Surface texture characterization of injection-molded pigmented plastics

2004 ◽  
Vol 44 (9) ◽  
pp. 1615-1626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Ariño ◽  
Ulf Kleist ◽  
Gustavo Gil Barros ◽  
Per-Åke Johansson ◽  
Mikael Rigdahl
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 5089
Author(s):  
Arun Prasanth Nagalingam ◽  
Moiz Sabbir Vohra ◽  
Pulkit Kapur ◽  
Swee Hock Yeo

Surface texture characterization of components built using additive manufacturing (AM) remains a challenge. The presence of various asperities and random roughness distributions across a surface poses several challenges to users in selecting an appropriate cut-off wavelength (λc), evaluation length (ln), and measurement area. This paper investigates a modified framework for surface texture characterization of AM components. First, the surface asperities in an AM component were identified through scanning electron microscope (SEM) analyses. The maximum diameter (φm) of the surface asperities were determined through image processing and were used as cut-off for surface texture evaluation. Second, another set of surface texture results were extracted using standard measurement procedures per ISO 4287, 4288, 25178-1, -2, and -3. Third, the investigative measurement framework’s effectiveness and suitability were explored by comparing the results with ISO standard results. Last, the effects of using non-standard cut-off wavelength, evaluation length, and measurement area during surface texture characterization were studied, and their percentage deviations from the standard values were discussed. The key findings prove that (a) the evaluation length could be compromised instead of cut-off, (b) measurement area must be 2.5 times the maximum asperity size present in the surface, and (c) it is possible to identify, distinguish, and evaluate specific features from the AM surface by selecting appropriate filters, thereby characterizing them specifically. The investigations and the obtained results serve as valuable data for users to select appropriate measurement settings for surface texture evaluation of AM components.


2021 ◽  
pp. 002203452110056
Author(s):  
A.T. Hara ◽  
D. Elkington-Stauss ◽  
P.S. Ungar ◽  
F. Lippert ◽  
G.J. Eckert ◽  
...  

This in situ erosive tooth wear (ETW) study tested enamel 3-dimensional (3D) surface texture outcomes for the detection and differentiation of ETW lesions simulated in clinically relevant conditions. Twenty participants enrolled in this 3-arm crossover intraoral ETW simulation and wore their own partial denture for 14 d holding 2 human enamel specimens (per arm). In each arm, participants were assigned to 1 of 3 different dental erosion protocols: severe (lemon juice/pH 2.5), moderate (grapefruit juice/pH 3.5), and no erosion (bottled drinking water, control). Enamel specimens were evaluated by white-light scanning confocal profilometry for 3D surface texture and surface loss (ETW model validation). Individual point clouds were analyzed using standard dental microwear texture characterization protocols for surface roughness and anisotropy. Fractal complexity ( Asfc), texture aspect ratio ( Str), and arithmetical mean height ( Sa) values were generated at baseline, 7 d, and 14 d. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance models suitable for the crossover design with repeated measurements, and correlation coefficients were used to examine the relationship between outcomes. Asfc and Sa differentiated ETW severity (no erosion < moderate < severe, P < 0.001) at days 7 and 14. Asfc and Sa were lower at baseline compared to days 7 and 14 ( P < 0.001) for moderate and severe challenges. Asfc increased from day 7 to 14 ( P = 0.042) for the severe challenge. For Str, ETW severity did not have a significant effect overall ( P = 0.15). Asfc and Sa were highly positively correlated ( r = 0.89, P < 0.001), while Asfc and Sa were not correlated overall with Str ( r < 0.1, P ≥ 0.25). Enamel surface loss increased with ETW severity (no erosion < moderate < severe, P < 0.001) at days 7 and 14, validating the ETW simulation model. Complexity ( Asfc) and roughness ( Sa) outcomes were able to detect and differentiate ETW levels, with Asfc being able to monitor the progression of severe lesions. No clear characterization of ETW lesions could be provided by the anisotropy ( Str) parameter.


Measurement ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 2022-2028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pinar Demircioglu ◽  
Ismail Bogrekci ◽  
Numan M. Durakbasa

2021 ◽  
Vol 272 ◽  
pp. 121947
Author(s):  
Calypso Chadfeau ◽  
Safiullah Omary ◽  
Essia Belhaj ◽  
Christophe Fond ◽  
Françoise Feugeas

2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 4594-4604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhisham N. Sharma ◽  
Seth A. Kijewski ◽  
Leonard S. Fifield ◽  
Yongsoon Shin ◽  
Charles L. Tucker ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document