scholarly journals Understanding the physical basis for the side-chain conformational preferences of methionine

2016 ◽  
Vol 84 (7) ◽  
pp. 900-911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Virrueta ◽  
Corey S. O'Hern ◽  
Lynne Regan
1976 ◽  
Vol 54 (20) ◽  
pp. 3216-3223 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. E. Parr ◽  
Roderick E. Wasylishen ◽  
Ted Schaefer

The stereospecific spin–spin coupling constants over five bonds between the α-proton in the side chain and the protons in the heterocycle in 2-vinylfuran, in its β-nitro and β-aldehydic derivatives, and in 2-vinylthiophene are used to demonstrate the preponderance of the s-trans conformers in polar and nonpolar solutions. These conclusions are compared with predictions made by molecular orbital theory at the STO-3G, INDO, CNDO/2, and MINDO/3 levels. Long-range coupling constants between the protons in the side chain and protons in the heterocycle are calculated by CNDO/2 and INDO–MO–FPT and are compared with experiment. It is concluded that the five-bond couplings involving the α-proton are most sensitive to conformation and that they are transmitted mainly via a σ electron mechanism. The other long-range coupling constants are discussed in terms of σ and π electron mechanisms. The STO-3G calculations yield barriers to internal rotation of greater than 4.8 kcal/mol.


Biomolecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Andrews ◽  
Shuting Zhang ◽  
Reinhard Schweitzer-Stenner ◽  
Brigita Urbanc

Conformational preferences of amino acid residues in water are determined by the backbone and side-chain properties. Alanine is known for its high polyproline II (pPII) propensity. The question of relative contributions of the backbone and side chain to the conformational preferences of alanine and other amino acid residues in water is not fully resolved. Because glycine lacks a heavy-atom side chain, glycine-based peptides can be used to examine to which extent the backbone properties affect the conformational space. Here, we use published spectroscopic data for the central glycine residue of cationic triglycine in water to demonstrate that its conformational space is dominated by the pPII state. We assess three commonly used molecular dynamics (MD) force fields with respect to their ability to capture the conformational preferences of the central glycine residue in triglycine. We show that pPII is the mesostate that enables the functional backbone groups of the central residue to form the most hydrogen bonds with water. Our results indicate that the pPII propensity of the central glycine in GGG is comparable to that of alanine in GAG, implying that the water-backbone hydrogen bonding is responsible for the high pPII content of these residues.


2016 ◽  
Vol 138 (33) ◽  
pp. 10386-10389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Watkins ◽  
Richard Bonneau ◽  
Paramjit S. Arora

The Analyst ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 140 (20) ◽  
pp. 6933-6944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunying Xiao ◽  
Lisa M. Pérez ◽  
David H. Russell

The factors affecting conformational preference of gas phase peptide ions are investigated by IM-MS and molecular dynamics simulation.


1979 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 807-812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
Walter Niemczura ◽  
Chiu-Ming Wong ◽  
Kirk Marat

A complete analysis of the 1H and 19F nmr spectra of 2,5- and 3,4-difluorobenzotrifluoride, together with multiple resonance experiments, yields the signs and magnitudes of the long-range 19F,19F and 1H,19F spin–spin coupling constants. The coupling mechanisms are discussed. In particular, the coupling over six bonds, [Formula: see text], whose sign is interpretable in terms of a σ–π mechanism, is too large in magnitude when compared to [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] in the analogous compounds. These latter three couplings are consistent in sign and magnitude with what is known about hyperfine interaction constants. The magnitudes of [Formula: see text] are reported for 4-fluorobenzotrifluoride, 3-amino-4-fluorobenzotrifluoride, 3-nitro-4-fluorobenzotrifluoride, as are 6JpF,F values for p-fluorobenzal fluoride and p-fluorobenzyl fluoride. In contrast to 6JpH,CH and 6JpF,CH it seems unlikely that, unless its coupling mechanism becomes more precisely understood, 6JpF,CF will be a reliable indicator of conformational preferences.


Author(s):  
Valeska Gerhardt ◽  
Maya Tutughamiarso ◽  
Michael Bolte

Hydantoin-5-acetic acid [2-(2,5-dioxoimidazolidin-4-yl)acetic acid] and orotic acid (2,6-dioxo-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyrimidine-4-carboxylic acid) each contain one rigid acceptor–donor–acceptor hydrogen-bonding site and a flexible side chain, which can adopt different conformations. Since both compounds may be used as coformers for supramolecular complexes, they have been crystallized in order to examine their conformational preferences, giving solvent-free hydantoin-5-acetic acid, C5H6N2O4, (I), and three crystals containing orotic acid, namely, orotic acid dimethyl sulfoxide monosolvate, C5H4N2O4·C2H6OS, (IIa), dimethylammonium orotate–orotic acid (1/1), C2H8N+·C5H3N2O4−·C5H4N2O4, (IIb), and dimethylammonium orotate–orotic acid (3/1), 3C2H8N+·3C5H3N2O4−·C5H4N2O4, (IIc). The crystal structure of (I) shows a three-dimensional network, with the acid function located perpendicular to the ring. Interestingly, the hydroxy O atom acts as an acceptor, even though the carbonyl O atom is not involved in any hydrogen bonds. However, in (IIa), (IIb) and (IIc), the acid functions are only slightly twisted out of the ring planes. All H atoms of the acidic functions are directed away from the rings and, with respect to the carbonyl O atoms, they show an antiperiplanar conformation in (I) and synperiplanar conformations in (IIa), (IIb) and (IIc). Furthermore, in (IIa), (IIb) and (IIc), different conformations of the acid O=C—C—N torsion angle are observed, leading to different hydrogen-bonding arrangements depending on their conformation and composition.


2014 ◽  
Vol 70 (a1) ◽  
pp. C499-C499
Author(s):  
Dale Tronrud ◽  
P. Karplus

Have you ever seen a feature in your structure and asked, "I wonder how novel this is?" For instance a residue with a certain phi/psi angle, or an Asp residue followed by three further residues that make a tight turn centered on the side chain, or a peptide unit deviating 25° from planarity? If so, the Protein Geometry Database (PGD) is something you'll want to know about. The PGD web service (pgd.science.oregonstate.edu, Berkholz 2009a) manages access to a database containing the geometric details of 1.9 million amino acids. Working with the PGD involves two easy steps - using a search form to find a set of peptides matching your interests, and analyzing the geometric details of the set. The search form allows you to find examples of peptide fragments that have any specified combination of backbone conformations and sequence. Filtering can also be performed based on side chain conformations, or bond angles. You can also specify the quality of models included in the search. Once a set of peptides has been identified, their geometric properties can be analyzed on the web site. You can look at the averages and standard deviations for any bond length, bond angle, or conformational angle, or you can explore relationships between properties by displaying highly customizable plots. An option to export the search results allows you to perform any further analyses you might devise. We will show how the PGD has been used to develop a Conformation Dependent Library of main chain bond angle targets for crystallographic refinement (Berkholz 2009b), as well as to advance our understanding of peptide non-planarity, and of conformational preferences for pairs of residues and of cis-peptides. We will also describe how simple searches for outliers in bond lengths and angles are a powerful validation tool that can both uncovering errors in PDB models and can lead to the discovery of very interesting and real deviations from what is normally considered ideal geometry.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document