Structural features of the inactive and active states of the melanin-concentrating hormone receptors: Insights from molecular simulations

2004 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 430-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosa Maria Vitale ◽  
Carlo Pedone ◽  
Pier G. De Benedetti ◽  
Francesca Fanelli
1998 ◽  
Vol 333 (2) ◽  
pp. 301-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary B. WILLARS ◽  
Craig A. McARDLE ◽  
Stefan R. NAHORSKI

In the present study we have expressed the muscarinic M3 receptor in an immortalized mouse pituitary cell line (αT3-1), which expresses an endogenous gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor, to examine potential differences in acute receptor regulation. Both of these receptors couple to the activation of phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C (PLC) in these cells and we demonstrate that, despite expression in the same cell background, acute desensitization is a feature of muscarinic M3 receptors but not of GnRH receptors. We show that, when the concentrations of GnRH and methacholine are matched to give approximately equivalent maximal elevations of Ins(1,4,5)P3, the GnRH receptor is able to sustain PLC activity at the initial rate, whereas the muscarinic M3 receptor cannot. Thus PLC-activating G-protein-coupled receptors are able to undergo rapid desensitization in this cell line, indicating that the desensitization profile is receptor-specific rather than cell-specific. This argues strongly that post-receptor regulatory features do not have a prominent role in mediating rapid desensitization in these cells. Furthermore GnRH receptor-mediated PLC activity is sustained despite a marked and persistent depletion in the steady-state level of PtdIns(4,5)P2. In contrast, activation of muscarinic receptors is not sustained despite only a transient decrease in PtdIns(4,5)P2 concentration. Thus, whereas the contribution of PtdIns(4,5)P2 depletion to the temporal profile of receptor-mediated PLC signalling has been difficult to assess, the present results demonstrate that this is unlikely to be of importance in these cells. We suggest that unique structural features of the GnRH receptor result in a lack of appropriate regulatory phospho-acceptor sites and that the absence of agonist-dependent phosphorylation might underlie the lack of acute regulation.


2011 ◽  
Vol 169 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 6-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akie Hamamoto ◽  
Kanta Mizusawa ◽  
Akiyoshi Takahashi ◽  
Yumiko Saito

Peptides ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 1990-1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanta Mizusawa ◽  
Yumiko Saito ◽  
Zhiwei Wang ◽  
Yuki Kobayashi ◽  
Kouhei Matsuda ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (66) ◽  
pp. 43-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer C. Brookes ◽  
Mario D. Galigniana ◽  
Anthony H. Harker ◽  
A. Marshall Stoneham ◽  
Gavin P. Vinson

Understanding how structural features determine specific biological activities has often proved elusive. With over 161 000 steroid structures described, an algorithm able to predict activity from structural attributes would provide manifest benefits. Molecular simulations of a range of 35 corticosteroids show striking correlations between conformational mobility and biological specificity. Thus steroid ring A is important for glucocorticoid action, and is rigid in the most specific (and potent) examples, such as dexamethasone. By contrast, ring C conformation is important for the mineralocorticoids, and is rigid in aldosterone. Other steroids that are less specific, or have mixed functions, or none at all, are more flexible. One unexpected example is 11-deoxycorticosterone, which the methods predict (and our activity studies confirm) is not only a specific mineralocorticoid, but also has significant glucocorticoid activity. These methods may guide the design of new corticosteroid agonists and antagonists. They will also have application in other examples of ligand–receptor interactions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document