Biogas production by anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable waste. A preliminary study

1978 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 822-830 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wieger Knol ◽  
Michael M. Van Der Most ◽  
Jacobus De Waart
2015 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 355-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Hernández-Shek ◽  
L. S. Cadavid-Rodríguez ◽  
I. V. Bolaños ◽  
A. C. Agudelo-Henao

The potential to recover bioenergy from anaerobic digestion of water hyacinth (WH) and from its co-digestion with fruit and vegetable waste (FVW) was investigated. Initially, biogas and methane production were studied using the biochemical methane potential (BMP) test at 2 g volatile solids (VS) L−1 of substrate concentration, both in the digestion of WH alone and in its co-digestion with FVW (WH-FVW ratio of 70:30). Subsequently, the biogas production was optimized in terms of total solids (TS) concentration, testing 4 and 6% of TS. The BMP test showed a biogas yield of 0.114 m3 biogas kg−1 VSadded for WH alone. On the other hand, the biogas potential from the WH-FVW co-digestion was 0.141 m3 biogas kg−1 VSadded, showing an increase of 23% compared to that of WH alone. Maximum biogas production of 0.230 m3 biogas kg−1 VSadded was obtained at 4% of TS in the co-digestion of WH-FVW. Using semi-continuously stirred tank reactors, 1.3 m3 biogas yield kg−1 VSadded was produced using an organic loading rate of 2 kg VS m−3 d−1 and hydraulic retention time of 15 days. It was also found that a WH-FVW ratio of 80:20 improved the process in terms of pH stability. Additionally, it was found that nitrogen can be recovered in the liquid effluent with a potential for use as a liquid fertilizer.


2017 ◽  
Vol 183 (3) ◽  
pp. 906-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Ji ◽  
Chui-Xue Kong ◽  
Zi-Li Mei ◽  
Jiang Li

2014 ◽  
Vol 1008-1009 ◽  
pp. 121-126
Author(s):  
Lin Jun Shi ◽  
Wen Lan Liu ◽  
Hui Fen Liu ◽  
Wei Yu Zhang ◽  
Li Tong Ban

Anaerobic digestion of single dairy manure, single vegetable waste, mixture of dairy manure and vegetable waste was conducted to produce biogas. Startup characteristic, leachate parameters and inoculation amount were investigated. The experimental results showed that anaerobic digestion can start up quickly with acclimated thickening sludge as inoculation sludge and 30% was appropriate inoculation percentage. Digestion of single dairy manure and mixture of dairy manure and vegetable waste appeared better buffering ability with higher alkalinity than single vegetable waste. Compared to single digestion of dairy manure or vegetable waste, mixture of dairy manure and vegetable waste is more suitable for anaerobic digestion. Under the conditions of TS=10% and T=(36±1)°C, cumulative biogas production of mixture of dairy manure and vegetable waste is 5281 mL during the period of 30 days and average daily gas production is about 176 mL. These results could provide theoretical data for practical biogas engineering.


2011 ◽  
Vol 64 (9) ◽  
pp. 1851-1856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan D. Park ◽  
Ronald W. Thring ◽  
Randy P. Garton ◽  
Michael P. Rutherford ◽  
Steve S. Helle

Anaerobic digestion is a well established technology for the reduction of organic matter and stabilization of wastewater. Biogas, a mixture of methane and carbon dioxide, is produced as a useful by-product of the process. Current solid waste management at the city of Prince George is focused on disposal of waste and not on energy recovery. Co-digestion of fresh fruit and vegetable waste with sewer sludge can improve biogas yield by increasing the load of biodegradable material. A six week full-scale project co-digesting almost 15,000 kg of supermarket waste was completed. Average daily biogas production was found to be significantly higher than in previous years. Digester operation remained stable over the course of the study as indicated by the consistently low volatile acids-to-alkalinity ratio. Undigested organic material was visible in centrifuged sludge suggesting that the waste should have been added to the primary digester to prevent short circuiting and to increase the hydraulic retention time of the freshly added waste.


2017 ◽  
Vol 228 ◽  
pp. 362-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suelen Pavi ◽  
Luis Eduardo Kramer ◽  
Luciana Paulo Gomes ◽  
Luis Alcides Schiavo Miranda

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document