Influence of different calcium hydroxide removal protocols on the bond strength of epoxy resin‐based sealer in long oval root canals

Author(s):  
Patrícia Maria Escobar ◽  
Fabiane Carneiro Lopes ◽  
Kleber Carvalho ◽  
Vicente Fretes ◽  
Gabriela Gavilán Hadid ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatih Cakici ◽  
Elif Bahar Cakici ◽  
Kadir Tolga Ceyhanli ◽  
Ersan Celik ◽  
Funda Fundaoglu Kucukekenci ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 668
Author(s):  
Fernanda Hoffmann Busanello ◽  
Angela Longo Do Nascimento ◽  
Lilian Tietz ◽  
Mirela Sangoi Barreto ◽  
Ricardo Abreu Da Rosa ◽  
...  

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of different lengths of time of passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) in removing calcium hydroxide (CH) paste from root canal, using scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectrometry (SEM/EDS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-four human premolars were used. After coronal access, a size #15 K-file was used to obtain apical patency. Root canal preparation was performed using WaveOne 40.08 instruments. CH paste was placed into the root canal. Specimens were stored in a humid environment, and after seven days, they were divided into five groups (n=12) according to the irrigation protocols: Manual– a size #40 K-file; PUI/1– 1 min; PUI/2– 2 min; PUI/3– 3 min; and Control– without CH paste. An elementary chemical microanalysis (SEM/EDS) was performed to quantify the presence of calcium on the dentinal walls. RESULTS: The percentage of calcium was higher in all experimental groups when compared to the control group (P < 0.05); but no differences among them were found (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The amount of calcium hydroxide paste on the dentinal walls was not dependent on length of time of ultrasonic activation. SEM/EDS analysis seems to be a reliable method to assess CH paste removal from the root canals.


2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-166
Author(s):  
Ying Li ◽  
Mengyu Zhou ◽  
Mathieu Lefeuvre ◽  
Hitoshi Nagatsuka ◽  
Weidong Niu

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 1196-1202
Author(s):  
Ayhan Eymirli ◽  
Ozgur Uyanik ◽  
Emre Nagas ◽  
Semra Calt Tarhan

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 553-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingzhi Ma ◽  
Ya Shen ◽  
Yan Yang ◽  
Yuan Gao ◽  
Pan Wan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ying Song ◽  
Jing-zhi Ma ◽  
Ru-yan Wang ◽  
Xue-dong Zhou ◽  
Ling Zou ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-22
Author(s):  
Neslihan Büşra Keskin ◽  
Selen İnce Yusufoğlu

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of two preparation systems and two irrigation techniques in calcium hydroxide removal from straight root canals. Methodology: Forty-four mandibular premolar teeth were included in this study. The teeth were filled with a calcium hydroxide-based paste and randomly divided into two different preparation groups (Reciproc 50 (R50; VDW, Munich, Germany and ProTaper Universal F5 (PTU; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). Subsequently, the groups were divided into two subgroups and irrigated using EDDY (VDW, Munich, Germany) and CanalBrush (CB; Roeko, Langenau, Germany) irrigation activation systems. The percentage of calcium hydroxide removed from the canal walls was analyzed using a dental operating microscope (DOM) at 25× magnification. An independent samples t-test, a Mann–Whitney U, Wilcoxon’s tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: There was no significant difference in calcium hydroxide removal throughout the root canal using the R50 and PTU F5 preparation systems (P = 0.847). Both activation systems significantly increased the amount of calcium hydroxide removed from the root canal. Conclusions: EDDY and CB significantly improved calcium hydroxide removal. There was no significant difference between the R50 and PTU F5 systems in calcium hydroxide removal. How to cite this article: Keskin NB, İnce Yusufoğlu S. Evaluation of the effectiveness of reciprocal and conventional shaping systems and EDDY and CanalBrush activation systems in calcium hydroxide removal. Int Dent Res 2021;11(1):16-22. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.no1.4   Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document