scholarly journals A century of conservation: The ongoing recovery of Svalbard reindeer

2019 ◽  
Vol 83 (8) ◽  
pp. 1676-1686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathilde Le Moullec ◽  
Åshild Ønvik Pedersen ◽  
Audun Stien ◽  
Jørgen Rosvold ◽  
Brage Bremset Hansen
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (36) ◽  
pp. 36693-36701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Hubert Węgrzyn ◽  
Paulina Wietrzyk ◽  
Sara Lehmann-Konera ◽  
Stanisław Chmiel ◽  
Beata Cykowska-Marzencka ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 44 (Suppl. 1) ◽  
pp. 164-164
Author(s):  
W. Sormo ◽  
TD Josefsen ◽  
SD Mathiesen

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-23
Author(s):  
Jan Kavan ◽  
Veronika Anděrová

AbstractA new non-invasive method based on picture analysis was used to estimate the conditions in Svalbard reindeer populations. The well-being of an individual subject is often expressed through visual indices. Two distinct reindeer populations were compared based on their antler parameters. Relative antler size and number of tines are variables supposed to reflect correspondingly the environmental conditions of sedentary populations within the growing season. The occurrence areas of two studied populations are distinctly isolated – separated with high mountain ridges, glaciers and fjords. The population in Petuniabukta occupies a sparsely vegetated region with harsh climatic conditions, whereas Skansbukta represents an area with continuous tundra vegetation cover, milder climatic conditions and, consequently, also a longer vegetation season. These environmental factors probably caused significant differences in the relative antler size and number of tines in the studied species. The Skansbukta population exhibited a larger relative antler size and higher number of tines than the population in Petuniabukta (both parameters differed significantly, p < 0.01). This difference reflects concisely the different environmental conditions of both locations. A comparison of Skansbukta population antler characteristics between years 2017 and 2018 did not reveal significant changes, most probably due to very similar atmospheric conditions in these two years (in terms of air temperature).


Rangifer ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geir Gotaas ◽  
Eric Milne ◽  
Paul Haggarty ◽  
Nicholas J.C. Tyler

The doubly labelled water (DLW) method was used to measure total energy expenditure (TEE) in three male reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) aged 22 months in winter (February) while the animals were living unrestricted at natural mountain pasture in northern Norway (69&deg;20'N). The concentrations of 2H and l8O were measured in water extracted from samples of faeces collecred from the animals 0.4 and 11.2 days after injection of the isotopes. Calculated rates of water flux and CO2-production were adjusted to compensate for estimated losses of 2H in faecal solids and in methane produced by microbial fermentation of forage in the rumen. The mean specific TEE in the three animals was 3.057 W.kg-1 (range 2.436 - 3.728 W.kg1). This value is 64% higher than TEE measured by the DLW method in four captive, non-pregnant adult female reindeer in winter and probably mainly reflects higher levels of locomotor activity in the free-living animals. Previous estimates of TEE in free-living Rangifer in winter based on factorial models range from 3.038 W.kg-1 in female woodland caribou (R. t. caribou) to 1.813 W.kg-1 in female Svalbard reindeer (R. t. platyrhynchus). Thus, it seems that existing factorial models are unlikely to overestimate TEE in reindeer/caribou: they may, instead, be unduly conservative. While the present study serves as a general validation of the factorial approach, we suggest that the route to progress in the understanding of field energetics in wild ungulates is via application of the DLW method.


Rangifer ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 47 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Sørmo ◽  
Ø. E. Haga ◽  
S. D. Mathiesen
Keyword(s):  

Cellulolysis in the fermentation chambers in Svalbard reindeer


Chemosphere ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 203 ◽  
pp. 209-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aneta Dorota Pacyna ◽  
Katarzyna Koziorowska ◽  
Stanisław Chmiel ◽  
Jan Mazerski ◽  
Żaneta Polkowska

ARCTIC ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Å.O. Pedersen ◽  
M. Lier ◽  
H. Routti ◽  
H.H. Christiansen ◽  
E. Fuglei

Oecologia ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 116 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 202-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Wegener ◽  
Ann Marie Odasz-Albrigtsen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document