Five-factor model personality domains in the prediction of Axis II personality disorders: An exploratory study in late adulthood women non-clinical sample

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joana Henriques-Calado ◽  
Maria Eugénia Duarte-Silva ◽  
Diana Junqueira ◽  
Carlota Sacoto ◽  
Ana Marta Keong
Keyword(s):  
Personality Disorders ◽  
Exploratory Study ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Clinical Sample ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Late Adulthood ◽  
Axis Ii

Structure of the Coolidge Axis II Inventory Personality Disorder Scales from the Five-Factor Model Perspective

1998 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 947-952 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nerella V. Ramanaiah ◽  
J. Patrick Sharpe
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Analysis ◽  
Personality Disorders ◽  
Canonical Correlation Analysis ◽  
Canonical Correlation ◽  
Simple Structure ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Canonical Variate ◽  
Axis Ii ◽  
Canonical Variates

Coolidge, et al. in 1994 tested the generality and comprehensiveness of the five-factor model of personality as applied to personality disorders by performing a canonical correlation analysis for the scales from the Coolidge Axis II Inventory and the NEO Personality Inventory testing 178 undergraduates (106 men and 72 women). Their results did not support the generality and comprehensiveness of the five-factor model for interpreting the structure of personality disorders. A major problem with this study was that the data did not show good simple structure and meaningfulness because no rotation was performed for the canonical variates. The present study tested the hypothesis that the results of Coolidge, et al. might be attributed to the failure to rotate canonical variates to obtain good simple structure. For 220 students in introductory psychology (104 men and 116 women), canonical correlation analysis with varimax rotation was performed for scores on the Coolidge Axis II Inventory scales and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory scales. The analysis indicated five canonical variate pairs which were interpreted as Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Disagreeableness, and Conscientiousness, supporting the tested hypothesis as well as the generality and comprehensiveness of this model for describing the structure of personality disorders.

scholarly journals Prototype Matching of Personality Disorders with the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas de Francisco Carvalho ◽  
Ricardo Primi
Keyword(s):  
Personality Disorders ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Clinical Sample ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Validity Evidence ◽  
Diagnostic Categories ◽  
Prototype Matching ◽  
Empirical Relations ◽  
Dsm Iv

ABSTRACT This study aimed to investigate validity evidence of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory (IDCP) through the expected associations with the five-factor model (FFM), especially in regard to the prototype matching of personality disorders. A non-clinical sample (N=94), aged between 19 and 55 years (M=25.5; SD=7.35), and 59.6% male, answered the IDCP and the NEO-PI-R for the assessment of 12 dimensions related to personality disorders and evaluation of five personality dimensions, respectively. The results pointed to consistent empirical relations between the dimensions of the IDCP and the NEO-PI-R, as well as between the diagnostic categories of DSM-IV-TR based on the FFM and the IDCP dimensions.

scholarly journals Five-factor model of personality disorders: Spanish normative data and validation

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joaquín Colodro ◽  
Juan J. López-García ◽  
Laura Mezquita ◽  
Lucía Colodro-Conde ◽  
Manuel I. Ibáñez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Personality Disorders ◽  
Normative Data ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Clinical Sample ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Applied Psychology ◽  
Ex Post ◽  
Ex Post Facto ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Ex Post Facto Study

The categorical approach of personality disorders (PD) has given way to a dimensional paradigm. Within this, the Five-factor model (FFM) proposes theoretical hypotheses describing personality pathologies and PD empirical prototypes based on the DSM (DSM-PD). Moreover, a methodology to score DSM-PD using the NEO PI-R facets was developed. In this ex post-facto study FFM-PD count norms were developed using data from the NEO PI-R Spanish adaptation. Furthermore, the diagnostic agreement with the IPDE and validity of FFM-PD counts was analyzed in a clinical (<em>n</em> = 222) and non-clinical sample (<em>n</em> = 742). Based on NEO PI-R scores, we presented Spanish FFM-PD normative data. FFM-PD benchmarks were highly likely to be exceeded if subjects were classified as a subclinical case in the DSM-PD. Convergent correlations of FFM-PD counts with their equivalent subclinical cases of DSM-PD were statistically significant and outperformed any divergent correlation as well as the average divergent correlations in all FFM-PD. The use of a count technique based on NEO PI-R facets and Spanish FFM-PD normative data facilitate PD understanding and interpretation in various applied psychology fields.

On the Relationship of the Five-Factor Personality Model to Personality Disorders: Four Reservations

1994 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick L. Coolidge ◽  
Lee A. Becker ◽  
David C. DiRito ◽  
Robert L. Durham ◽  
Melanie M. Kinlaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Personality Disorders ◽  
Multivariate Analyses ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Axis Ii ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Limited Usefulness

McCrae and Costa since 1986 have proferred a five-factor personality model as a lingua franca among different psychometric test users, and they suggest that their operationalization of the five-factor model, the NEO Personality Inventory, may also be useful in the clinical assessment of the abnormal personality. The present study examined the inventory and its relationship to the 11 personality disorders of Axis II of DSM-III—R in a sample of 180 adults. Correlational multivariate analyses appear to indicate a limited usefulness of the five-factor model in the understanding of personality disorders, and four major objections are offered. Further research with clinical samples, other models of personality, and other measures of personality disorders are encouraged.

scholarly journals Personality inventory for DSM-5 brief form(PID-5-BF) in Chinese students and patients: evaluating the five-factor model and a culturally informed six-factor model

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Panwen Zhang ◽  
Zirong Ouyang ◽  
Shulin Fang ◽  
Jiayue He ◽  
Lejia Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Personality Disorders ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Clinical Sample ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Culturally Informed ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form (PID-5-BF) is a 25-item measuring tool evaluating maladaptive personality traits for the diagnosis of personality disorders(PDs). As a promising scale, its impressive psychometric properties have been verified in some countries, however, there have been no studies about the utility of the PID-5-BF in Chinese settings. The current study aimed to explore the maladaptive personality factor model which was culturally adapted to China and to examine psychometric properties of the PID-5-BF among Chinese undergraduate students and clinical patients. Methods Seven thousand one hundred fifty-five undergraduate students and 451 clinical patients completed the Chinese version of the PID-5-BF. Two hundered twenty-eight students were chosen randomly for test-retest reliability at a 4-week interval. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted to discover the most suitable factor structure in China, measurement invariance(MI), internal consistency, and external validity were also calculated. Results The theoretical five-factor model was acceptable, but the exploratory six-factor model was more applicable in both samples (Undergraduate sample: CFI = 0.905, TLI = 0.888, RMSEA = 0.044, SRMR = 0.039; Clinical sample: CFI = 0.904, TLI = 0.886, RMSEA = 0.047, SRMR = 0.060). In the Chinese six-factor model, the Negative Affect domain was divided into two factors and the new factor was named “Interpersonal Relationships”, which was in line with the Big-Six Personality model in Chinese. Measurement invariance across non-clinical and clinical sample was established (configural, weak, strong MI, and partial strict MI). Aside from acceptable internal consistency (Undergraduate sample: alpha = 0.84, MIC = 0.21; Clinical sample: alpha = 0.86, MIC = 0.19) and test-retest reliability(0.73), the correlation between the 25-item PID-5-BF and the 220-item PID-5 was significant(p < 0.01). The six PDs measured by Personality diagnostic questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+) were associated with and predicted by expected domains of PID-5-BF. Conclusions Both the theoretical five-factor model and the exploratory six-factor model of the PID-5-BF were acceptable to the Chinese population. The five-factor model could allow for comparison and integration with other work on the original theoretical model. However, the Chinese six-factor structure may be more culturally informed in East Asian settings. In sum, the PID-5-BF is a convenient and useful screening tool for personality disorders.

Comparison of categorical and dimensional approaches to the diagnosis of personality disorders

2020 ◽  
pp. 15-25
Author(s):  
T. G. Gadisov ◽  
A. A. Tkachenko
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Personality Disorders ◽  
Big Five ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Personality Structure ◽  
Categorical Approach ◽  
Personal Traits ◽  
Clinical Method ◽  
Neo Five Factor Inventory

Summary. Objective: A comparative study of the personality structure from the perspective the Five-factor personality model (“Big Five”) in mentally healthy and in people with personality disorders depending on the leading radical determined by the clinical method.Materials and methods: a comparative study of personality structures in the mentally healthy (13 people) and in individuals with personality disorders (47 people) was carried out. To assess the personality structure, the NEO-Five Factor Inventory questionnaire was used. Persons with personality disorders were divided into groups in accordance with the leading radical: 24 — with emotionally unstable; 13 — with a histrionic; 6 — with schizoid; 4 — with paranoid radicals.Results: There were no differences in the values of the domains of the Five-Factor personality model between a group of individuals with personality disorders and the norm. The features of domain indicators of the Five-factor personality model were revealed in individuals with personality disorder depending on theradical.Conclusion: The NEO-Five Factor Inventory questionnaire, like most other tools from the perspective of the Five-Factor Model, is not suitable for assessing a person in terms of assigning it to variants of a mental disorder. When comparing the categorical and dimensional approaches to assessing the structure of personality disorders, it was found that the obligate personality traits identified using the categorical approach are fully reflected in the «Big Five» in individuals with a leading schizoid radical. The relations of obligate personal traits with the domains of the Five-factor model of personality in individuals with other (paranoid, histrionic,and emotionally unstable) radicals are less clear.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document