Analysis of multicomponent mass spectra applying Bayesian probability theory

2001 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 866-874 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Schwarz-Selinger ◽  
R. Preuss ◽  
V. Dose ◽  
W. von der Linden
2002 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. 748-754 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. D. Kang ◽  
R. Preuss ◽  
T. Schwarz-Selinger ◽  
V. Dose

2010 ◽  
Vol 128 (5) ◽  
pp. 2940-2948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian C. Anderson ◽  
Adam Q. Bauer ◽  
Mark R. Holland ◽  
Michal Pakula ◽  
Pascal Laugier ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajendra P. Srivastava ◽  
Sunita S. Rao ◽  
Theodore J. Mock

ABSTRACT This study develops a framework for planning, performing, and evaluating evidence obtained to assess and control the risks of providing assurance on sustainability reports. Sustainability reporting, or corporate sustainability reporting (CSR), provides stakeholders with important information on both financial and non-financial factors related to environmental, social, and economic performance. Importantly, the presented framework is developed from both a Bayesian (probability-based theory) and Belief Function (Dempster-Shafer theory) perspective. This facilitates application of the framework to cases where the assurance provider prefers to assess risk in terms of probability versus in terms of beliefs. To demonstrate the application of this framework we evaluate assertions, sub-assertions, and audit evidence relevant to CSR based on the G3 Reporting framework developed by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). The paper contributes to the literature in three main areas. First, it demonstrates how evidence-based reasoning can be used for engagements where different levels of assurance are provided for the assertions being audited. Second, it shows how various items of evidence at different levels may be aggregated. Third, it presents a generic theoretical model for assuring information based on belief-based assessments, which is then contrasted with a theoretical model based on probability theory. In contrasting the two approaches, we show that in cases where initial uncertainty is substantial, the use of Dempster-Shafer theory has advantages over probability theory in terms of efficiency in achieving a targeted low level of assurance.


2010 ◽  
Vol 127 (3) ◽  
pp. 2006-2006
Author(s):  
Christian C. Anderson ◽  
Michal Pakula ◽  
Pascal Laugier ◽  
G. Larry Bretthorst ◽  
Mark R. Holland ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Vahid Badeli ◽  
Sascha Ranftl ◽  
Gian Marco Melito ◽  
Alice Reinbacher-Köstinger ◽  
Wolfgang Von Der Linden ◽  
...  

Purpose This paper aims to introduce a non-invasive and convenient method to detect a life-threatening disease called aortic dissection. A Bayesian inference based on enhanced multi-sensors impedance cardiography (ICG) method has been applied to classify signals from healthy and sick patients. Design/methodology/approach A 3D numerical model consisting of simplified organ geometries is used to simulate the electrical impedance changes in the ICG-relevant domain of the human torso. The Bayesian probability theory is used for detecting an aortic dissection, which provides information about the probabilities for both cases, a dissected and a healthy aorta. Thus, the reliability and the uncertainty of the disease identification are found by this method and may indicate further diagnostic clarification. Findings The Bayesian classification shows that the enhanced multi-sensors ICG is more reliable in detecting aortic dissection than conventional ICG. Bayesian probability theory allows a rigorous quantification of all uncertainties to draw reliable conclusions for the medical treatment of aortic dissection. Originality/value This paper presents a non-invasive and reliable method based on a numerical simulation that could be beneficial for the medical management of aortic dissection patients. With this method, clinicians would be able to monitor the patient’s status and make better decisions in the treatment procedure of each patient.


2010 ◽  
Vol 128 (4) ◽  
pp. 2363-2363
Author(s):  
Christian C. Anderson ◽  
G. Larry Bretthorst ◽  
Mark R. Holland ◽  
James G Miller

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document