Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) exception for portopulmonary hypertension

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (S3) ◽  
pp. S114-S116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Krowka ◽  
Michael B. Fallon ◽  
David C. Mulligan ◽  
Robert G. Gish
PeerJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. e9243
Author(s):  
Xin Yin ◽  
Yueming Shao ◽  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Hui Gao ◽  
Tingting Qin ◽  
...  

Objectives To demonstrate the screening value of echocardiography for portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) in liver transplant candidates. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Background POPH is a complication of end-stage liver disease that adversely affects the outcome of orthotopic liver transplant. There are no specific symptoms in the early stage of POPH. POPH reduce the survival rate of patients with end-stage liver disease specially if they are not diagnosed. Therefore, early detection may improve prognosis. The objective of this study is to explore the screening value of echocardiography on liver transplant candidates for screening of POPH compared to right heart catheterization (RHC). Method PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched by two independent reviewers for potentially eligible studies published up to 30 June 2019 to retrieve data based on per-patient analysis. STATA, Meta-DiSc, and RevMan were applied to perform this meta-analysis. Results Our search yielded 1576 studies, of which 11 satisfied the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve (AUC) of echocardiography for POPH were 0.85 (95% CI [0.65–0.94]), 0.83 (95% CI [0.73–0.90]), 4.99 (95% CI [3.03–8.21]), 0.19 (95% CI [0.07–0.46]), and 0.91 (95% CI [0.88–0.93]), respectively. Deeks’ funnel plot did not indicate the existence of publication bias (P = 0.66). Conclusions Echocardiography, a noninvasive modality, provides superior screening for POPH, but the diagnosis of POPH still requires RHC. PROSPERO registration number CRD42019144589.


2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liana Gheorghe ◽  
Ioan Sporea ◽  
Speranţa Iacob ◽  
Roxana Şirli ◽  
Anca Trifan ◽  
...  

Background & Aims: Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection is a common condition with endemic prevalence in some areas of the world. In Romania, the mean prevalence is about 3%. New treatments became available on the market in recent years and new drugs are in the pipeline. A re-evaluation of HCV therapy was considered mandatory. The Romanian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology undertook this task for the practitioners of this country.Methodology: A group of recognized experts was created who screened the available literature and the major available guidelines. A list of items requiring attention has been created. These items were discussed and rated. Decisions were taken by consensus.Recommendations: We present here the first of the two parts of our Society’s recommendations for chronic HCV infection treatment. An agreement was reached regarding the diagnostic tools, the assessment of severity and the up-dated therapy schedules.Conclusions: This Position Paper represents a guide for the assessment and the therapy of HCV infection. The recommendations are in concordance with other guidelines but are applied to the real-life conditions in this country.Abbreviations: DAAs: Direct-acting antivirals; DDIs: Drug-drug interactions; ESLD: End-stage liver disease; ESRD: End-stage renal disease; eGFR: Estimated glomerular filtration rate; EASL: European Association for the Study of the Liver; EMA: European Medicines Agency; FDA: US Food and Drug Administration; FDC: Fixed-dose combination; GT: Genotype; GRADE: Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; HCV: Hepatitis C virus; HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma; LT: Liver transplantation; LLD: Lower limit of detection; MELD score: Mayo-Clinic End-Stage Liver Disease score; ANMDM: National Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices; PPIs: Proton pump inhibitors; PWID: People who inject drugs; RCT: Randomized controlled trial; RDT: Rapid diagnostic test; RAS: Resistance-associated substitution; SRGH: Romanian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; SAE: serious adverse events; SPC: Summary of Product Characteristics; SVR: Sustained virologic response.


2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liana Gheorghe ◽  
Ioan Sporea ◽  
Speranța Iacob ◽  
Roxana Șirli ◽  
Anca Trifan ◽  
...  

Background & Aims: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a common condition with endemic prevalence in some areas of the world. In Romania, the mean prevalence is about 3%. New treatments have become available on the market in recent years and new drugs are in the pipeline. A re-evaluation of HCV therapy was considered mandatory. The Romanian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology undertook this task for the practitioners of this country.Methodology: A group of recognized experts was created who screened the available literature and the major available guidelines. A list of items requiring attention was created and these were discussed and rated. Decisions were taken by consensus.Recommendations: We present here the second part of the Society’s recommendations for chronic HCV infection treatment. An agreement between experts was reached regarding the therapy of the special categories of patients infected with HCV, complications and monitoring of the therapy, follow-up of the patients who reached sustained virologic response and re-treatment of the patients with therapy failure.Conclusions: This Position Paper represents a guide for the assessment and the therapy of HCV infection. The recommendations are in concordance with other guidelines but are applied to real-life conditions in Romania. Abbreviations: CKD: Chronic kidney disease; DAAs: Direct-acting antivirals; DDIs: Drug-drug interactions; ESDL: End-stage liver disease; FCH: Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis; GT: Genotype; HCV: Hepatitis C virus; HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma; LT: Liver transplantation; MELD score: Mayo-Clinic End-Stage Liver Disease score; PDC: Premature discontinuation; PWID: Persons who inject drugs; RASs: Resistance associated substitutions; RBV: Ribavirin; RCT: Randomized controlled trial; SAE: Serious adverse events; SRGH: Romanian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; SVR: Sustained virologic response.


2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Odilson Marcos Silvestre ◽  
Fernando Bacal ◽  
Danusa de Souza Ramos ◽  
Jose L. Andrade ◽  
Meive Furtado ◽  
...  

Gut ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. gutjnl-2021-324879
Author(s):  
Luca Saverio Belli ◽  
Christophe Duvoux ◽  
Paolo Angelo Cortesi ◽  
Rita Facchetti ◽  
Speranta Iacob ◽  
...  

ObjectiveExplore the impact of COVID-19 on patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation (LT) and on their post-LT course.DesignData from consecutive adult LT candidates with COVID-19 were collected across Europe in a dedicated registry and were analysed.ResultsFrom 21 February to 20 November 2020, 136 adult cases with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection from 33 centres in 11 European countries were collected, with 113 having COVID-19. Thirty-seven (37/113, 32.7%) patients died after a median of 18 (10–30) days, with respiratory failure being the major cause (33/37, 89.2%). The 60-day mortality risk did not significantly change between first (35.3%, 95% CI 23.9% to 50.0%) and second (26.0%, 95% CI 16.2% to 40.2%) waves. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed Laboratory Model for End-stage Liver Disease (Lab-MELD) score of ≥15 (Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score 15–19, HR 5.46, 95% CI 1.81 to 16.50; MELD score≥20, HR 5.24, 95% CI 1.77 to 15.55) and dyspnoea on presentation (HR 3.89, 95% CI 2.02 to 7.51) being the two negative independent factors for mortality. Twenty-six patients underwent an LT after a median time of 78.5 (IQR 44–102) days, and 25 (96%) were alive after a median follow-up of 118 days (IQR 31–170).ConclusionsIncreased mortality in LT candidates with COVID-19 (32.7%), reaching 45% in those with decompensated cirrhosis (DC) and Lab-MELD score of ≥15, was observed, with no significant difference between first and second waves of the pandemic. Respiratory failure was the major cause of death. The dismal prognosis of patients with DC supports the adoption of strict preventative measures and the urgent testing of vaccination efficacy in this population. Prior SARS-CoV-2 symptomatic infection did not affect early post-transplant survival (96%).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document