Activation of defence in sweet pepper, Capsicum annum , by cis -jasmone, and its impact on aphid and aphid parasitoid behaviour

2012 ◽  
Vol 68 (10) ◽  
pp. 1419-1429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Y Dewhirst ◽  
Michael A Birkett ◽  
Elisa Loza-Reyes ◽  
Janet L Martin ◽  
Barry J Pye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sweet Pepper ◽  
Aphid Parasitoid ◽  
Capsicum Annum ◽  
Parasitoid Behaviour

Modeling of microwave assisted drying of osmotically pretreated red sweet pepper (Capsicum annum L.)

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 969-978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sachidananda Swain ◽  
D. V. K. Samuel ◽  
Lalit M. Bal ◽  
Abhijit Kar ◽  
G. P. Sahoo
Keyword(s):  
Sweet Pepper ◽  
Microwave Assisted ◽  
Capsicum Annum

New findings on green sweet pepper ( Capsicum annum ) pectins: Rhamnogalacturonan and type I and II arabinogalactans

2017 ◽  
Vol 171 ◽  
pp. 292-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgia Erdmann do Nascimento ◽  
Marcello Iacomini ◽  
Lucimara M.C. Cordeiro
Keyword(s):  
Sweet Pepper ◽  
Type I ◽  
Capsicum Annum ◽  
New Findings

scholarly journals Effects of Plant Growth Regulator on Yield and Economic Benefit of Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annum L.)

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (02) ◽  
pp. 58-64
Author(s):  
S Akhter ◽  
T Mostarin ◽  
K Khatun ◽  
F Akhter ◽  
A Parvin
Keyword(s):  
Acetic Acid ◽  
Plant Growth ◽  
Gibberellic Acid ◽  
Plant Growth Regulators ◽  
Growth Regulators ◽  
Sweet Pepper ◽  
Net Income ◽  
Treatment Combination ◽  
Phenoxy Acetic Acid ◽  
Capsicum Annum

The experiment was conducted in the Horticultural Farm of Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Plant growth regulators were applied which had significant effect on yield of sweet pepper (Capsicum annum L.). The experiment consisted of two factors. Factor A: Plant growth regulators (four levels) as G0: Control, G1: Gibberellic Acid (GA3) @ 30 ppm, G2: 4-Chloro Phenoxy Acetic Acid (4-CPA) @ 45 ppm and G3: 4-Chloro Phenoxy Acetic Acid (4-CPA) @ 45 ppm + Gibberellic Acid (GA3) @ 30 ppm and Factor B: Number of spray (three levels) as N0: Control (no spray), N1: two spray, N2: three spray. In case of plant growth regulators, the highest yield (27.77 t/ha) was found from G3 treatment, whereas the lowest (18.87 t/ha) was from G0 treatment. For number of spray the maximum yield (26.0 t/ha) was recorded from N2 treatment, while the minimum yield (19.87 t/ha) was from N0 treatment. The results indicated that the highest yield (31.8 t/ha) was observed from G3N2 treatment combination, while the lowest yield (17.5 t/ha) was from G0N0 treatment combination. Due to combined effect, the highest yield (31.8 t/ha) with net income (Tk/ha 1416558) and BCR (2.46) was observed from G3N2 treatment combination, while the lowest yield (17.5 t/ha) with net income (Tk/ha 433045) and BCR (1.49) from G0N0 treatment combination. Thus, three times spray with (4- Chloro Phenoxy Acetic Acid + Gibberellic Acid) may be recommended for achieving the higher growth, yield and economic benefit of sweet pepper. The Agriculturists 2018; 16(2) 58-64

scholarly journals Evaluation of the content of pigments and total sugars in ground sweet paprika

10.5219/1120 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 700-705
Author(s):  
Marián Rehuš ◽  
Magdaléna Valšíková
Keyword(s):  
Raw Materials ◽  
Sweet Pepper ◽  
Total Sugars ◽  
Capsicum Annum ◽  
Foreign Origin ◽  
Two Samples ◽  
Domestic Products

The aim of this research was to evaluate and compare the content of pigments and total sugars in raw materials of both the domestic as well as foreign origin that are used in the production of sweet ground pepper. The tests included two samples exported from abroad, specifically from Serbia and China and the following domestic varietes of Capsicum annum L.: Kolora, Žitava, Dvorská (varieties that form the base of the final product called Paprika Žitava/Žitavská paprika and a mix of a number of domestic varieties called Slovenský polotovar. The tests were conducted in 2015 and 2016. The highest content of pigments in both years was contained in Dvorská and Kolora – 6.81 and 6.11 g.kg⁻¹. The largest amount of total sugars was recorded within Žitava in 2015 (20.5%) and in 2016 Slovenský polotovar with 24.5%. Both the exported as well as domestic products fulfilled the parameters of quality required in the production of sweet pepper.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document