Dynamics of bed bug infestations in three low-income housing communities with various bed bug management programs

2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 1302-1310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changlu Wang ◽  
Amanda Eiden ◽  
Narinderpal Singh ◽  
Chen Zha ◽  
Desen Wang ◽  
...  
Insects ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 731-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Narinderpal Singh ◽  
Changlu Wang ◽  
Richard Cooper

Insects ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 402-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changlu Wang ◽  
Kurt Saltzmann ◽  
Gary Bennett ◽  
Timothy Gibb

Insects ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 443
Author(s):  
Salehe Abbar ◽  
Changlu Wang ◽  
Richard Cooper

Bed bug resistance to commonly used pesticide sprays has led to exploring new pesticides and other strategies for bed bug management. Non-chemical methods are effective in bed bug management; however, they do not provide residual protection. Compared to insecticide sprays, dust formulations are considered to provide longer residual control. We evaluated two bed bug management programs in apartment buildings. A building-wide inspection was initially conducted to identify bed bug infested apartments. Selected apartments were divided into two treatment groups: non-chemical plus silica gel dust treatment (10 apartments) and non-chemical treatment (11 apartments). After initial treatment, apartments were re-visited monthly for up to 6 months. During each visit, the total bed bug count per apartment was obtained by examining interceptor traps placed in the apartments and conducting a visual inspection. Mean bed bug count was reduced by 99% and 89% in non-chemical plus silica gel dust and non-chemical treatment, respectively. Non-chemical plus silica gel dust treatment caused significantly higher bed bug count reduction than the non-chemical treatment at 6 months. Bed bugs were eradicated from 40% and 36% of apartments treated with non-chemical plus silica gel dust treatment and non-chemical treatment, respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document