Polyethylene-CaCO3 hybrid via CaCO3 -controlled crystallization in emulsion

2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 1289-1292
Author(s):  
Stanislaw Penczek ◽  
Krzysztof Kaluzynski ◽  
Julia Pretula
2019 ◽  
Vol 103 (5-8) ◽  
pp. 3057-3065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oleg E. Markov ◽  
Oleksiy V. Gerasimenko ◽  
Alexander A. Shapoval ◽  
Oleksandr R. Abdulov ◽  
Roman U. Zhytnikov

2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jijun Wang ◽  
Yinjie Sun ◽  
Yun Huang ◽  
Erqiang Chen ◽  
Huihui Li ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 182 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.T. Clavaguera-Mora ◽  
J.A. Diego ◽  
M.D. Baró ◽  
S. Surifiach ◽  
N. Clavaguera ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
pp. 152487
Author(s):  
Xi Zhang ◽  
Panpan Dang ◽  
Bo Deng ◽  
Xiaochao Xia ◽  
Kaiti Wang ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsin-Lung Chen ◽  
Roger S. Porter

ABSTRACTThermal Mechanical analysis (TMA) has been used to study the crystallization behavior of poly (ether ether ketone) (PEEK) and its blends with poly (ether imide) (PEI). The two crystallization stages of PEEK are clearly distinguished by measuring the variation of film thickness with time during isothermal crystallization. Upon blending with PEI, the distinction of the two PEEK crystallization stages becomes obscure. This is attributed to the depressions in both nucleation density and spherulite growth rate upon blending with PEI.An Avrami analysis, Modified by considering both primary and secondary crystallization, is used to extract the respective kinetic behavior of these two crystallization stages. The results indicate that the secondary crystallization proceeded slower than the primary crystallization in the diffusion-controlled crystallization region. On the other hand, these two crystallization stages proceeded at comparable rate in the thermodynamically-controlled crystallization region. It is also found in the diffusion-controlled crystallization that blending with PEI induced a larger depression in the secondary crystallization rate than in the primary crystallization rate. Explanations for these observations are proposed and discussed.


Polymers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (16) ◽  
pp. 2695
Author(s):  
Marcin Lemanowicz ◽  
Anna Mielańczyk ◽  
Tomasz Walica ◽  
Milena Kotek ◽  
Andrzej Gierczycki

The application of polymers as a tool in the crystallization process is gaining more and more interest among the scientific community. According to Web of Science statistics the number of papers dealing with “Polymer induced crystallization” increased from 2 in 1990 to 436 in 2020, and for “Polymer controlled crystallization”—from 4 in 1990 to 344 in 2020. This is clear evidence that both topics are vivid, attractive and intensively investigated nowadays. Efficient control of crystallization and crystal properties still represents a bottleneck in the manufacturing of crystalline materials ranging from pigments, antiscalants, nanoporous materials and pharmaceuticals to semiconductor particles. However, a rapid development in precise and reliable measuring methods and techniques would enable one to better describe phenomena involved, to formulate theoretical models, and probably most importantly, to develop practical indications for how to appropriately lead many important processes in the industry. It is clearly visible at the first glance through a number of representative papers in the area, that many of them are preoccupied with the testing and production of pharmaceuticals, while the rest are addressed to new crystalline materials, renewable energy, water and wastewater technology and other branches of industry where the crystallization process takes place. In this work, authors gathered and briefly discuss over 100 papers, published in leading scientific periodicals, devoted to the influence of polymers on crystallizing solutions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document