Process safety management lessons learned from a petroleum refinery spent caustic tank explosion

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 332-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth P. Bloch ◽  
Dawn M. Wurst
Keyword(s):  
Safety Management ◽  
Petroleum Refinery ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Process Safety ◽  
Spent Caustic

Lessons learned for process safety management in China

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 170-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinsong Zhao ◽  
Johanna Suikkanen ◽  
Maureen Wood
Keyword(s):  
Safety Management ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Process Safety

Integrating Performance Indicator Into the Audit Process Safety Management System

2005 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 161
Author(s):  
C. R. Che Hassan ◽  
M. J. Pitt ◽  
A. J. Wilday
Keyword(s):  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Management System ◽  
Feedback Loop ◽  
Safety Management ◽  
Performance Indicator ◽  
Process Safety ◽  
Audit Process ◽  
Safety Management System ◽  
Audit System ◽  
Similar Elements

The development of the audit method has included the identification of possible performance indicators at each level of the sociotechnical pyramid for a range of areas of work in which accidents have been shown to occur most frequently. The measurementof performance indicators is part of a feedback loop which causes safety improvements. Integration of performance indicators into the audit system has been tested at three operating chemical industries in Terengganu and Selangor in Malaysia. A summary of the weaknesses of the similar elements identified in the three audited plants is presented. Analysis on the approach used enables the identification of deficiencies in safety management aspects. Keywords: Accidents, audit, deficiencies, performance indicators, safety management, and sociotechnical pyramid.

Modified Svensson’s Formula for More Accurate Burst Pressure Predictions of Thin Cylindrical Shells With Small Shell Length to Diameter Ratios

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang-Guk Kang ◽  
Kuao-John Young
Keyword(s):  
Shell Length ◽  
Safety Management ◽  
Cylindrical Shells ◽  
Burst Pressure ◽  
Process Safety ◽  
Finite Element Analyses ◽  
Improved Method ◽  
Displacement Effect ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Small Shell

For process safety management purposes, it is often required in industries to perform burst pressure calculations for pressurized equipment subjected to internal deflagrations. In predictions of burst pressures of vessels with short cylindrical shell sections, the stiffening effects of heads are often overlooked, which may lead to underestimated results. In this paper, a new improved method is proposed for predictions of burst pressures of thin cylindrical shells with small shell length to diameter ratios (L/D) at ambient temperature. The idea is to use the Svensson’s formula, modified by a factor that accounts for the effects of small L/D ratios, head types, and materials for more accurate predictions. Tables of such factors are developed based on study results from a series of elastic-plastic Finite Element Analyses including large displacement effect for different L/D ratios, thicknesses, materials, and head types. Some example problems are presented to validate the method.

scholarly journals A New Semi-Quantitative Process Safety Assessment Method and Its Application for Fluorochemical Industry

Processes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 1695
Author(s):  
Guangpei Cong ◽  
Duhui Lu ◽  
Mei Liu ◽  
Qi Wang ◽  
Wei Yu
Keyword(s):  
Chemical Industry ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Safety Management ◽  
Assessment Method ◽  
Risk Identification ◽  
Main Line ◽  
Process Safety ◽  
Case Comparison ◽  
Improved Model ◽  
Risk Processes

Traditional hazard and operability analysis (HAZOP) is one of the most widely applied methods for process safety management in process enterprises. Due to its principles based on the conservative and qualitative judgment, it often leads to too conservative risk identification results for the fluorine chemical industry usually with high-risk processes to keep the continuity of production. Most of improved quantitative and semi-quantitative methods are based on the layer of protection analysis (LOPA) to resolve the over-conservative problem of traditional HAZOP with the database of LOPA. However, the improved model, taking LOPA as the main line and HAZOP only as the provider of scenarios and influencing factors, is limited to the fact that LOPA can only analyze complete and independent protection layers (IPLs). Therefore, in order to realize the quantitative or semi-quantitative analysis of disaster causes and consequences, a new semi-quantitative HAZOP method takes HAZOP as the main line to integrate LOPA, F&EI (fire and explosion index) for quantitatively calculating the reduction factors, probability on failure demand (PFD) of general protection layers (GPLs) and PFD of IPLs. With the case comparison of fluorine chemical industry, it is proved that this new method can effectively improve the problem that traditional HAZOP are too conservative in complex scenarios.

Effective engagement on process safety fundamentals in challenging times

2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 540
Author(s):  
Olivia K. Cary ◽  
Nick Netscher
Keyword(s):  
Human Performance ◽  
Safety Management ◽  
Health Management ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Activity Levels ◽  
Process Safety ◽  
Product Price ◽  
Hydrocarbon Production ◽  
Safety Risks ◽  
Operations And Maintenance

Esso Australia Resources Pty Ltd (EAPL) and BHP Billiton Petroleum (Bass Strait) Pty Ltd own a range of offshore and onshore hydrocarbon production facilities, which have been operated by EAPL for over 50 years. Over this time, EAPL has lived a rich history of process safety experiences, and developed a range of processes and systems to manage process safety risks. Despite technical system refinement and advances across industry we continue to experience process safety events, and manage risks with plant both at the start and end of its lifecycle. Many of our major hazards are inherent to our operations, and do not become lower risk with lower product price or field activity levels. It is therefore critical that we maintain a laser focus on managing process safety risks during this time of unprecedented change, and find impactful opportunities to engage with operations, maintenance and technical teams on their role in process safety. To this end, EAPL have commenced a journey of scenario based process safety management and applying it to our most significant risks. The outcome has been a step change in process safety literacy across our business, an increased awareness of safe operating conditions and a workforce engaged in managing safeguard health. This study shares how a scenario based approach can leverage a traditional safety case and safety management system approach and make process safety personal: Simplifying communication of higher risks and the equipment and processes that keep us safe Clarifying safeguard ownership and responsibilities for safeguard health management Embedding safeguard health management in routine operations and maintenance tasks Strengthening critical safeguards which mostly depend on human performance to be effective

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document