Immunochemical methods for identification of prey in freshwater zooplankton

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 221-234
Author(s):  
John A. Berges ◽  
David J. Gronquist ◽  
Paul G. Engevold ◽  
Nathaniel Thorngate‐Rein ◽  
Craig D. Sandgren ◽  
...  
Oikos ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn Govaert ◽  
Luc De Meester ◽  
Sarah Rousseaux ◽  
Steven A. J. Declerck ◽  
Jelena H. Pantel

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 1849-1856
Author(s):  
D. E. Gavrilko ◽  
G. V. Shurganova ◽  
I. A. Kudrin ◽  
B. N. Yakimov

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Zachariasova ◽  
P. Cuhra ◽  
J. Hajslova

The cross-reactivity of antibodies employed within immunochemistry-based analytical methods may lead to overestimation of the results. Under certain conditions, specifically when controlling mycotoxin maximum limits serious problems can be encountered. Not only the structurally related mycotoxins, such as their masked (conjugated) forms, but also the unidentified matrix components are responsible for concentration overestimation of respective target analytes. The cross-reactivity phenomenon may also pose a risk of miss-interpretation of the proficiency tests results, when the assigned value becomes influenced by over-estimated results reported by users of immunochemical tests. In this paper, the current state of the knowledge on trueness problems associated with the rapid screening immunochemical methods have been reviewed. Special attention is focused on discussion of cross-reactivity in the ELISA tests, because this rapid test dominates the routine screening practice. However, the cross-reactions reported in lateral flow test strips, fluorescence polarisation immunoassay, or immunosensors have also been addressed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 396-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alba Arenas‐Sánchez ◽  
Isabel López‐Heras ◽  
Leonor Nozal ◽  
Marco Vighi ◽  
Andreu Rico

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document