scholarly journals The Vietnamese version of the nursing critical thinking in clinical practice questionnaire: Translation and psychometric evaluation

Nursing Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuan Van Nguyen ◽  
Hsueh‐Erh Liu
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Psychometric Evaluation ◽  
Questionnaire Translation

Perspectives from a pediatrician about diagnostic errors

Diagnosis ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geeta Singhal
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Diagnostic Errors ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Personal Experiences ◽  
Key Concepts

AbstractThis opinion paper provides perspectives from a pediatrician about diagnostic challenges in caring for children. This essay shares personal experiences and lessons learned from a pediatric hospitalist about caring for children and making errors in diagnosis. This piece offers guidance about how to teach medical learners key concepts about error in diagnosis with underscoring the importance of developing critical thinking skills. Finally, the author offers tips from the literature about how physicians and other care providers can reorganize their own thinking (metacognition) to address their clinical practice.

scholarly journals Examining Psychometric Characteristics of a Menopausal Health Questionnaire: Translation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version

10.19082/3616 ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 3616-3622
Author(s):  
Nasibeh Sharifi ◽  
Somayyeh Khazaeian ◽  
Safoura Khazaeian ◽  
Marzieh Masjoudi ◽  
Azita Fathnejad Kazemi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Evaluation ◽  
Health Questionnaire ◽  
Psychometric Characteristics ◽  
Questionnaire Translation ◽  
Persian Version

scholarly journals Technology—supported guidance models stimulating the development of critical thinking in clinical practice: A mixed methods systematic review protocol (Preprint)

10.2196/25126 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaroslav Zlamal ◽  
Edith Lillian Roth Gjevjon ◽  
Mariann Fossum ◽  
Marianne Trygg Solberg ◽  
Simen Alexander Steindal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Systematic Review Protocol ◽  
Review Protocol

scholarly journals The Vietnamese Version of the Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire: Translation and Psychometric Evaluation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuan Van Nguyen ◽  
Hsueh-Erh Liu
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Nursing Education ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Setting ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
International Comparisons ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Thinking Ability

Abstract Background: Many instruments measure critical thinking ability in nursing education. The Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire (N-CT-4 Practice) is a new tool to measure the level of critical thinking ability of nurses in a clinical setting. However, no study has evaluated the psychometric properties of the N-CT-4 Practice in Vietnam. Therefore, this study translated and evaluated the validity and reliability of the Vietnamese version of the Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire (V-N-CT-4 Practice). Results: The V-N-CT-4 Practice questionnaire retained the meaning of the original English version and was clear, explicit and easy for nurses to understand. The item content validity index of the V-N-CT-4 Practice was 1.0. The Cronbach’s alpha for the overall scales was .98. The intraclass correlation coefficient was .81. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that this Vietnamese version fit the proposed model. Conclusions: The findings suggested that the V-N-CT-4 Practice has acceptable reliability and validity for Vietnamese nurses in a clinical setting. Nurse managers and educators can use the V-N-CT-4 Practice to measure the level of critical thinking ability of Vietnamese clinical nurses and make international comparisons possible.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document