately 90% of the excitatory synapses formed in the central nervous system. Interestingly, changes in the morphology and/or density of dendritic spines have been shown to occur naturally, implying that they are a normal part of brain function. Even in the adult, dendritic spines are remarkably plastic. The hormonal state of an animal has been shown to be an important factor in regulation of dendritic spine density, both during development and in the adult.In the adult female rat, hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells are particularly sensitive to variation in the circulating levels of the ovarian steroids, estradiol and progesterone. Removal of estradiol and progesterone by ovariectomy results in an approximately 50% decrease in the density of dendritic spines on the lateral branches of the apical dendritic tree. Treatment with estradiol can either protect against or reverse this decrease; subsequent progesterone treatment for as few as 5 hours significantly augments the effect of estradiol. By 18-24 hours following progesterone treatment, spine density returns to low values.


2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youge Qu ◽  
Chun Yang ◽  
Qian Ren ◽  
Min Ma ◽  
Chao Dong ◽  
...  

ObjectiveAlthough alterations in the dendritic spine density in the brain regions may play a role in the stress-induced depression-like phenotype, the precise mechanisms are unknown. The aim was to investigate the role of spine density in the brain regions after chronic social defeat stress (CSDS).MethodsWe examined dendritic spine density in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), CA1, CA3, dentate gyrus (DG) of hippocampus, nucleus accumbens (NAc), and ventral tegmental area (VTA) of susceptible and resilient mice after CSDS.ResultsSpine density in the prelimbic area of mPFC, CA3, and DG in the susceptible group, but not resilient group, was significantly lower than control group. In contrast, spine density in the NAc and VTA in the susceptible group, but not resilient group, was significantly higher than control group.ConclusionsThe results suggest that regional differences in spine density may contribute to resilience versus susceptibility in mice subjected to CSDS.


2021 ◽  
pp. 105253
Author(s):  
Katherine M. Bland ◽  
Adam Aharon ◽  
Eden L. Widener ◽  
M. Irene Song ◽  
Zachary O. Casey ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document