In-plane permeability measurement and analysis in liquid composite molding

1994 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 278-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. James Wang ◽  
C. H. Wu ◽  
L. James Lee
2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyong Liang ◽  
Chuck Zhang ◽  
Ben Wang ◽  
Chiang Shih

Abstract In a liquid composite molding (LCM) process such as resin transfer molding (RTM), quality control depends on an in-situ permeability profile of the fibrous preform taken just before resin injection. However, the conventional permeability measurement method, which uses liquid (oil or resin) as its working fluid, only measures the average preform permeability in an off-line mode. It cannot be used to create an in-situ permeability profile because of fiber pollution, and cannot be used to reveal local permeability variations of preform. This study develops a new permeability characterization method that uses gas flow and pressure profiles to measure preform permeability variation in a closed mold assembly. This method is based upon two research findings: (1) that the air permeability of a preform can be obtained through measuring the pressure profile of gas flow, and (2) that resin permeability is highly correlated with air permeability for the same fiber preform. In this paper, the validity of this method is discussed. Experimental results of gas permeability measurement with defective and defect-free preforms are presented, and quantitative models for correlation of gas permeability versus pressure profile and of gas permeability versus resin permeability are also provided. Finally, the efficacy of the proposed method is illustrated through experimental results.


2011 ◽  
Vol 311-313 ◽  
pp. 214-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Hua Jiang ◽  
Ze Xing Wang ◽  
Nan Liang Chen

Processes of the Liquid Composite Molding (LCM) are widely used in composites produced by impregnation of a dry preform with liquid resin. The resin flow through the preform is usually described by Darcy’s law and the permeability tensor must be obtained for filling process analysis and characterizing the ability of a porous material to be impregnated by a resin fluid. In generally, resin flow in the thickness direction can be neglected for thin parts, but the resin flow in the transverse direction is important for thicker parts. In this study, the transverse permeability measurement device using ultrasound method was developed, the transverse flowfront could be calculated, and global effective permeability and transverse were studied.


1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.-H. Wu ◽  
H.-T. Chiu ◽  
L. J. Lee ◽  
S. Nakamura

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 367-381
Author(s):  
Mack Boris Nziengui ◽  
Hind Abdellaoui ◽  
Jamal Echaabi ◽  
Mohamed Hattabi

Aerospace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Sicong Yu ◽  
Xufeng Zhang ◽  
Xiaoling Liu ◽  
Chris Rudd ◽  
Xiaosu Yi

In this concept-proof study, a preform-based RTM (Resin Transfer Molding) process is presented that is characterized by first pre-loading the solid curing agent onto the preform, and then injecting the liquid nonreactive resin with an intrinsically low viscosity into the mold to infiltrate and wet the pre-loaded preform. The separation of resin and hardener helped to process inherently high viscosity resins in a convenient way. Rosin-sourced, anhydrite-cured epoxies that would normally be regarded as unsuited to liquid composite molding, were thus processed. Rheological tests revealed that by separating the anhydrite curing agent from a formulated RTM resin system, the remaining epoxy liquid had its flowtime extended. C-scan and glass transition temperature tests showed that the preform pre-loaded with anhydrite was fully infiltrated and wetted by the liquid epoxy, and the two components were diffused and dissolved with each other, and finally, well reacted and cured. Composite laminates made via this approach exhibited roughly comparable quality and mechanical properties with prepreg controls via autoclave or compression molding, respectively. These findings were verified for both carbon and ramie fiber composites.


2001 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joy P. Dunkers ◽  
Joseph L. Lenhart ◽  
Sylvia R. Kueh ◽  
John H. van Zanten ◽  
Suresh G. Advani ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document