New insights into paper-Chemical paper analysis using Raman microscopy

Author(s):  
Enrico Pigorsch
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
N. Çebi ◽  
T. Öztürk ◽  
C.E. Doğan ◽  
O. Sağdıç

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuki Murakami ◽  
Shinji Kajimoto ◽  
Daiki Shibata ◽  
Kunisato Kuroi ◽  
Fumihiko Fujii ◽  
...  

Liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) plays an important role in a variety of biological processes and is also associated with protein aggregation in neurodegenerative diseases. Quantification of LLPS is necessary to...


1970 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-18
Author(s):  
Rubina Sultana ◽  
Khondker Manzare Shamim ◽  
Lutfun Nahar ◽  
Ferdous Hasan

Objective: In ‘Curriculum' 2002 short answer questions are newly introduced. The content of 1st professional written examination was given but the weightage of different subdivision of Anatomy is not mentioned. So, present study was done to see the content validity of different subdivisions of Anatomy in written examinations. Study design: Descriptive type of study Place and period of study: The study was carried out from January 2003 to July 2004 in the Department of Anatomy, Bangabandhu Skeikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka. Methods: It was based on a quantitative method; the question paper analysis based study. Results: It is evident from the questions paper analysis that different subdivisions of Anatomy are usually not given proper weight in the Anatomy written examinations. There are some subdivisions of Anatomy which are usually covered less than required. These include Genetics, Histology, General Anatomy, General Developmental Anatomy, Clinical Anatomy, etc. Conclusion: for further improvement of assessment system of Anatomy, content validity is needed to be established. Key words: Content validity, Anatomy, undergraduate, written examinations   doi: 10.3329/bja.v7i1.3011 Bangladesh Journal of Anatomy January 2009, Vol. 7 No. 1 pp. 14-18


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 647-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yundong Zhou ◽  
Christopher Doerrer ◽  
Jitti Kasemchainan ◽  
Peter G. Bruce ◽  
Mauro Pasta ◽  
...  

Nano Letters ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 1736-1740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip Olk ◽  
Jan Renger ◽  
Thomas Härtling ◽  
Marc Tobias Wenzel ◽  
Lukas M. Eng
Keyword(s):  

1995 ◽  
Vol 99 (44) ◽  
pp. 16383-16388 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Ajito ◽  
L. A. Nagahara ◽  
D. A. Tryk ◽  
K. Hashimoto ◽  
A. Fujishima

2008 ◽  
Vol 354 (26) ◽  
pp. 3059-3071 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. Noons ◽  
Robin Devonshire ◽  
Terry V. Clapp ◽  
Suresh M. Ojha ◽  
Orla McCarthy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document